My nice simple, "should be" reliable street turbo setup.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan, USA
I will save Honda-techs bandwidth and just post a link to my Forced Induction thread.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1128174
[***edit***]
Video!
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....DE%3D
[/edit]
But heres a preview of whats in there
'
Yes its cold, 17°F when these shots were taken.
For the Techies, this is fairly unique because of the use of a top-mount turbo manifold. Also, I was able to fit everything and have the ability to use the stock oil filter location, which, to my knowledge, is non-exitent with S2000 turbo manifolds.
Stock drivetrain, the rest of the setup is listed in the link.
Modified by Tinker219 at 8:03 PM 1/30/2005
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1128174
[***edit***]
Video!
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....DE%3D
[/edit]
But heres a preview of whats in there

'Yes its cold, 17°F when these shots were taken.
For the Techies, this is fairly unique because of the use of a top-mount turbo manifold. Also, I was able to fit everything and have the ability to use the stock oil filter location, which, to my knowledge, is non-exitent with S2000 turbo manifolds.
Stock drivetrain, the rest of the setup is listed in the link.
Modified by Tinker219 at 8:03 PM 1/30/2005
You might want to check with InlinePro before you say that you have the only Mani that does not need a oil filter relocation kit
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan, USA
For the oil filter comment, if you plan on running any kind of filter on the turbo, based on the pictures on their website, the oil filter cannot be saved. If someone proves me wrong, thats JUST FINE. "To my knowledge" were the terms used, not "its the ONLY ONE". Just had to clarify that! 
Numbers will happen on Friday. As stated in the other post, 280whp will be a large number for the boost setting(5.8psi) on the dyno that Im using. I will raise the boost as high as it can go while still running 92 octane fuel with NO knock. From my tuners experience, 300whp on their dyno is usually the pump gas limit with stock motors.

Numbers will happen on Friday. As stated in the other post, 280whp will be a large number for the boost setting(5.8psi) on the dyno that Im using. I will raise the boost as high as it can go while still running 92 octane fuel with NO knock. From my tuners experience, 300whp on their dyno is usually the pump gas limit with stock motors.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tinker219 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">For the oil filter comment, if you plan on running any kind of filter on the turbo, based on the pictures on their website, the oil filter cannot be saved. If someone proves me wrong, thats JUST FINE. "To my knowledge" were the terms used, not "its the ONLY ONE". Just had to clarify that! 
Numbers will happen on Friday. As stated in the other post, 280whp will be a large number for the boost setting(5.8psi) on the dyno that Im using. I will raise the boost as high as it can go while still running 92 octane fuel with NO knock. From my tuners experience, 300whp on their dyno is usually the pump gas limit with stock motors.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you're using a mustang dyno?

Numbers will happen on Friday. As stated in the other post, 280whp will be a large number for the boost setting(5.8psi) on the dyno that Im using. I will raise the boost as high as it can go while still running 92 octane fuel with NO knock. From my tuners experience, 300whp on their dyno is usually the pump gas limit with stock motors.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you're using a mustang dyno?
Mabye this will helphttp://inlinepro.com/gallery/gallery2.html# Look at the bottom of the pics. The last 3 are of my car. My oil filter is there and I also have a air filter. The only thing with the is you really cant run much bigger the a GT35-61
I hate seeing all this turbo S stuff. I told myself that I won't turbo another car ! I have to stick to that.
Nice pics by the way
Nice pics by the way
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tmkpres »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I hate seeing all this turbo S stuff. I told myself that I won't turbo another car ! I have to stick to that.
Nice pics by the way
</TD></TR></TABLE>
exactly what i said. one thing that keeps me away is my roading racing. takes away most of my $$
Nice pics by the way
</TD></TR></TABLE>exactly what i said. one thing that keeps me away is my roading racing. takes away most of my $$
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 03s2kblue »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">muwahahahha. you two will fall to the power of the snail.. hehehehe.. </TD></TR></TABLE>
told you, anytime but i pick the place
told you, anytime but i pick the place
Trust me I know the power of the snail.
As a matter of fact we are putting together my friends GSR that is running my old civic set up which should make 450 to the front wheels on 91, we made 360 on 91 but the turbo died out so we went bigger !
As a matter of fact we are putting together my friends GSR that is running my old civic set up which should make 450 to the front wheels on 91, we made 360 on 91 but the turbo died out so we went bigger !
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan, USA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 03s2kblue »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
you're using a mustang dyno?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep! I love the tunes from them. Id LOVE to run a 350whp dyno-jet tuned supercharged S2000 if I put down 300whp on this Mustang dyno. The results would be very interesting
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blkturbos2k »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Mabye this will helphttp://inlinepro.com/gallery/gallery2.html# Look at the bottom of the pics. The last 3 are of my car. My oil filter is there and I also have a air filter. The only thing with the is you really cant run much bigger the a GT35-61</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ah...yes, turbo size limits things on the InlinePro. With the way my manifold is setup, Ive fit 4 bolt, 5 bolt, T4 Vband, and GT series turbos, all with S housings, all with lots of room to spare.
I DID have to relocate the battery(maybe not with a Hawker or something VERY small) with my manifold though, so in either case, ya gotta move something.
you're using a mustang dyno?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep! I love the tunes from them. Id LOVE to run a 350whp dyno-jet tuned supercharged S2000 if I put down 300whp on this Mustang dyno. The results would be very interesting

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blkturbos2k »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Mabye this will helphttp://inlinepro.com/gallery/gallery2.html# Look at the bottom of the pics. The last 3 are of my car. My oil filter is there and I also have a air filter. The only thing with the is you really cant run much bigger the a GT35-61</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ah...yes, turbo size limits things on the InlinePro. With the way my manifold is setup, Ive fit 4 bolt, 5 bolt, T4 Vband, and GT series turbos, all with S housings, all with lots of room to spare.
I DID have to relocate the battery(maybe not with a Hawker or something VERY small) with my manifold though, so in either case, ya gotta move something.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tinker219 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yep! I love the tunes from them. Id LOVE to run a 350whp dyno-jet tuned supercharged S2000 if I put down 300whp on this Mustang dyno. The results would be very interesting
Ah...yes, turbo size limits things on the InlinePro. With the way my manifold is setup, Ive fit 4 bolt, 5 bolt, T4 Vband, and GT series turbos, all with S housings, all with lots of room to spare.
I DID have to relocate the battery(maybe not with a Hawker or something VERY small) with my manifold though, so in either case, ya gotta move something.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
know any idea of the ratio differnce in between the mustang dyno and the dyno-jet? cause i know the mustang dyno gives off way lower numbers then the dyno-jet does.....
Yep! I love the tunes from them. Id LOVE to run a 350whp dyno-jet tuned supercharged S2000 if I put down 300whp on this Mustang dyno. The results would be very interesting

Ah...yes, turbo size limits things on the InlinePro. With the way my manifold is setup, Ive fit 4 bolt, 5 bolt, T4 Vband, and GT series turbos, all with S housings, all with lots of room to spare.
I DID have to relocate the battery(maybe not with a Hawker or something VERY small) with my manifold though, so in either case, ya gotta move something.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
know any idea of the ratio differnce in between the mustang dyno and the dyno-jet? cause i know the mustang dyno gives off way lower numbers then the dyno-jet does.....
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan, USA
its around 15% lower, which is why I quoted lower numbers than "normal". Sometime this summer Im going to tune on a Mustang, then drive over to a Dynojet and calculate the differences. Thatd be the only true way of knowing
Others have done this and the average is 10-15% lower.
Others have done this and the average is 10-15% lower.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tinker219 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">its around 15% lower, which is why I quoted lower numbers than "normal". Sometime this summer Im going to tune on a Mustang, then drive over to a Dynojet and calculate the differences. Thatd be the only true way of knowing
Others have done this and the average is 10-15% lower.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah i knew why you quoted the low numbers thats why i asked to make sure..
just trying to do my own calculations to see how much it would push on a dyno-jet..
Others have done this and the average is 10-15% lower.</TD></TR></TABLE>yeah i knew why you quoted the low numbers thats why i asked to make sure..
just trying to do my own calculations to see how much it would push on a dyno-jet..
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan, USA
me too! Unfortunately theres the thing of running a business, it was tough enough to be able to get out of the shop tomorrow 
Tomorrow evening/night, Videos and numbers will be up!!!

Tomorrow evening/night, Videos and numbers will be up!!!
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan, USA
Thats as close as I have. Pictures will be taken after the dyno, as once everything is proved successful, I will then jig everything, which means removing...again. I should be able to get this kit on and off in about 20 min flat by the time Im ready to leave this thing alone
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,273
Likes: 1
From: Traverse City, Michigan, USA
Made it through the dyno A-OK! Ended up with about a mixture of 91 octane fuel during the tuning. I figure if she will run safe on 91, itll be even safer on 93.
On a Mustang dyno at 8PSI, she put down 312whp(8250rpm, dead level after that). And 202wtq(8krpm). 11.5:1 A/F ratio, around 16 degrees timing(VERY conservative). Ill be driving the car all week to report reliability issues, drove it 40 miles tonight with no problems except lack of traction
(power, dry/salty roads).
The torque hits about 200ft/lbs at 3500 Rpm, and steadily rises till it peaks at 201.9wtq@8000RPM.
Boost appears to be hitting 8psi between 3500-3900, I have to review the Log data to pinpoint an exact cell.
The car is SOOOO torquey putting around town that its unbelieveable. Obviously lay into it in 1st or 2nd gear, and you better be ready for a loose ***-end.
I played with a stock-ish SRT4 at a light on my way to my GFs house...LOL. Ya nuff said there.
Graphs/Videos will be up more than likely tomorrow night!!!!!!
On a Mustang dyno at 8PSI, she put down 312whp(8250rpm, dead level after that). And 202wtq(8krpm). 11.5:1 A/F ratio, around 16 degrees timing(VERY conservative). Ill be driving the car all week to report reliability issues, drove it 40 miles tonight with no problems except lack of traction
(power, dry/salty roads).The torque hits about 200ft/lbs at 3500 Rpm, and steadily rises till it peaks at 201.9wtq@8000RPM.
Boost appears to be hitting 8psi between 3500-3900, I have to review the Log data to pinpoint an exact cell.
The car is SOOOO torquey putting around town that its unbelieveable. Obviously lay into it in 1st or 2nd gear, and you better be ready for a loose ***-end.
I played with a stock-ish SRT4 at a light on my way to my GFs house...LOL. Ya nuff said there.
Graphs/Videos will be up more than likely tomorrow night!!!!!!
very nice numbers for a mustang dyno.. hehehe.... (calculating what it would/could be on a dyno-jet) hehehe 
can't wait to see the video and the dyno sheet...

can't wait to see the video and the dyno sheet...


