I was just wondering what kinda numbers people are laying down with their b16's.
My b16a1 layed down 159hp @ 8000rpm.

ebay special intake
dc 4-2-1 header
skunk2 im
my bad 161 was the other motor


Modified by Swapped_EG at 9:50 PM 2/27/2005

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Swapped_EG &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I was just wondering what kinda numbers people are laying down with their b16's.
My b16a1 layed down 161hp @ 8000rpm.

ebay special intake
dc 4-2-1 header
skunk2 im
</TD></TR></TABLE>

u got the chart?

 

I'd be interested in seeing the dyno sheet from that run.

 

so u made peak hp at readline? especially that much from bolt ons, i call bs

 

That sounds like an uncorrected hp number with the mods you listed, plus it's higher in the rpm range (8000 vs 7600-7800) than it should be. Lots of dyno's I've seen can read differently for a variety of reasons but that engine with those mods should make more like 141-145 hp at the wheels corrected. Have you done any 1/4 mile runs with your car? The trap speed can often help confirm a dyno's readings for power.

 

So you hit 8,000 RPM perfectly on that car on the dyno?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Swapped_EG &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I was just wondering what kinda numbers people are laying down with their b16's.
My b16a1 layed down 161hp @ 8000rpm.

ebay special intake
dc 4-2-1 header
skunk2 im</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thats seems slightly high, maybe 145whp

 

The B16A1 makes only 160hp, so how can this kid make 161WHP with those weak bolt ons? what was the TQ reading?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by acuracrombie82 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The B16A1 makes only 160hp, so how can this kid make 161WHP with those weak bolt ons? what was the TQ reading? </TD></TR></TABLE>

195kabillion... it has massive torque.... but in reality I would think like what maybe 112-120 lbs

 

I wish I had 112 tq. lol 109 tq here&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;

Maybe he's making 161 hp from different pistons? and forgot to metion it.
Would you believe me 162 whp here&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt; lol
But would like around 175-180 whp. I figure its do able but $$$

 

bs

 

Blow the whistle thars bullshit on that play.

I made 141.5hp with 100.3tq
I have i/h/e and cam gears. sorry buddy i cant see those numbers.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by civic-si-2000 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Blow the whistle thars bullshit on that play.

I made 141.5hp with 100.3tq
I have i/h/e and cam gears. sorry buddy i cant see those numbers. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i'm with this guy i made 157.66 110.38 with a 13.55 air/fuel i/h/e/and tuned with v-afc i dont see making any better than this without extensive tuning using hondata or something


http://www.we-todd-did-racing....D.jpg


Modified by modedicebox at 6:44 PM 2/26/2005


Modified by modedicebox at 6:44 PM 2/26/2005

 

I just made 162 with an intake, exhaust and itr cams w/ s2 cam gears and according to the guy who dynoed the car that is a wicked high number for a b16a2.
it seems impossible to make 161 w/out cams or some serious bolt ons. i would also be interested to see the graph.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by slowdx9585 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bs</TD></TR></TABLE>

read my signature...Also have a 2 1/4" exhaust and a chipped ecu

162 hp and 109 tq untuned

 

i know it seems like bs, thats why i wanted to get other numbers to see what was going on and no it wasn't at redline. Redline is 9000rpm i'll get the chart on here asap and the video

 

I was there and i have the vid on my computer but im playing gt4 so ill put up here later. Cant wait to see the reaction of all these honda heads who would rather call bs then try to rationalize.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NoDestinationSi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I just made 162 with an intake, exhaust and itr cams w/ s2 cam gears and according to the guy who dynoed the car that is a wicked high number for a b16a2.
it seems impossible to make 161 w/out cams or some serious bolt ons. i would also be interested to see the graph. </TD></TR></TABLE>

If u consider your typer cams a serious bolt on then u shouldnt be doing this thats not ****.

 

Stop posting and start uploading. TTIWWV.

 

what can i use to upload a video?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JIDUM_Undercover &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

If u consider your typer cams a serious bolt on then u shouldnt be doing this thats not ****.</TD></TR></TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JIDUM_Undercover &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what can i use to upload a video?
</TD></TR></TABLE>

I dont know, your the genius, you tell me.

 

Correction it was 153, still not bad for a stock b16.

 

So which is it? 153, 159, 160 or 161?

 

i turned 145.5 whp and 114.8 wtq, with a SIR2 b16, i have a graph to prove it.

chris

 

its what i just said it was on one of the two dynos hes ran.