0-60 and 1/4 mile times on 91-93 NSX?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Lookincrazy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I looked on the net and couldnt find anything useful.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Then you didn't look in the Technical - Performance area of the NSX FAQ (see the first topic on this forum).
Most magazine tests of the five-speed had 0-60 5.2-5.4, and 1/4 mile 13.7-13.9. A few tests were done with an automatic and typically got 5.8 and 14.4.
Then you didn't look in the Technical - Performance area of the NSX FAQ (see the first topic on this forum).
Most magazine tests of the five-speed had 0-60 5.2-5.4, and 1/4 mile 13.7-13.9. A few tests were done with an automatic and typically got 5.8 and 14.4.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nsxtasy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Then you didn't look in the Technical - Performance area of the NSX FAQ (see the first topic on this forum).
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Then you didn't look in the Technical - Performance area of the NSX FAQ (see the first topic on this forum).
</TD></TR></TABLE>
on of my firend's 92 hit 13.3 all stock, and my friend with a 98 hit 12.9 all stock.
I find that a lot of people underate the performance of an NSX, just because it's a V6 and only has 290 hp (the 97 up)
They say the NSX is one of the best comsumer produced race cars you can buy (at least for track use).
I find that a lot of people underate the performance of an NSX, just because it's a V6 and only has 290 hp (the 97 up)
They say the NSX is one of the best comsumer produced race cars you can buy (at least for track use).
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nsxtasy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Most magazine tests of the five-speed had 0-60 5.2-5.4, and 1/4 mile 13.7-13.9.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The six-speed NSX-T typically was 4.9 and 13.3. Take off another two to three tenths if it's one of the rare fixed-roof coupes.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Freshazzburu »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">on of my firend's 92 hit 13.3 all stock, and my friend with a 98 hit 12.9 all stock.</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's not surprising. Remember, magazines use standard procedures so that their results are consistent and repeatable. Some of those procedures make them slower than a good driver can achieve at the dragstrip: bone stock cars, stock tires, stock tire inflation pressures, all standard equipment in the car (including spare tire, etc), full fluids (gas tank), etc. That's why it's common to hear reports of cars (not just the NSX, but all cars) often doing better than the magazines report.
The six-speed NSX-T typically was 4.9 and 13.3. Take off another two to three tenths if it's one of the rare fixed-roof coupes.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Freshazzburu »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">on of my firend's 92 hit 13.3 all stock, and my friend with a 98 hit 12.9 all stock.</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's not surprising. Remember, magazines use standard procedures so that their results are consistent and repeatable. Some of those procedures make them slower than a good driver can achieve at the dragstrip: bone stock cars, stock tires, stock tire inflation pressures, all standard equipment in the car (including spare tire, etc), full fluids (gas tank), etc. That's why it's common to hear reports of cars (not just the NSX, but all cars) often doing better than the magazines report.
Trending Topics
91-94 nsxs do about mid to low 13s depending on the driver. The newer ones are suppose to be in high 12's if you look at the best motoring videos. You can easily build the 91-94 to be fast since they are obd 1. I was considering a 97 + nsx and then found out that the 91-94's are the best ones to have. For one the hardtop in which I have is lighter in weight (150lbs) and firmer than the T tops.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nsxtasy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The six-speed NSX-T typically was 4.9 and 13.3. Take off another two to three tenths if it's one of the rare fixed-roof coupes.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I was just watching an old episode of car and driver, and they have the 6 speed clocked in at 0-60: 4.5 and 1/4 mile: 12.9
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MyWayIsSideways
»</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Best Motoring clocked an NSX-R at 13.08
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i also just watched the best motoring episode with the nsx-r vs gtr in drag, and the nsx-r was clocked at 12.8.
It is unbeleivable acceleration for a 3000+ lbs car with only 290hp
The six-speed NSX-T typically was 4.9 and 13.3. Take off another two to three tenths if it's one of the rare fixed-roof coupes.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I was just watching an old episode of car and driver, and they have the 6 speed clocked in at 0-60: 4.5 and 1/4 mile: 12.9
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MyWayIsSideways
»</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Best Motoring clocked an NSX-R at 13.08
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i also just watched the best motoring episode with the nsx-r vs gtr in drag, and the nsx-r was clocked at 12.8.
It is unbeleivable acceleration for a 3000+ lbs car with only 290hp
holy crap, you know 2 ppl with nsx's?
also, in the roaring vtec best motoring video, i believe they actually hit 12.7 in either a type s zero or the new nsx-r... its been a while tho since i've watched it.
also, in the roaring vtec best motoring video, i believe they actually hit 12.7 in either a type s zero or the new nsx-r... its been a while tho since i've watched it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







