Edelbrock Vs. ITR Cams for turbo use

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Aug 4, 2005 | 08:08 PM

delectric

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 42

Likes: 0

From: PARIS

Edelbrock Vs. ITR Cams for turbo use

Somebody know the differences between those cams. Edelbock's have two versions in stock for Street use 15 hp gain and Rally 30 hp gain, is that real? or ITR has better characteristics for turbo uses.

Thanks anyway.

Aug 4, 2005 | 09:45 PM

SFWD 1934

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 878

Likes: 0

From: Nor Cal

Re: Edelbrock Vs. ITR Cams for turbo use (delectric)

Personally I would not run anything from Edelbrock. Not only for the reason of what they pulled to people like JG, and BBK, etc. Their tech support really sucks *** to say the least. They know almost ZERO about import anything!!

Be careful!!

Jason

Aug 4, 2005 | 10:12 PM

Mase

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Dec 2001

Posts: 7,139

Likes: 0

From: The Swamp, FL

Re: Edelbrock Vs. ITR Cams for turbo use (SFWD 1934)

take a look at top power cars on my website, every single one of them run OEM cams.....

ITR's are the way to go.

Aug 4, 2005 | 10:21 PM

Boostfed

New User

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 12,296

Likes: 0

Re: Edelbrock Vs. ITR Cams for turbo use (Mase)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mase »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">take a look at top power cars on my website, every single one of them run OEM cams.....

ITR's are the way to go. </TD></TR></TABLE>

:I'm with stupid: