i kno that there are t'bo and s'charger kits for the GSR integras, but is there anyone dat has decided to twincharge any as yet. i kno yall peeps would prefer one or the other but, if done properly and the block and stuff strong enuff, tink about de hp and torque numbas that u get outta dis engine.

reply wid yall thoughts and ideas

 

ahhh jeez

 

reply wiht ur thoughts and ideas? i htink ur a ****** moron. why don't u consider the proper spelling? doing a TT is almost as retarded as u because it would take a lot longer for it to spool

 

y bother?! this is only an inline four. there is no way there is goign to be enough gas to push that.....and search my friend so u wouldnt get flamed on...if i were u, put on a flame suit

 

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=829839

 

ive seen it down at etown...some glitzzy teg jrsc and a greddy kit i think....total show car...in my mind...just another whole set of problems that can occur....

 

it took me awhile jus to read wat u were sayin, heh guess im not used to that bopper stuff?

 

i think he was refering to supercharging and a turbo, which is gayer than twin turbo by a long shot. The really homo thing is that "yes" it has been done. I saw it in a magazine a couple years ago and almost vomited. I think i burned that magazine and have been suppressing the horrible memories till you brought it up just now. THanks you ****** Noob, now i'm gonna have ricer nightmares again.

 

This post was a day late for april fools day.....

 

I con smell de rize frum hurr.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FormulaGSR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i think he was refering to supercharging and a turbo, which is gayer than twin turbo by a long shot. The really homo thing is that "yes" it has been done. I saw it in a magazine a couple years ago and almost vomited. I think i burned that magazine and have been suppressing the horrible memories till you brought it up just now. THanks you ****** Noob, now i'm gonna have ricer nightmares again.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Why not explain WHY its so bad then?

 

Um i'm with everyone else on this man u are a MORON !!!

 

Im trying to get people to give reasons behind their thoughts rather than just say "IT SUCKS", which in turn leads other people to say "yeah it sucks!" without knowing why it sucks.

For everyone whos calling this guy an idiot and telling him hes a moron and doesnt know anything...not one person has explained why.

 

jesus i really need to start logging out of h-t. that had to have been my little brother

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rory Breaker &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Im trying to get people to give reasons behind their thoughts rather than just say "IT SUCKS", which in turn leads other people to say "yeah it sucks!" without knowing why it sucks.

For everyone whos calling this guy an idiot and telling him hes a moron and doesnt know anything...not one person has explained why.</TD></TR></TABLE>


why dont you explain why the idea doesnt suck.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Spoon-R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i know that there are turbo and supercharger kits for Integra GSR's, but is there anyone that has decided to twincharge their teg yet? I know you all probably prefer one or the other but, if done properly and the block and stuff strong enough, think about the hp and torque numbers that you could get out of this set-up.

reply with all thoughts and ideas</TD></TR></TABLE>

***edited with normal words, no stupid slang...

why not just put a massive turbo and run insane boost?? like all the pro's do right now.....

 

im just waiting to hear some opinions, no one is backing up their flaming

leave the guy alone, I'm sure you all wondered this at some point.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FormulaGSR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i think he was refering to supercharging and a turbo, which is gayer than twin turbo by a long shot. The really homo thing is that "yes" it has been done. I saw it in a magazine a couple years ago and almost vomited. I think i burned that magazine and have been suppressing the horrible memories till you brought it up just now. THanks you ****** Noob, now i'm gonna have ricer nightmares again.</TD></TR></TABLE>

lol

 

I dont think it's too bad of a question. When I first started tuning, I wondered the same thing. It would be bad *** if someone had a turbo and a supercharger working on their ride. Why not? If you had the money and if everything would work properly why wouldn't this be a good idea? Get the best of both worlds! Despite your spelling, I think this is a decent thread for a noob. Don't let these guys put you down spoon-r. They don't know you and you shouldn't care what peeps think of you, especially peeps that pre-judge you for your thoughts and ideas. Keep on dreamin bro and make it happen!!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Palmy Blue &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">LMAO @

Correct me if im wrong but I dont think he has took a side in this argument. He is just trying to get people to suport their opinon.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

You are 100% on the money.

There are lots of reasons why it isnt really a good idea. One being that the supercharger would cause all sorts of turbulence when the turbo is spooled, almost certianly hurting peak power production.

Two is it would limit optimum manifold design due to said turbulence.

Three, is there really a need for a supercharger to assist with throttle response for todays turbochargers? The answer is no, as a properly sized turbo will offer almost instantaneous throttle response and not choke on the top end.

Four, with our FWD cars, is a bit of lag really a bad thing? No.

Five, if maximum power production is your thing, the turbocharger is not the limiting factor in your setup. There isnt a need to run a supercharger AND a turbocharger to create this power. In fact, even if one could design this setup to make some ridiculous amount of power, its nothing the right size turbo couldnt also accomplish, probably better, on the same motor.

We can go on and on and on. As the guy above clarified, I would just like to see you guys start giving REASONS for why something is good or bad rather than just regurgitate when you read someone else on honda-tech 6 months ago say it was a bad idea. If you use your head and think about it for a bit, you can come up with many reasons as to why its a bad idea. Whether theyre right or wrong, at least state them so you have a discussion rather than a general blatant answer.

Most of these setups that are discussed involve the supercharger assisting in spooling a large turbo. As I said, the need for this really doesnt exist, either for spooltime or power production. On the top end, that roots charger bolted to that manifold would end up disrupting the flow of all that air that huge turbo is now sending into the manifold. There really is no benefit to such a setup.

 

nitrous+turbo=good

Supercharger+turbo=bad


Superchargers make boost based on rpm similar to a turbo. They are not "instant boost" like many think. By the time a supercharger starts making power a properly sized turbo would already be making boost. I think that was your point for adding a supercharger, it wouldnt work very well though.

 

theres a bmw somewhere that is twin charged. sounds pretty bad *** and has eye popping numbers. it pretty much sounds like a 757 taking off if u were on the run way as it went over your head

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FormulaGSR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nitrous+turbo=good

Supercharger+turbo=bad


Superchargers make boost based on rpm similar to a turbo. They are not "instant boost" like many think. By the time a supercharger starts making power a properly sized turbo would already be making boost. I think that was your point for adding a supercharger, it wouldnt work very well though.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Have you driven a roots supercharged honda and a turbocharged honda, or is this something youve read?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FormulaGSR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nitrous+turbo=good

Supercharger+turbo=bad


Superchargers make boost based on rpm similar to a turbo. They are not "instant boost" like many think. By the time a supercharger starts making power a properly sized turbo would already be making boost. I think that was your point for adding a supercharger, it wouldnt work very well though.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Ive driven a roots type supercharged crx si and it had full boost (10lbs) at 1800 rpms. My turboed teg is at full boost at 3000 (8lbs)

 

no ive driven roots supercharged chevys, and turboes hondas. None of my friends are dumb enough to supercharge thier hondas. The only supercharged hondas i've been around were beside me when lights dropped and behind me shortly there after. I wouldnt **** in a bucket for a supercharged honda. I rather go nitrous or turbo.