Opinions on ATS 4.9 Final
I am very interested in the ATS final and I was curious if anyone had installed or used it for an Auto-X/ Road racing applications (not streeting the car) if you would, please let me know if it is too aggresive or if it will balance out a setup?
I know this doesn't address the original question, but I daily drive on an ats 4.9 FD and coming from the 4.4 FD it's just KRAZY.
I will be road racing/ auto-x-ing a little later down the road. It's like when your in 4th just rev's hella fast and bam when you hit 5th gear you'll still be in Vtec, so vtec doesn't fall off.
+ here you go, this is an interesting thread. go down a lil and read about the road racing w/ the final drive
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1251052
Modified by dragonz04 at 10:39 PM 8/14/2005
I will be road racing/ auto-x-ing a little later down the road. It's like when your in 4th just rev's hella fast and bam when you hit 5th gear you'll still be in Vtec, so vtec doesn't fall off.
+ here you go, this is an interesting thread. go down a lil and read about the road racing w/ the final drive
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1251052
Modified by dragonz04 at 10:39 PM 8/14/2005
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Felix. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good for road racing/auto x/ canyons etc.. Not so good for 1/4 mile racing. </TD></TR></TABLE>
How so? Why wouldn't it be beneficial for quarter mile racing? I don't c that.
edit: A 4.9 fd would have a more consistent advantage over a stock fd in a 1/4 mile. Am I right here?
How so? Why wouldn't it be beneficial for quarter mile racing? I don't c that.
edit: A 4.9 fd would have a more consistent advantage over a stock fd in a 1/4 mile. Am I right here?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by noboostedEGo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How so? Why wouldn't it be beneficial for quarter mile racing? I don't c that.
edit: A 4.9 fd would have a more consistent advantage over a stock fd in a 1/4 mile. Am I right here?</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=300231
edit: A 4.9 fd would have a more consistent advantage over a stock fd in a 1/4 mile. Am I right here?</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=300231
Cool thanks
This threw me off I guess, maybe I'm misinterpreting
This is why the stock FD can be a big advantage on tracks where you spend a lot of time near redline, but the shorter FD can be a big advantage on tracks where you don't. So theoretically, if you were on a track where you spent the entire track driving between 79 and 88 mph, or between 88 and 104 mph, you would have a clear cut winner between the two gearing setups. However, most tracks have enough of a mix of speeds that you're probably going to be spending some time in the same gear, and some time in the higher gear, and the gains in one set of stretches will largely offset the losses in others.
For example, tom91ita mentioned Grattan, and driving most of the track (in his 1st gen CRX) in third with the longer (stock?) FD, but spending some time in fourth with the shorter FD. That's a typical scenario. On the stretches where you are in third gear with either setup, the shorter FD is quicker. On the stretches where the shorter FD forces you into fourth gear, the stock FD is quicker.
FWIW, in my ITR, I find that I can do a lot of Grattan in second gear - including the off-camber turn 3, the fast-turning stretch from the braking zone after the jump to turn 7, and the toilet bowl. On those stretches, a shorter FD will require the use of third gear in those turns, and possibly fourth gear elsewhere, and it would be a disadvantage in those areas. In the areas where you would be in third gear in either setup, it would be an advantage.
Incidentally, on a dragstrip, the shorter FD is more consistently an advantage, because of the large amount of time you would be in first gear, and in second gear, with either setup. In our ITR example, from 0 to 55 mph, the shorter FD is a significant advantage most of the time; however, above 55 mph (where you spend road course time) the advantage swaps back and forth between the two setups, depending on the road speed.
posted by nsxtasy
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1251052
This threw me off I guess, maybe I'm misinterpreting
This is why the stock FD can be a big advantage on tracks where you spend a lot of time near redline, but the shorter FD can be a big advantage on tracks where you don't. So theoretically, if you were on a track where you spent the entire track driving between 79 and 88 mph, or between 88 and 104 mph, you would have a clear cut winner between the two gearing setups. However, most tracks have enough of a mix of speeds that you're probably going to be spending some time in the same gear, and some time in the higher gear, and the gains in one set of stretches will largely offset the losses in others.
For example, tom91ita mentioned Grattan, and driving most of the track (in his 1st gen CRX) in third with the longer (stock?) FD, but spending some time in fourth with the shorter FD. That's a typical scenario. On the stretches where you are in third gear with either setup, the shorter FD is quicker. On the stretches where the shorter FD forces you into fourth gear, the stock FD is quicker.
FWIW, in my ITR, I find that I can do a lot of Grattan in second gear - including the off-camber turn 3, the fast-turning stretch from the braking zone after the jump to turn 7, and the toilet bowl. On those stretches, a shorter FD will require the use of third gear in those turns, and possibly fourth gear elsewhere, and it would be a disadvantage in those areas. In the areas where you would be in third gear in either setup, it would be an advantage.
Incidentally, on a dragstrip, the shorter FD is more consistently an advantage, because of the large amount of time you would be in first gear, and in second gear, with either setup. In our ITR example, from 0 to 55 mph, the shorter FD is a significant advantage most of the time; however, above 55 mph (where you spend road course time) the advantage swaps back and forth between the two setups, depending on the road speed.
posted by nsxtasy
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1251052
nice write up......glad to know the majority of the people using this FD for road racing/Auto X are very pleased with there results
for autox, it's imperative.
for daily, it's fun.
for road racing, it depends on the track.
for drag, calculate your mph and power first - then decide.
i've run the 4.9 in two of my project cars and will be installing it in another one soon.
Everything ATS is
You will get a lot of "do a search" responses wrt the 4.9 or ATS type of questions - simply because the subject has been (quite frankly) beaten to a bloody pulp type of death..... Lots of valuable information is in the archives - regardless of whether it's recent or not, it still holds true..... Try the FAQ in the itr forum - the is a buttload of final drive links.
Modified by Black R at 11:19 AM 8/15/2005
for daily, it's fun.
for road racing, it depends on the track.
for drag, calculate your mph and power first - then decide.
i've run the 4.9 in two of my project cars and will be installing it in another one soon.

Everything ATS is

You will get a lot of "do a search" responses wrt the 4.9 or ATS type of questions - simply because the subject has been (quite frankly) beaten to a bloody pulp type of death..... Lots of valuable information is in the archives - regardless of whether it's recent or not, it still holds true..... Try the FAQ in the itr forum - the is a buttload of final drive links.
Modified by Black R at 11:19 AM 8/15/2005
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




