I read that article Ive been wanting to read in SCC and Hasports H22 CRX only pulled a 14.1 1/4!? Whats up with that! It did pull 1.03 G's though. So take that all who thought it wouldnt handle worth a ****!

Anyhoo, any thoughts as to why it ran so slow....?

 

just think with minimal bolt ons and slicks a low 13 sec run is there for ya

 

Well, with a 50 shot, exhaust, intake AND slicks it ran a 13.5.......

....am I the only one dissapointed?

 

Yeah thats prett sad, are they making a h/f mount kit now

 

kit will be out shortly....that was an article of the production kit

 

did the h22 only have bolt-ons when it ran a 14.1 or was it stock?.....i cant even think of why it ran that in a crx......but at the track one night i watched a boosted lude run a 14.1.

 

an H22 mated to a close gear ratio of a B16 transmission will yield even lower times. There was someone back on the board who made transmission adapter plates.

-Jon

 

^^^not concerned with a b series tranny, concerned as to why everyone claims that a crx with those mods should run way faster than it did.....

 

Somethings not right. My stock h22 ek will beat that.

 

wow, i thought h22's with basic bolton's ran like low 11's. That sucks hard.

They should turbo it!!

 

I don't believe it. Those car mags are pretty gay.. maybe they made a typo or didn't get their **** straight.

I believe member 2point2 is in the 12s with his and some other canadian guy ran 12s too. Someone with an H22 CRX is bound to jump in here

 

the fagotry!!

hella slow

mags = teh rice

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by explictness &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow, i thought h22's with basic bolton's ran like low 11's. That sucks hard.

They should turbo it!! </TD></TR></TABLE>

Ya man cuz the bolt-ons are all APC yO!

11's... ha... you hang out with idiots.

 

what about traction, did it give 60ft times or the mph of the 1/4 mile run? it should definetly run faster than a 14.1 in a crx.

 

man what is up with that 14.1

 

they also spent over 3K on the suspension

 

Somethings wrong. That time is embarassing.

 

Maybe the wheel man can't drive. What was the trap speed?

 

Ouch. I hit a 14.1 with a basically stock B16. Something has to be wrong with that setup.

 

scc sucks at driving, what was the trap.

 

With a 1/4 time like that they shouldn't have even posted it. If "regular" drivers with bigger cars with more stuff in it than they need can run those times w/ an H22, any professional driver should be running low to mid 13s no problem. I just hope they had a crappy engine or something. I just hope they were using the older 92-95 H22. Even so, a 20-30 hp and 30 lb/tq jump over the GSR should be yeilding better results.
Conclusion - 1 or more of the following:

Bad Driver
Bad Weather/Road Conditions (I highly doubt)
Bad Transmission
Bad Tires (I also highly doubt)


Also, does anyone have that magazine article? A scan would be right now.


Modified by knwldge54 at 7:56 PM 7/27/2005

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by explictness &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow, i thought h22's with basic bolton's ran like low 11's. That sucks hard.

They should turbo it!! </TD></TR></TABLE>

were you serious?

 

top of the hymlayers perhaps?

my new thought on the matter but 14.1 is a laughing stock.

SCC probly did that cause hondas arn't the fad but its cool to hate on them few years ago they'd write about low 12s bolt on b16s.

 

H series transmission gearing SUCKS Which is why there is a H to B series transmission adapter kit. http://www.quartersportsdrag.com
They will be dragging their cars on the 30th and posting results on monday/tuesday after. From what i hear, there are quite a few H2B CRX's there, many of which are in the 12's.

 

Brian gts on this board, just ask him.