Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

GSR tranny on LS worthit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 09:39 PM
  #1  
Mr_Moos's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Wa, USA
Default GSR tranny on LS worthit

99 GS want to put a GSR tranny on it is it worth it will it give me a noticible boost in power?
accleration?
For those that have LS's w/ GSR trannies how much did it shave off your 1/4 mile times?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 09:46 PM
  #2  
projectTeG's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,421
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fl
Default

no power increase, but it will accelerate alot faster
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 10:21 PM
  #3  
Funkin Flux's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: 818. 909. 760, ca, USA
Default

any LS owners that have done this id like to hear also.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 11:57 PM
  #4  
apok's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX, USA
Default Re: (eonflux)

For autocrossing, an SI LSD or Type R LSD tranny would be the best due to extreme acceleration in all gears and since top speed isn't necessary. For an all motor car at the quarter mile, a GSR tranny would shave maybe .25 off your time. An LS tranny is best for turbo or supercharger due to the long gears and since turbo will make the LS feel like a Type R.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 12:01 AM
  #5  
aeon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1
From: ca
Default

Do a search on this. A lot of poeple doing the swap really like it. Makes the car feel faster because of the shorter gearing. First and second gear is teh same as an ls though. If you're going for boost, then the gsr tranny would be a good choice but if you want to go na then the b16 tranny would be a good choice. Only thing bad about the b16 tranny is the high rev on freeways.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 01:43 AM
  #6  
old_school_dohcvtec's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: GSR tranny on LS worthit (Mr_Moos)

i think you will like the shorter gears, a b18c or b16a tranny would definitely be a good upgrade on an LS motor
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 02:05 AM
  #7  
PaChiLa Leader's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default Re: GSR tranny on LS worthit (Mr_Moos)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr_Moos &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">99 GS want to put a GSR tranny on it is it worth it will it give me a noticible boost in power?
accleration?
For those that have LS's w/ GSR trannies how much did it shave off your 1/4 mile times?</TD></TR></TABLE>

it's worth it.. i had it on my old setup and i love it..
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 06:56 AM
  #8  
boosted k20's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 1
From: new york, n.y., u.s.
Default Re: GSR tranny on LS worthit (PaChiLa Leader)

hell yea it's worth it. i just put a GSR tranny in my LS and my car never pulled like that before. 3rd gear is the shitty gear on the LS tranny, with the GSR tranny the car just moves like crazy through all gears
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 07:05 AM
  #9  
Uncle Ben's's Avatar
Cogent Argument Enthusiast
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 0
From: Solving riddles, Gotham
Default Re: (aeon)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aeon &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Do a search on this. A lot of poeple doing the swap really like it. Makes the car feel faster because of the shorter gearing. First and second gear is teh same as an ls though. If you're going for boost, then the gsr tranny would be a good choice but if you want to go na then the b16 tranny would be a good choice. Only thing bad about the b16 tranny is the high rev on freeways.</TD></TR></TABLE>

how high would i be revving on the interstate with a gsr tranny if i decided to get it? my ls is already over 3500; i like getting 30-38 mpg on the highway.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 08:55 AM
  #10  
lVlemphizStylez's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee/Miami, Fl, USA
Default Re: (benb18a)

im at 4200 with a b16...going 80
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #11  
aeon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1
From: ca
Default

I think it's around 4000-4500 when going 80mph..
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #12  
lVlemphizStylez's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee/Miami, Fl, USA
Default Re: (aeon)

nah it shouldnt reach 4500 going 80...4500 is around like 85..
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #13  
maniefrizzle's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: BayArea, CA
Default Re: (aeon)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aeon &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think it's around 4000-4500 when going 80mph..</TD></TR></TABLE>

damn 4 to 4.5k on the freeway? that sounds kinda nuts.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #14  
Uncle Ben's's Avatar
Cogent Argument Enthusiast
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 0
From: Solving riddles, Gotham
Default Re: (maniefrizzle)

im at 3700-3800 at 80 mph.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #15  
Finger Lickin' good's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 0
From: Westlake Villa, CA, USA
Default Re: (benb18a)

ya, seriously. My ls im at 3300 @ 80. This is like the one big draw back I see. I personally wouldnt want my ls reving that much. But hell, what harm will it do, 9.2 c/r is nothing.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 10:06 AM
  #16  
Uncle Ben's's Avatar
Cogent Argument Enthusiast
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 0
From: Solving riddles, Gotham
Default Re: (D-CeReaL#4)

youre only at 3300? my ls is 37-3800 at 80
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #17  
Mr.DC2's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default Re: (benb18a)

your highway limit is 80mph? in canada, our freeways limit us to 110km/h at most which is like 65-70mph.

for reference sakes, i'm at ~4000rpm at 120km/h so its not that bad.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #18  
full Circling's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 2
From: That's the wrong tone... I'm Skunk2 certified.
Default Re: (benb18a)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by benb18a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">youre only at 3300? my ls is 37-3800 at 80 </TD></TR></TABLE>

you probobly need a new clutch. mine did the same thing before i replaced it.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 12:56 PM
  #19  
jasonw's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA, USA
Default Re: (Mr.DC2)

The limit is usually 65 and sometimes 70 in the US. That doesn't have much to do with how fast these guys drives...

I think it depends on how much you want to spend on the car. I would rather put the tranny money towards a turbo and would get the SI tranny if anything since it seems to be cheaper.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #20  
Uncle Ben's's Avatar
Cogent Argument Enthusiast
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 0
From: Solving riddles, Gotham
Default Re: (^^whatnoobsearchthenGTFO)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ^^whatnoobsearchthenGTFO &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

you probobly need a new clutch. mine did the same thing before i replaced it.</TD></TR></TABLE>

i highly doubt it. i have NEVER burned out a clutch on any of my cars, and fellow teg owners that have driven my car always say stuff like "i wish my clutch was as stiff as yours", and i dont really beat on my car. ive only adjusted it once in the 20 months ive owned the car, and the freeplay hasnt gone anywhere; i dont do burnouts and very rarely beat on my car. my dad has replaced several clutches in his time, and says mine is just fine.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #21  
shermanyang's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 1
From: St.Paul, MN
Default Re: (apok)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by apok &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">For autocrossing, an SI LSD or Type R LSD tranny would be the best due to extreme acceleration in all gears and since top speed isn't necessary. For an all motor car at the quarter mile, a GSR tranny would shave maybe .25 off your time. An LS tranny is best for turbo or supercharger due to the long gears and since turbo will make the LS feel like a Type R.</TD></TR></TABLE>

and how do you explain this? have you even experienced a turbo LS before? have you ever tried the different tranny setups? if not then you're giving out totally FALSE information. no matter the setup, no matter how much power you're making, shorter gears will always accelerate you faster! an LS tranny is NOT best for FI. the longer gears give your motor/turbo more load, therefore you're in boost longer but in no way are you accelerating faster.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by lVlemphizStylez &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nah it shouldnt reach 4500 going 80...4500 is around like 85..</TD></TR></TABLE>


your tach is off. a b16 tranny @ 80mph is sitting at 4.5k. get a digital read out from your ecu and you'll see.


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by benb18a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">youre only at 3300? my ls is 37-3800 at 80 </TD></TR></TABLE>

that's cause you've got a cable tranny. cable ls trannies have shorter gears(final drive that is) than hydro ones.


Modified by shermanyang at 5:41 PM 7/24/2005
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 01:15 PM
  #22  
Uncle Ben's's Avatar
Cogent Argument Enthusiast
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 0
From: Solving riddles, Gotham
Default Re: (jasonw)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jasonw &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The limit is usually 65 and sometimes 70 in the US. That doesn't have much to do with how fast these guys drives...
I think it depends on how much you want to spend on the car. I would rather put the tranny money towards a turbo and would get the SI tranny if anything since it seems to be cheaper.</TD></TR></TABLE>

good point. while i was driving 75 mph last weekend, there were plenty of asshat soccermoms in their suvs flying by me like i was standing still, going atleast 90, getting about 10 mpg.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #23  
projectTeG's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,421
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fl
Default Re: (shermanyang)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by shermanyang &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

that's cause you've got a cable tranny. cable ls trannies have shorter gears than hydro ones.</TD></TR></TABLE>

speaking of that my ls with the cable trannies revs to about 3800-3900...lol
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #24  
jasonw's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA, USA
Default Re: (shermanyang)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by shermanyang &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">an LS tranny is NOT best for FI. the longer gears give your motor/turbo more load, therefore you're in boost longer but in no way are you accelerating faster.</TD></TR></TABLE>

You know if the gearing is too low, the traction can be an issue too. I think you have to balance it out with the amount of power you plan to make. For low boost, the LS tranny probably won't have any advantages.

You also don't want to assume the guy is only going to drag race and be full throttle all the time.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #25  
shermanyang's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 1
From: St.Paul, MN
Default Re: (jasonw)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jasonw &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

You know if the gearing is too low, the traction can be an issue too. I think you have to balance it out with the amount of power you plan to make. For low boost, the LS tranny probably won't have any advantages.

You also don't want to assume the guy is only going to drag race and be full throttle all the time.</TD></TR></TABLE>


yes traction maybe an issue, but there's such things as traction control and slicks. and what advantages does an LS tranny have except for better gas mileage? if you understood or have tried out the different combinations on a turbo'd ls you'd understand. high boost, low boost, no boost the LS' advantage is the same, better gasmileage(and higher top end for those who care to go over 160mph). i would think that my 380whp on pump gas LS would be considered high boost and a good example.

and i wasn't assuming that the guy is going to be drag racing or at full throttle. where'd you come up with that idea? for anyone who's mindset is on performance they'd get the ITR or B16 tranny with their setup. for anyone else who's in the middle such as myself, they'd go with a GSR tranny. gears aren't too long nor too short. if you're gonna granny your car or have over 500+whp then sure go ahead and keep your LS tranny.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:07 PM.