All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

s2s3 too much with no headwork?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 09:06 AM
  #1  
xDicktonesx's Avatar
Thread Starter
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Default s2s3 too much with no headwork?

would a skunk2 stage 3 be too radical with no headwork and an 11.8:1 CR?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 09:08 AM
  #2  
PURPLETERROR aka BIGMATT's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: albany, ny, usa
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

depends on the motor, what is your setup.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 10:11 AM
  #3  
xDicktonesx's Avatar
Thread Starter
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (PURPLETERROR)

b16 82mm bore
11.8:1 comp
smsp header
aebs manifold
head will be milled 0.035 with stock HG


thats all that will effect the cam selection. my other alternatives are BC4 or jun 3 or 4 from what ive been looking at. ive already got a beefy valvetrain brand new in a shoebox. so i cant justify the 9-something for the rockets plus the valvetrain. only looking to make power to about 9300 or so. want something similiar to roger foo's old set-up. only difference being the enlarged bore. thats where im looking to make more power.

i just dont want to have to take my head to portflow or alaniz and throwdown 1400 for a headjob and a 2 week turn around if i can get away with cleaning up the ports myself. mostly just a little polishing of the floors



Modified by CRXofPain at 11:24 AM 8/6/2005
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #4  
xDicktonesx's Avatar
Thread Starter
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

injectors are rc 310

im still working with the ecu. right now its a chipped pw0 with a safc2.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 10:33 AM
  #5  
PURPLETERROR aka BIGMATT's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: albany, ny, usa
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

skunk2 pro1's stage 3's are to big for that motor.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 10:40 AM
  #6  
xEnderx's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
From: Peein in yo momz butt
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (PURPLETERROR)

Is tha tyour compression ratio before or after the head milling?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 11:01 AM
  #7  
xDicktonesx's Avatar
Thread Starter
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (xEnderx)

thats the final CR after the mil is done. pistons domed 5cc

stage3 too large? i thought the pro series was larger than all that came before it and skunk2 stage 3 came before the pro series so wouldnt that make the stage 3 more mild that the pro 1s? maybe im just effing lost. ill probably run what steve the omni dude ran in his which is dynamic stage a for those of you not in the know
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #8  
xEnderx's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
From: Peein in yo momz butt
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

The cams would likely work pretty well, but I'd say you could get optimal power with somethign a bit smaller. Just my opinion mind you.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 11:25 AM
  #9  
xDicktonesx's Avatar
Thread Starter
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (xEnderx)

jun 3 maybe? toda c?

im not looking for a dyno queen or bragging rights i just know that 125 ft lbs and 200whp is possible from 1595 cc and i want something i can run the **** out of at buttonwillow and vegas. 200hp is more interesting when the front of the block says b16a 5768201

thanks for the help
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #10  
xEnderx's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
From: Peein in yo momz butt
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

Not sure.....I'd do searches and compare the specs on the 3 cam sets. If I recall correctly the Jun 3's did very well on a 16A head with SMSP header. Try doing an search for it, but thats the direction I would start looking in.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #11  
Rollo Lawson's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
From: T Dot
Default

Roger Foo made 193whp, or so. and the main reason he made it was the headwork. i believe Omni did the work. oh yeah, Foo only had s2s1's, and, a sick f.d. to get that 16 to sing. g/l with the project
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 08:24 PM
  #12  
xDicktonesx's Avatar
Thread Starter
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Default Re: (B16C1)

thanks. as soon as i heard the power number i knew it had to be headwork. time to start talking to portflow. he did omnis 200hp b16 head. apparently its "all in the angles" sounds like a sick valve job.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #13  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: (CRXofPain)

stage 3's would be too big for a 1.6L in my opinion... omniman used m22's too reach the 200whp mark i believe
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 03:53 AM
  #14  
EG92's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: 909, CA
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

for the money you cant beat the s2s2's for your setup
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 09:06 AM
  #15  
xDicktonesx's Avatar
Thread Starter
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (EG92)

he didnt usae rockets he used dynamic stage a. waitll the dvd comes out.

i just want something bigger than a skunk2 stage2. im goign to go forth with the headwork. and i think 11.8:1 is enuff comp to run something larger.

im not dismissing info that i dont want to hear as incorrect or anything i just think theres a happier medium between s2s2 and say a s2 pro stage 3 or bc5.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 09:13 AM
  #16  
UncleD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,465
Likes: 4
From: GO PACKERS
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

Steve was using the Dynamic Autosports cams, but he switched them out for the M22's to get him past 200. I would be really concerned about valve to piston clearence with a S2S3 since you have milled the head. 12.8 is a TON of lift, I would opt for the M22 with your motor set up..they would absolutely rip. A Jun 3, S2S2, or S2 Pro 1 would work well also. M22's LOVE B16's
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #17  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRXofPain &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">he didnt usae rockets he used dynamic stage a. waitll the dvd comes out.

i just want something bigger than a skunk2 stage2. im goign to go forth with the headwork. and i think 11.8:1 is enuff comp to run something larger.

im not dismissing info that i dont want to hear as incorrect or anything i just think theres a happier medium between s2s2 and say a s2 pro stage 3 or bc5.</TD></TR></TABLE>

he did used dynmics..but then changed em out and gained with the m22's..thats what he told me anyway
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #18  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRXofPain &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">he didnt usae rockets he used dynamic stage a. waitll the dvd comes out.

i just want something bigger than a skunk2 stage2. im goign to go forth with the headwork. and i think 11.8:1 is enuff comp to run something larger.

im not dismissing info that i dont want to hear as incorrect or anything i just think theres a happier medium between s2s2 and say a s2 pro stage 3 or bc5.</TD></TR></TABLE>

and i dont think a pro stage 3 has been released yet..has it even been made?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 09:31 AM
  #19  
xDicktonesx's Avatar
Thread Starter
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (GOLDBERG)

i meant pro 2. sorry. typo. where can i get m22 without gettign the valvetrain with it? or is that a no-go. also...is the m22 an entirely new concept or is ther something very very close if not identical out there? i heard the june 3 and s2s2 are identical. im not trying to take away from the rocket guys at all. just kinda would liek to know.

Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #20  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

try searchin around.. boosted_hybrid had some for sale ...might be others out there with em fs
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #21  
xEnderx's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
From: Peein in yo momz butt
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (clean rice)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clean rice &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">M22's LOVE B16's </TD></TR></TABLE>


Thought you said it was overcammed?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #22  
DonF's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 1
From: Atl. Beach, fl, duval
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (xEnderx)

The Pro3+ is available.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 12:18 PM
  #23  
UncleD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,465
Likes: 4
From: GO PACKERS
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (xEnderx)

Mine is overcammed right now, but only because I am TRYING to run the stock ecu, injectors, timing and header right now
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #24  
xEnderx's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
From: Peein in yo momz butt
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (clean rice)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clean rice &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Mine is overcammed right now, but only because I am TRYING to run the stock ecu, injectors, timing and header right now </TD></TR></TABLE>


Ah.....gotcha.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 12:21 PM
  #25  
UncleD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,465
Likes: 4
From: GO PACKERS
Default Re: s2s3 too much with no headwork? (CRXofPain)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRXofPain &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">is the m22 an entirely new concept or is ther something very very close if not identical out there?</TD></TR></TABLE>

The M22's and S2 Pro 1's, depending on what motor, build very similar horsepower. I like the duration of the M22's for a B16, they give it an awesome top end pull. The S2 Pro 3's are only available to "certain" people. I read somewhere that Dave isn't going to sell them to just anyone, like a full blown race cam only.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:52 PM.