Cam install question B16A with BC IV
2 quick questions about this install.
Would I need newer LMA I have a 1st gen B16 head
Also when I adjust the valves do I go with the same clearences as stock...
Thanks
Would I need newer LMA I have a 1st gen B16 head
Also when I adjust the valves do I go with the same clearences as stock...
Thanks
ummmmm......... won't you have to spin the 16 to 10K++ w/itbs and atleast 12.5/1 c.r with those cams? i can't wait to see this dyno. LOL. lma's should be the last of your worries. you will have to be extremely accurate with this set up.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LSvtec delsol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well its actually B18 sleeved to 84.5 mm with CP 12.5 c/r pistons.... </TD></TR></TABLE>
well then, he's is criss. bc iv's and b16 should not be used in the same sentence. or, any huge cam and b16 for that matter. g/l with the project.
well then, he's is criss. bc iv's and b16 should not be used in the same sentence. or, any huge cam and b16 for that matter. g/l with the project.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16C1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well then, he's is criss. bc iv's and b16 should not be used in the same sentence. or, any huge cam and b16 for that matter. g/l with the project.</TD></TR></TABLE>
WTF?? Criss?? if you would learn to read I specified a B16 head no where's does it say B16 long block or B16 short block... FYI head is the upper portion of your motor with the valve train, cams, valves etc...
If there not designed for a B16 head what are they designed for a ITR head oh wait same head with a few exceptions....
I think idiots posting is part of the reason I've cut back off these forum....
WTF?? Criss?? if you would learn to read I specified a B16 head no where's does it say B16 long block or B16 short block... FYI head is the upper portion of your motor with the valve train, cams, valves etc...
If there not designed for a B16 head what are they designed for a ITR head oh wait same head with a few exceptions....
I think idiots posting is part of the reason I've cut back off these forum....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by zCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
WTF?? Criss?? if you would learn to read I specified a B16 head no where's does it say B16 long block or B16 short block... FYI head is the upper portion of your motor with the valve train, cams, valves etc...
If there not designed for a B16 head what are they designed for a ITR head oh wait same head with a few exceptions....
I think idiots posting is part of the reason I've cut back off these forum....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yah, you just have to read past the idiots.
I got my GSR LMA's off ebay for something like 45.00. Good insurance.
WTF?? Criss?? if you would learn to read I specified a B16 head no where's does it say B16 long block or B16 short block... FYI head is the upper portion of your motor with the valve train, cams, valves etc...
If there not designed for a B16 head what are they designed for a ITR head oh wait same head with a few exceptions....
I think idiots posting is part of the reason I've cut back off these forum....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yah, you just have to read past the idiots.
I got my GSR LMA's off ebay for something like 45.00. Good insurance.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16C1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
well then, he's is criss. bc iv's and b16 should not be used in the same sentence. or, any huge cam and b16 for that matter. g/l with the project.</TD></TR></TABLE>
bd4's are not that HUGE ... omniman made 200 whp with m22s on a b16 and they are kinda close too bd4's..soo all wise critic..whatsup?there have also been a number of people reaching the 200whp mark or veryyy close on b16's with a streetable powerband and big cams ...so keep laughing like a ignorant fool..nobody cares what you think
well then, he's is criss. bc iv's and b16 should not be used in the same sentence. or, any huge cam and b16 for that matter. g/l with the project.</TD></TR></TABLE>
bd4's are not that HUGE ... omniman made 200 whp with m22s on a b16 and they are kinda close too bd4's..soo all wise critic..whatsup?there have also been a number of people reaching the 200whp mark or veryyy close on b16's with a streetable powerband and big cams ...so keep laughing like a ignorant fool..nobody cares what you think
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by snowseeker »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yah, you just have to read past the idiots.
I got my GSR LMA's off ebay for something like 45.00. Good insurance.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GOLDBERG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">...so keep laughing like a ignorant fool..nobody cares what you think </TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by zCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think idiots posting is part of the reason I've cut back off these forum....</TD></TR></TABLE>
the thread title is bc iv's in b16. not b16 head. as for the guys calling me a fool, eat a dick. if you think bc iv's are not huge for a b16, then you are the fool. it is a fact that you'll have to rev up to 10K with those cams. as for the b16 making close to 200whp, it peaked at 9200rpm, was soggy in the mid range, and it was done on d/a cams if i remember correctly. anyway, opinions are like ********. its funny, somebody mentioned that its going into a 2L, i corrected myself and u guys still talk ****? LOL, get over it, children.
Yah, you just have to read past the idiots.
I got my GSR LMA's off ebay for something like 45.00. Good insurance.
</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GOLDBERG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">...so keep laughing like a ignorant fool..nobody cares what you think </TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by zCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think idiots posting is part of the reason I've cut back off these forum....</TD></TR></TABLE>
the thread title is bc iv's in b16. not b16 head. as for the guys calling me a fool, eat a dick. if you think bc iv's are not huge for a b16, then you are the fool. it is a fact that you'll have to rev up to 10K with those cams. as for the b16 making close to 200whp, it peaked at 9200rpm, was soggy in the mid range, and it was done on d/a cams if i remember correctly. anyway, opinions are like ********. its funny, somebody mentioned that its going into a 2L, i corrected myself and u guys still talk ****? LOL, get over it, children.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by veeetec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow, I don't think I'd ever have the nerve to actually criticize a 200 whp b16, that's some pretty impressive **** no matter how you get it done. Geez...</TD></TR></TABLE>
believe me, its no dis. i respect any 200whp b16, its just that displacement owns. if you can make big numbers with the 16, by all means go for it. but, we all know size matters. i'm sure Omni will admit that. lastly, i believe a Hytech header was run on that 200whp combo. that header is like $1200 alone. 1.8L's and up make 200whp on generic, off shelf headers. my point is, to achieve high specific output on a 1.6L is money, and most of the people on here, or in the real world for that matter are trying to get there best bang for the buck and staying 1.6L is strictly love not logic.
believe me, its no dis. i respect any 200whp b16, its just that displacement owns. if you can make big numbers with the 16, by all means go for it. but, we all know size matters. i'm sure Omni will admit that. lastly, i believe a Hytech header was run on that 200whp combo. that header is like $1200 alone. 1.8L's and up make 200whp on generic, off shelf headers. my point is, to achieve high specific output on a 1.6L is money, and most of the people on here, or in the real world for that matter are trying to get there best bang for the buck and staying 1.6L is strictly love not logic.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16C1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
the thread title is bc iv's in b16. not b16 head. as for the guys calling me a fool, eat a dick. if you think bc iv's are not huge for a b16, then you are the fool. it is a fact that you'll have to rev up to 10K with those cams. as for the b16 making close to 200whp, it peaked at 9200rpm, was soggy in the mid range, and it was done on d/a cams if i remember correctly. anyway, opinions are like ********. its funny, somebody mentioned that its going into a 2L, i corrected myself and u guys still talk ****? LOL, get over it, children.</TD></TR></TABLE>
actually, as i recall, omni used the dynamic cams and made 196 or something...switched to m22's and made 206.
the thread title is bc iv's in b16. not b16 head. as for the guys calling me a fool, eat a dick. if you think bc iv's are not huge for a b16, then you are the fool. it is a fact that you'll have to rev up to 10K with those cams. as for the b16 making close to 200whp, it peaked at 9200rpm, was soggy in the mid range, and it was done on d/a cams if i remember correctly. anyway, opinions are like ********. its funny, somebody mentioned that its going into a 2L, i corrected myself and u guys still talk ****? LOL, get over it, children.</TD></TR></TABLE>
actually, as i recall, omni used the dynamic cams and made 196 or something...switched to m22's and made 206.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
supercleanek9
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Nov 18, 2002 09:53 PM





