Type-r trans Vs. Gsr trans
Got one for you guys, On a all motor car would it be better to run the stock trans(GSR) or switch to type-r. I heard and i might be wrong, but the gsr trans is better.
Please i need input.
Please i need input.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WhiteGSR95 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">b16 si trans vs type r trans</TD></TR></TABLE>
the gear ratios are nearly indentical between these two. the type r has an lsd.
the gear ratios are nearly indentical between these two. the type r has an lsd.
Type-R tranny is a lot better; shorter gear ratio and an LSD. I have a gsr tranny now, and i hate it. Even shifting out of first gear and 9 grand, i will still fall out of vtec when going into second. It is a horrable, horrable feeling
Trending Topics
I have a GSR trans now too, and I hate 2nd gear! I pull hard in 1st, lag a lil going into 2nd but pull through in the upper rpms; but 3rd and 4th pul extremely hard!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ILIKEJDMX999 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think CTR has the shortest ratios, right?? shorter than ITR, why not go CTR trany?</TD></TR></TABLE>
its the same tranny as a 96-97 jdm itr
its the same tranny as a 96-97 jdm itr
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DC2Hybrid1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Type-R tranny is a lot better; shorter gear ratio and an LSD. I have a gsr tranny now, and i hate it. Even shifting out of first gear and 9 grand, i will still fall out of vtec when going into second. It is a horrable, horrable feeling
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Then something is serioulsy wrong. I remember when I owned a stock GSR and it never fell off the cam from the 1-2 shift. Even with the stock rev limiter.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Then something is serioulsy wrong. I remember when I owned a stock GSR and it never fell off the cam from the 1-2 shift. Even with the stock rev limiter.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hybrid93Eg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Then something is serioulsy wrong. I remember when I owned a stock GSR and it never fell off the cam from the 1-2 shift. Even with the stock rev limiter.</TD></TR></TABLE>
he probably doesnt recognize wheel spin, this happens to me sometimes, only cuz im spinning my front tires at the top of first.
Then something is serioulsy wrong. I remember when I owned a stock GSR and it never fell off the cam from the 1-2 shift. Even with the stock rev limiter.</TD></TR></TABLE>
he probably doesnt recognize wheel spin, this happens to me sometimes, only cuz im spinning my front tires at the top of first.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 4DooRGiSzer »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
he probably doesnt recognize wheel spin, this happens to me sometimes, only cuz im spinning my front tires at the top of first.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Is he sleeping while he drives or something?
he probably doesnt recognize wheel spin, this happens to me sometimes, only cuz im spinning my front tires at the top of first.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Is he sleeping while he drives or something?
92-93 GSR trans is even shorter than the USDM Type R(4.40 final drive)
http://www.autocrossing.com/cgi-bin/gearcalc.cgi
check out this webpage, you can compare USDM B16/ITR, 94-01 GSR, LS, and 92-93 GSR. So you can see the exact differences in gears. its a sweet web page!!
http://www.autocrossing.com/cgi-bin/gearcalc.cgi
check out this webpage, you can compare USDM B16/ITR, 94-01 GSR, LS, and 92-93 GSR. So you can see the exact differences in gears. its a sweet web page!!
i find the gsr tranny to be too tall for an 8k+ redline. the only way i'd be satisfied with it is by putting a 4.785 final drive in it.
d
Modified by daver at 10:18 AM 3/29/2005
d
Modified by daver at 10:18 AM 3/29/2005
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








