All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #1  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec?

what the hell is wrong here...cause something is drastically wrong......



bigger pic at http://massj1.homestead.com/files/fuckup_dyno.JPG




Modified by GOLDBERG at 5:34 AM 5/2/2005
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:07 PM
  #2  
HXMan's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,698
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

pics not working...
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

setup is....
lsvtec
jg cam gears
skunk2 im
pr3 pistons
an-r header
gsr tb bored by maxbore
aemitr cai
m22 cams
rocket valvetrain
hondata s200
370cc injectors
walbro fuel pump
fpr



Modified by GOLDBERG at 9:26 PM 5/4/2005
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #4  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

what about now?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #5  
HXMan's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,698
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

Needs tuning? Setup looks pretty nice.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:38 PM
  #6  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (HXMan)

thats just the problem..that is after tuning..before tuning it was even worse... a bigger pic is available at http://massj1.homestead.com/files/fuckup_dyno.JPG
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #7  
HXMan's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,698
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

Hmmm....I'd say take it to another tuner, and make sure there are no other problems with the engine like bad compression, bent/burnt valves, timing belt off a tooth or something.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #8  
PyroProblem's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (HXMan)

do a compression test. Is this a freshly built engine?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #9  
Grand's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: halifax, N.S, canada
Default

a stock ls will lay down close to those torque numbers lol
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #10  
non-VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

what you using for engine managment?

you can expect 370cc injectors to run right off the stock ECU program......

looking at that torque curve i would say your have some serious fuel issues....
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #11  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (non-VTEC)

um i stated above...hondata...fuel at wot is round 13.2ish....partial like 14.7...cam gears untouched..maybe the dudes wideband is off?

oh yeah another thing is compression is only like 175-185 across the board.. but engine doesnt smoke bad or anything
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #12  
Grand's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: halifax, N.S, canada
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GOLDBERG &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">um i stated above...hondata...fuel at wot is round 13.2ish....partial like 14.7...cam gears untouched..maybe the dudes wideband is off?

oh yeah another thing is compression is only like 175-185 across the board.. but engine doesnt smoke bad or anything </TD></TR></TABLE>


that compression is low for pr3 pistons you must be experincing blow buy did you go with oversize pistons and rings or just hone and use 81mm again
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 03:18 PM
  #13  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (LG_R32)

i was thinkin rings too..but it isnt smoking like a ****.......
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 03:38 PM
  #14  
butters's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: Newark, CA
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

do a leakdown yet?
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 06:00 PM
  #15  
ghost turtle's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: Portland, TN, usa
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (LG_R32)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LG_R32 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">that compression is low for pr3 pistons you must be experincing blow buy did you go with oversize pistons and rings or just hone and use 81mm again </TD></TR></TABLE>

i second that... my first attempt with the ls/vtec resulted in ok compression numbers but the #4 cylinder rings weren't setting because the cylinder was honed out too much... went with the oversized and problem solved.
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 07:18 PM
  #16  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GOLDBERG &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">um i stated above...hondata...fuel at wot is round 13.2ish....partial like 14.7...cam gears untouched..maybe the dudes wideband is off?

oh yeah another thing is compression is only like 175-185 across the board.. but engine doesnt smoke bad or anything </TD></TR></TABLE>

Well, I have an idea, and you even support my idea with the compression numbers. How can u call it tuned w/o touching the cam gears. You know that those cams might prefer a little advance or retard to get right in time. I dont have much experience with the m22's.

Also was the ignition timing set on the motor? Then i would try eliminating some overlap in teh cams, (advance exhaust more than intake) and see if you arent bleeding out your compression. (This was happening with my cams)

Also, do you have a milled head? Or two layer gasket? This will also require you to advance both intake and exhaust to get it in time.

If your dead sure that the cars in time, try to eliminate some overlap, or play with the cam gears a little and see if u can get the compression #'s to go up.

Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 08:31 PM
  #17  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (Used2beAb16)

yeah i told the tuner too adjust the cam gears..he just gave me a dumbass remark.....rocket says the cam gears might be off so to try the stock cam gears..
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #18  
onepoint6i's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,050
Likes: 1
From: Single track SD
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (CRXDX)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRXDX &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

i second that... my first attempt with the ls/vtec resulted in ok compression numbers but the #4 cylinder rings weren't setting because the cylinder was honed out too much... went with the oversized and problem solved.</TD></TR></TABLE>

it all depends..i've seen engines get a light hone on rebuild and the rings seated perfectly..i've even stuffed new rings without hone and they seated perfectly.....I have my money on cam gears being out of adjustment
Reply
Old May 2, 2005 | 12:03 PM
  #19  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

I wouldnt do the stock ones, i would just play with the ones u got a little. 1 or 2 degrees each way on the intake and do the same with the exhaust as the intake.

Also, once u find a good spot where they run and they are the same degrees advanced or retarded, try to advance or retard the exhaust 1 degree and see if it likes it or not.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 05:22 AM
  #20  
boosted hybrid's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 2
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GOLDBERG &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">oh yeah another thing is compression is only like 175-185 across the board.. but engine doesnt smoke bad or anything </TD></TR></TABLE>

175-185 compression is right around 9:1 compression. You need to leakdown the engine and determine where your compression is being lost. If any combustion chamber work was done on the head it will lose cc's and take away from the static compression. Make sure that you are TDC at the crank and cam gear.
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #21  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (boosted hybrid)

hmm well its all leaking from the rings...cylinder 1-3 is below 10% somewhere but cylinder #4 is about 20% leakage...would that account for the massive power loss?
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #22  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

I dont think you would lose 30 lbs of torque from that.
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #23  
sander's Avatar
2.7(p/t)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GOLDBERG &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hmm well its all leaking from the rings...cylinder 1-3 is below 10% somewhere but cylinder #4 is about 20% leakage...would that account for the massive power loss?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes. There are many builders that will junk the motor after 3%. (in higher end apps.)

-s
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 07:16 PM
  #24  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (sander)

well 10 percent is ok, 20 percent isnt good, Like i said i really wouldnt expect that much loss from it but i havent had a motor like that so i wouldnt know.
Reply
Old May 4, 2005 | 07:21 PM
  #25  
eg6hatch1's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Methuen, ma, us
Default Re: wtf???109ft/lbs with lsvtec? (GOLDBERG)

with some good tunning u should be good,, ur setup looks pretty good....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 AM.