2k gets you these kinda pictures, let me know what you think, my skills need to improve.




My favorite




saturday night DJ party-taken with old camera





1st day with camera, let me know

 

Before you start flossin your "2k camera" you should work on your camera skills.
Some pictures look blurry...

Maybe it's just me.
Aside from all that, good stuff.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NightRider-gsR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Before you start flossin your "2k camera" you should work on your camera skills.
Some pictures look blurry...

Maybe it's just me.
Aside from all that, good stuff.</TD></TR></TABLE>


Thanks man, 1st time user, heh

 

my 200 dollar camera has better quality then that.. i dunno man pictures are blurry too small... read the manual.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NightRider-gsR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Before you start flossin your "2k camera" you should work on your camera skills.
Some pictures look blurry...

Maybe it's just me.
Aside from all that, good stuff.</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

Read the manual and practice practice practice.

 

i didnt know the d70 went for 2000 dollars

this is wat i think since you wanted us to let you know. please dont reply all defensively i'm just trying to offer constructive criticism

i'll only talk about the first pic.

using shutter priority was smart, but i dont know why you picked such a slow shutter speed (1/125), its a drag car, your pics came out blurry cuz your shutter speed was too slow. your camera picked an aperture of f/16 so im guessin you had plenty of light to work with. next time pick a shutter speed of at least 1/1000 the camera should pick a larger aperture (if not adjust your exposure compensation) your pictures should come out much much sharper.

you framed the shot kinda weird too. you cut off the roof near the top of the pic, and at the bottom you showed pavement, nothin special about pavement, try to get more of the car in your shots.

i think you can resize your pics larger. i always shoot at the largest picture setting, with the quality set to high. it makes a big picture, but i'd suggest resizing to maybe 500x700. your pics are really small the only reason i'd figure is because you have 56k and a lot of pics.

thats all i notice right off the bat. you seem to know what you want in a photograph, so just read the manual, understand what everythign does, and let it go from there

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sohcvtec66 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">2k gets you these kinda pictures, </TD></TR></TABLE>

2 grand you should have kept.

flossin'

Most 300 dollar camera would take better pictures than what you're working with...before you start acting like a baller make sure you can back it up. RTFM!

 

hahahahhahaha

 

aside from all the negative comments, are those snowmobiles racing?

 

An expensive camera doesnt make a great photo, the photographer does. Keep at it man.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Viorent GRIP! &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">An expensive camera doesnt make a great photo, the photographer does. Keep at it man. </TD></TR></TABLE>

an expensive camera can make a great photo! sorry for bein **** i just dont like gettin into that argument

i think a better way of saying it iss

theres a difference between what a camera can do and what a photographer can do

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mr poo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

an expensive camera can make a great photo! sorry for bein **** i just dont like gettin into that argument
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Agreed but if the photographer cannot use the camera properly the technology is "wasted".

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mr poo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
theres a difference between what a camera can do and what a photographer can do</TD></TR></TABLE>

Agreed

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mr poo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

an expensive camera can make a great photo! </TD></TR></TABLE>

Not necessarily, although it appears that the majority of the members here think that a expensive *** camera will magically improve their skills. I've seen photographers with Lomo cameras, pinhole cameras, even with disposable cameras create art, it's the photographer's eye and creativity that makes the difference. The Cameras and lenses are just tools to a photographer, like a brush is to a painter.

 

2k + no photo skills = shitty pics.
practice, practice ,learn, study,and practice some more!!

 

at best, the pics look average... and i see them in a different light when one tries to tout his/her "2k" camera...

as viorent grip! said
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
the cameras and lenses are just tools to a photographer, like a brush is to a painter</TD></TR></TABLE>

upgrade the skills first with the low end camera, then upgrade.