Another PR3 vs PWO thread
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
Another PR3 vs PWO thread
I have searched through the archives as well.
Just wondering if anyone has definately found a redline diff. between the 2. I just switched from a PW0 to a PR#. The difference I have noticed is a definate smoother idle. Seemingly smoother/acceleration. My VTEC engagement went from 5200 w/ the PW0 to 45oo w/ the PR3. And if you are just cruising at low rpm and gradualy get to 4500 slowly, VTEC does not seem to engage.
Just wondering if anyone has definately found a redline diff. between the 2. I just switched from a PW0 to a PR#. The difference I have noticed is a definate smoother idle. Seemingly smoother/acceleration. My VTEC engagement went from 5200 w/ the PW0 to 45oo w/ the PR3. And if you are just cruising at low rpm and gradualy get to 4500 slowly, VTEC does not seem to engage.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
Re: (kaoss_11)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kaoss_11 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think its all in your head</TD></TR></TABLE>
Id disagree on that one. The car goes straight to 800rpm within a few seconds after cranking now, where with the pw0 it took longer.
The vtec crossover has definately changed, which I read others had the same thing, some just for some reason had it the other way around. The car overall just seems to run better.
Id disagree on that one. The car goes straight to 800rpm within a few seconds after cranking now, where with the pw0 it took longer.
The vtec crossover has definately changed, which I read others had the same thing, some just for some reason had it the other way around. The car overall just seems to run better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post