2006 Honda Crx
I hear that if it does come out it won't be here so i guess we will have to import it but that is if it happens. i saw an article with picture somewhere but now i can't remember. but i do remember the headlights looking like the rsx but it was a drawing not a picture
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rob. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">They brought back the retro Mustang, the dodge charger + Pontiac GTO...retro ford thunderbird....lol
Why not the crx ?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Those were all 'performance' cars back in the day.
Honda wont bring it back. That picture has been around for years too.
Why not the crx ?
</TD></TR></TABLE>Those were all 'performance' cars back in the day.
Honda wont bring it back. That picture has been around for years too.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fujii13 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it's called the "insight". look it up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fujii13 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it's called the "insight". look it up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
LMAO... If the 'insight' was a 'crx' then it would be called "crx", therefore 'insight' is not a 'crx'..
if you get ma drift.
LMAO... If the 'insight' was a 'crx' then it would be called "crx", therefore 'insight' is not a 'crx'..
if you get ma drift.
lol, you guys should have read up on what some other guy and myself said in the last one of these threads... short and simple.....
that blue "CRX" concept became the RSX. look at it compaired to the RSX. And even better is that honda is a economical car company, not a sports car company. they already have the S2K, the nsx, the rsx and the civic SI. but the sales on all the above are not going so well....most people want hondas because they are reliable and get 30-35 mpg. not because they can put a turbo kit on it and it has 200 HP
that blue "CRX" concept became the RSX. look at it compaired to the RSX. And even better is that honda is a economical car company, not a sports car company. they already have the S2K, the nsx, the rsx and the civic SI. but the sales on all the above are not going so well....most people want hondas because they are reliable and get 30-35 mpg. not because they can put a turbo kit on it and it has 200 HP
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mr_valentino20032000 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">.most people want hondas because they are reliable and get 30-35 mpg. not because they can put a turbo kit on it and it has 200 HP</TD></TR></TABLE>
EXACTAMENTO ! That's why Honduh should bring back the econobox Crx+ hatchback !!! Not these performance cars or gas guzzling trucks !!!!
EXACTAMENTO ! That's why Honduh should bring back the econobox Crx+ hatchback !!! Not these performance cars or gas guzzling trucks !!!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fujii13 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it's called the "insight". look it up.</TD></TR></TABLE> i believe its been said before but yeah thats the econo box CRX plat form
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rob. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">here are spy pics of the future Crx..you saw it here first. 2 door. 2 seater !

</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats not a CRX

</TD></TR></TABLE>thats not a CRX
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nerologic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
thats not a CRX
</TD></TR></TABLE>
that and it is fugly... I wouldn't drive that even if honda paid me... I like my crx, and wouldn't get a new one unless they brought back the original design the way it was and leave it alone.
thats not a CRX
</TD></TR></TABLE>that and it is fugly... I wouldn't drive that even if honda paid me... I like my crx, and wouldn't get a new one unless they brought back the original design the way it was and leave it alone.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nerologic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
thats not a CRX
</TD></TR></TABLE>
how do you know ? there's no name to it.. lol Just a honda concept car
thats not a CRX
</TD></TR></TABLE>how do you know ? there's no name to it.. lol Just a honda concept car
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rob. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
how do you know ? there's no name to it.. lol Just a honda concept car </TD></TR></TABLE>
when they make cars again, correct me if im wrong but they try to keep the general "style" "cues" etc. of the original car
which that thing doesnt have
how do you know ? there's no name to it.. lol Just a honda concept car </TD></TR></TABLE>
when they make cars again, correct me if im wrong but they try to keep the general "style" "cues" etc. of the original car
which that thing doesnt have
evem if honda wanted to remake the crx/hatch, they couldn't.
do you think they wanted to switch to door mounted seat belts?
do you think they wanted to have to redesign all the molds and machines to make the door panels, and come up with more parts, etc?
they were forced by the us gov. to do that, because it is a supplemental restraint system.
there have been MANY more laws passed, that are bigger than just door seat belts since then.
they'd have to redesign the whole thing and it would end up weighing a lot.
do you think they wanted to switch to door mounted seat belts?
do you think they wanted to have to redesign all the molds and machines to make the door panels, and come up with more parts, etc?
they were forced by the us gov. to do that, because it is a supplemental restraint system.
there have been MANY more laws passed, that are bigger than just door seat belts since then.
they'd have to redesign the whole thing and it would end up weighing a lot.



Why remake the perfect economy car.