D16Z6 owners. How many of you are pushing +140ft/lbs and with what mods?
Thread Starter
Trial User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 325
Likes: 1
From: CA, USA
D16Z6 owners. How many of you are pushing +140ft/lbs and with what mods?
Just wondering what you guys have done to get up there. For me personally I'm trying to attain it N/A if possible with mainly head work and bolt ons. I searched, but no luck. Thanks.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Re: D16Z6 owners. How many of you are pushing +140ft/lbs and with what mods? (Khmerbodian)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Khmerbodian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">...I'm trying to attain it N/A if possible with mainly head work and bolt ons. I searched, but no luck. Thanks.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Impossible
Impossible
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA, U.S.A.
Re: D16Z6 owners. How many of you are pushing +140ft/lbs and with what mods? (t0p_sh0tta)
I second that. a z6 with a JRSC puts out about 130 ft/lbs....so im think to get close to that NA, sleeves and 78-79mm pistons but i'm just guessing here. And torque relate to displacement if im not mistaken so without FI you're not gettin 140 without some serious work.
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: socal, CA, USA
Re: D16Z6 owners. How many of you are pushing +140ft/lbs and with what mods? (eXcelonTypeR)
120 ft/lbs. is possible NA, but that even requires plenty of work. If you want torque on a z6, FI is the only way to go. Torque and Honda don't really go together.
Solbros Owns Me
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,462
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Re: (Slammed92hbonN20)
I put down 108 ft lbs with only a ghetto port job and an untuned street cam on a tired 140k mile bottom end.
My new setup...STOCK head with PM6 pistons, feels MUCH torquier, I'm thinking maybe 112-116 ft lbs....I'm going to build a fresh bottom end, do a nice port job, run a Skunk 2 cam, and shoot for 120+ wtq....I'll do it...just wait. Ordered a LSD and flywheel today to finish my transaxle setup, then it's on to another engine build
My new setup...STOCK head with PM6 pistons, feels MUCH torquier, I'm thinking maybe 112-116 ft lbs....I'm going to build a fresh bottom end, do a nice port job, run a Skunk 2 cam, and shoot for 120+ wtq....I'll do it...just wait. Ordered a LSD and flywheel today to finish my transaxle setup, then it's on to another engine build
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,938
Likes: 1
From: Richmond, California
Re: (beerbongskickass)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by beerbongskickass »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I put down 208 ft/lbs... 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
what a liar
</TD></TR></TABLE>what a liar
be professional
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,842
Likes: 13
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: D16Z6 owners. How many of you are pushing +140ft/lbs and with what mods? (Khmerbodian)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Khmerbodian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm trying to attain it N/A if possible with mainly head work and bolt ons.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not possible, especially if you want to remain at 1.6L.
Supercharger or turbocharger is the only feasible way.
Not possible, especially if you want to remain at 1.6L.
Supercharger or turbocharger is the only feasible way.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: lauderhill, florida, USA
Re: D16Z6 owners. How many of you are pushing +140ft/lbs and with what mods? (Targa250R)
all motor i dont think u wil get thier, b20vtec's bareyl get that high and thats a 2.0 U should think about boost if u wanna make that much torque. Cause every 1 knows turbo d r torque monsters 
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mxmobbs
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Sep 21, 2017 09:37 AM
TiggsCRX
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
Jul 22, 2003 09:30 AM
xXx Justin xXx
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
10
May 14, 2003 06:44 PM
DaveF
Forced Induction
2
Apr 10, 2003 04:33 PM
