Check out this crazy AntiReversion 2JZ manifold my buddy Kenny made
can someone enlighten the less informed as to what benefit these antireversion chambers provide?
perhaps that will make this thread technical rather than just a bunch of pretty pictures.
perhaps that will make this thread technical rather than just a bunch of pretty pictures.
Laminent flow collectors flow great. Unfortunately they flow great in both directions. The idea behind the bulkhead in this collector design is to reduce the amount of flow between runners. As a result you get quicker spool ups and cylinder scavange. If it didn't work Gary wouldn't be winning. GM did some homework
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blitzkrieg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Laminent flow collectors flow great. Unfortunately they flow great in both directions. The idea behind the bulkhead in this collector design is to reduce the amount of flow between runners. As a result you get quicker spool ups and cylinder scavange. If it didn't work Gary wouldn't be winning. GM did some homework
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm not seeing how reversion is going to be a problem, most modern day engines do not even experience reversion in the first place and i'm not seeing how this would benefit spool up time? Do you have any back to back dyno charts? anything showing the difference in curves or spool time?
The reason i ask on a header we design for a PRO RWD 2JZ engine we did not experience any reversion issues and we gained a significant amount of horsepower from running a tuned length properly sized header in 6-2-1 configuration. not trying to be an ***
just trying to start a good discussion on design theory's
</TD></TR></TABLE>I'm not seeing how reversion is going to be a problem, most modern day engines do not even experience reversion in the first place and i'm not seeing how this would benefit spool up time? Do you have any back to back dyno charts? anything showing the difference in curves or spool time?
The reason i ask on a header we design for a PRO RWD 2JZ engine we did not experience any reversion issues and we gained a significant amount of horsepower from running a tuned length properly sized header in 6-2-1 configuration. not trying to be an ***
just trying to start a good discussion on design theory's
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blitzkrieg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If it didn't work Gary wouldn't be winning. GM did some homework
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Haha, i don't think it's that simple. Gary's car does not win because of that manifold design.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Haha, i don't think it's that simple. Gary's car does not win because of that manifold design.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blitzkrieg
Forced Induction
12
Aug 9, 2005 03:52 PM
austrian type-R
Forced Induction
4
Apr 14, 2004 10:11 AM
2jz, 62, antireversion, chambers, crazy, design, fabrication, grip, header, industries, manifold, swap




