why would i use a p72 over a p28 in my allmotor application?
if u have a B series motor, then the P72 has fuel and ignition mapping for it. P28 has tables for a SOHC motor. it dont matter too much, but if i were u, i would get a OBD1 P28 or P72, socket it and run CROME for their ITB support
I've already got a socketed and crome tps mapped p28. 
I've already got a socketed and crom tps mapped p72.
I was thinking of maybe using the p72 just for the fact that it has a knock sensor and I could possibly use that for my datalogging/ tuning - especially with my high compression setup that I'm building.....

I've already got a socketed and crom tps mapped p72.

I was thinking of maybe using the p72 just for the fact that it has a knock sensor and I could possibly use that for my datalogging/ tuning - especially with my high compression setup that I'm building.....
the knock sensor isn't quite useless, but damn close. If you have a built motor, it's damn useless. The knck sensor is tuned for a rather specific noise, and if you do too much to change that (forged pistons, difference in bore in particular) it ceases to be useful. The reason to use a P72 is for the extra output (IAB) but it's a non-issue with ITBs.
And if you have big cams, you may want to get+install ITB tools plus. It's a little OTT in terms of column resolution, but having the extra rows is making a huge difference on the car with Pro1s I'm working on.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blundar »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">And if you have big cams, you may want to get+install ITB tools plus. It's a little OTT in terms of column resolution, but having the extra rows is making a huge difference on the car with Pro1s I'm working on.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I believe johnzm used itbtools+ on cromepro for the base map he burned for me.
I believe johnzm used itbtools+ on cromepro for the base map he burned for me.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blundar »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">good luck, and rememeber to use the force. Don't be afraid to feed the ****** fuel either. ITBs are very peaky</TD></TR></TABLE>
haha, I am very concerned re: running out of fuel.....!
haha, I am very concerned re: running out of fuel.....!
DYNO-PRO
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
From: SoCal I.E 909, CA, where we innovate not immitate
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by .nate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ITB's love fuel. When we converted from a IM to TWM's I had to add shitloads...</TD></TR></TABLE>AGREEEEEED!!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blundar »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the knock sensor isn't quite useless, but damn close. If you have a built motor, it's damn useless. The knck sensor is tuned for a rather specific noise, and if you do too much to change that (forged pistons, difference in bore in particular) it ceases to be useful. The reason to use a P72 is for the extra output (IAB) but it's a non-issue with ITBs.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah. I seem to be logging "knock" at half throttle with my setup now. 11.3:1 comrpession with some pretty large cams. USDM ITR pistons though. I put in some 110 octane and STILL logged the same amount of knock.. I think that the knock sensor tends to pick up "engine noise" a little more then anything else at this point. I agree that it is somewhat useless at this point.
Yeah. I seem to be logging "knock" at half throttle with my setup now. 11.3:1 comrpession with some pretty large cams. USDM ITR pistons though. I put in some 110 octane and STILL logged the same amount of knock.. I think that the knock sensor tends to pick up "engine noise" a little more then anything else at this point. I agree that it is somewhat useless at this point.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





