Post pics with digicams UNDER $200, 2.0mp or less only!!
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
From: King Tubbys studio, CA
Just looking back at the camera I used to have, a Canon S200 2.0. This is the camera I learned the basics on, and it was great. Allowed for manual adjustments, and white balancing, a great tool to learn from.
And since there's a $1,000 camera thread already, how about a low budget camera thread for those with the little point and shoot cams? Post away!
My old Canon S200 2.0.



I don't think I even knew Chad when I took this

Modified by rodrez. at 12:06 AM 3/22/2005
And since there's a $1,000 camera thread already, how about a low budget camera thread for those with the little point and shoot cams? Post away!
My old Canon S200 2.0.



I don't think I even knew Chad when I took this

Modified by rodrez. at 12:06 AM 3/22/2005
damn those are some pretty damn good pics with 2.0 mp or less...some look better than what my 5.1 can take
Trending Topics
very nice quality for some low budget digicam..i got a canon sd100 3.2mp..and my pics dont even come close to the pics posted above..and yeah i'm a noob when it comes to digicam..i just point and shoot..any advice would be greaty appreciated..
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by -Justin- »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">RoaringTurtle, those are awesome shots...especially love the mirror pic
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i love how those pics look better than most of the ppl postin up with 4-5mp cameras
</TD></TR></TABLE>i love how those pics look better than most of the ppl postin up with 4-5mp cameras
all shot with a finpix 2.0 mega pixel cam........know your roots....good post Rodrez. (im such the beginner.)







okay sorry got carried away......check out my sig for a bunch more low quality shitpics........lol
Modified by Madspeed at 5:51 PM 2/8/2005







okay sorry got carried away......check out my sig for a bunch more low quality shitpics........lol
Modified by Madspeed at 5:51 PM 2/8/2005
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RoaringTurtle »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">1.3 Megapixel Sony Power!!!

</TD></TR></TABLE>
lets everyone thats poor have hope to a good camera

</TD></TR></TABLE>
lets everyone thats poor have hope to a good camera
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hch0wn3r »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lets everyone thats poor have hope to a good camera
</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's all about composure, people.
</TD></TR></TABLE>It's all about composure, people.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
From: King Tubbys studio, CA
Roaring Turtle's car used to get whored out back in the day, but since then, it's been missing in action
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
From: King Tubbys studio, CA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by macrosshn »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">rodrez, was that todd kaneko's 240z?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm not sure, that was at the first D1 event in the parking lot at Irwindale. Chromed out engine bay.
I'm not sure, that was at the first D1 event in the parking lot at Irwindale. Chromed out engine bay.
Deals Gap, We Todd run. **** was fun. Ill post a few more of em.
1.6 Kodac if im not mistaken. Its a POS. Cannot adjust shutter or ap at all. I leanred alot from it
1.6 Kodac if im not mistaken. Its a POS. Cannot adjust shutter or ap at all. I leanred alot from it
damn, I don't have a $200 camera, or a $1,000 one
lol
I hope people take notice that most of the guys who have really expensive cameras now, still took the same kind of pics on their old equipment. You could hand the same camera to Rodrez and RT, and be able to tell who took what. If you have talent, your always going to take good shots, and your style will always be there.
lolI hope people take notice that most of the guys who have really expensive cameras now, still took the same kind of pics on their old equipment. You could hand the same camera to Rodrez and RT, and be able to tell who took what. If you have talent, your always going to take good shots, and your style will always be there.
How about make this a SUB $400 club so we don't have to make a thread titled Post pics with digicams over $200 but under $1000 only!!
I'll contribute with my A95 soon enough.
I'll contribute with my A95 soon enough.
Ive been doing some work for some local guys, and for my troubles, i am being given a 300d with my choice of lens under 350, and maybe even a new dell.
Work my *** off for them, and have taken 100s of pics and spent TONS of time in PS.
Work my *** off for them, and have taken 100s of pics and spent TONS of time in PS.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
From: King Tubbys studio, CA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by justin: »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">damn, I don't have a $200 camera, or a $1,000 one
lol
I hope people take notice that most of the guys who have really expensive cameras now, still took the same kind of pics on their old equipment. You could hand the same camera to Rodrez and RT, and be able to tell who took what. If you have talent, your always going to take good shots, and your style will always be there.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hazem »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How about make this a SUB $400 club so we don't have to make a thread titled Post pics with digicams over $200 but under $1000 only!!
I'll contribute with my A95 soon enough. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Really what this whole thread was about, Roaring Turtle and I were talking about posting pics on the internet, and alot of peoples misconceptions about megapixels. I wanted to show that even a low budget camera is fine for just posting on the internet. Now if I was printing those out, that's another story
.
lolI hope people take notice that most of the guys who have really expensive cameras now, still took the same kind of pics on their old equipment. You could hand the same camera to Rodrez and RT, and be able to tell who took what. If you have talent, your always going to take good shots, and your style will always be there.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hazem »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How about make this a SUB $400 club so we don't have to make a thread titled Post pics with digicams over $200 but under $1000 only!!
I'll contribute with my A95 soon enough. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Really what this whole thread was about, Roaring Turtle and I were talking about posting pics on the internet, and alot of peoples misconceptions about megapixels. I wanted to show that even a low budget camera is fine for just posting on the internet. Now if I was printing those out, that's another story
.











