Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

'00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 12:42 PM
  #1  
CheezeFrog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable

Yesterday was a bad day for me. I got a ticket for 65 in a 50. I got a papercut while looking at Ant Farms at Toys R Us. And I got beat by a friend of mine in his new BMW M3 'vert. Well no ****, Sherlock, right? Read on, because the outcome isn't as bad as you and I might have thought.

I saw Joseph pulling out of Best Buy in his silver M3, so I let him pull in front of me. We turned onto the feeder (these loooong stretches of road that run parallel to the freeways here in TX) and hit a red light. He's in front of me, and I know he's going to punch it when the light turns green, becaues he got on it every chance he got since he left Best Buy. At least thats what it seemed like compared to my no-torquemobile. Anyway he hits it off the line and instantly pulls about 3 lengths on me -- one of those lengths is because that's the way we started, with him in front. We stayed that way with him maybe pulling ever so slightly on me up til the top of 3rd gear where I shut down because I had to merge onto the freeway. I couldn't believe he didn't pull that hard on me. In fact, the last LS1 F-Body I raced pulled harder than that M3 did. But it could be that the extra weight of being a convertable brought the M3's performance to sub LS1 levels, as far as straight line speed goes.

Granted, when you're in the same lane as the person you're racing, it's hard to tell exactly how bad you're losing (or winning) compared to a side-by-side race. But in all honesty I have over 200 miles of dragstrip seat time and I know how hard a car pulls from me that is 5mph, 10mph, or even 20mph faster in trap speeds. This M3 looked like it was maybe 5mph faster, if that -- and if you've been to the dragstrip, visually that's not a whole lot of difference.

gg BMW

The only non-Honda part I have is an AEM intake.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 12:47 PM
  #2  
IntegraT's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo, AZ, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (CheezeFrog)

hhmmmmm...
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 12:50 PM
  #3  
Jason's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (CheezeFrog)

my buddy has a 01 coupe...kills my car...I've driven it...without a doubt....maybe he just doesn't know how to drive...
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 01:04 PM
  #4  
Dropspeed's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
From: Suburbs of Detroit, MI
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (MR.Chudan)

I have run into 2 new m3s on the street. The first conv I raced I destroyed.........The coupe, I got my *** handed to me from the line. It ussually comes down to the driver. FYI my ITR runs consistant mid 13s as it sits. Also if your friend left his traction control on that would have significantly hampered his performance.

mattj





[Modified by Dropspeed, 2:05 PM 1/8/2002]
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
Flux's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,108
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (Dropspeed)

You were at Toys R Us looking at ant farms?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 01:13 PM
  #6  
CheezeFrog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (Flux)

You were at Toys R Us looking at ant farms?
Short story... Not very interesting
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 01:13 PM
  #7  
Jason's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (Flux)

You were at Toys R Us looking at ant farms?
I was wondering about that statement too...
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 01:14 PM
  #8  
B2FiNiTY's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 38,367
Likes: 1
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (CheezeFrog)

. I got a papercut while looking at Ant Farms at Toys R.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 01:17 PM
  #9  
PMTypeR's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, MN, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (B2FiNiTY)

too funny
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 01:29 PM
  #10  
junglistgsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
From: NoVA, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (PMTypeR)

a attribute it to: left his traction control or cant drive....those are low 13 second cars....
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 01:33 PM
  #11  
Dropspeed's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
From: Suburbs of Detroit, MI
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (junglistgsr)

a attribute it to: left his traction control or cant drive....those are low 13 second cars....
And high 12 second cars.....
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 02:01 PM
  #12  
Looose_R's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: not, tiiight
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (CheezeFrog)

i drive both cars on a weekly basis and its no contest. might as well brag about almost beating granny in her testarossa.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 02:18 PM
  #13  
CheezeFrog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (b20bastard)

Sorry, I was just telling the story like it happened. If you think a 105mph car is going to beat a 100mph car by 20 car lengths in the 1/4 (or in the first three gears for that matter), you're living in a fantasy world. And if I'm bragging about losing to an M3, you're bragging about driving one on a weekly basis
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 02:32 PM
  #14  
H-PIMP's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,567
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (CheezeFrog)

The reason it "seemed" slower than an LS1 F-body is because IT IS slower than one. Ram-Air LS1's w/6 spd trans. Runs 12.7 @ 105 with a man (not a boy) behind the wheel. As nice and fast as the new M3's are. A $28,000 Ram Air Trans Am will run circles around it. And you can take my word on this one. I work at a Pontiac dealership and drive LS1's on a daily basis.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 02:56 PM
  #15  
Ch33se's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (CheezeFrog)

hell yeah!!!!!!!!!!!! i like ant farms too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 03:32 PM
  #16  
ActiveAero's Avatar
Paragraph Alert
25 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 2
From: Oil rig, middle of the ocean
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (H-PIMP)

The reason it "seemed" slower than an LS1 F-body is because IT IS slower than one. Ram-Air LS1's w/6 spd trans. Runs 12.7 @ 105 with a man (not a boy) behind the wheel. As nice and fast as the new M3's are. A $28,000 Ram Air Trans Am will run circles around it. And you can take my word on this one. I work at a Pontiac dealership and drive LS1's on a daily basis.
Uh, yeah...sure they don't. This "man" must have had slicks on his LS1. I've ran LS1's as well as a new M3 convertible and the M3 was definitley faster than any of the stock LS1's. Saying an LS1 will run circles around a new M3 deserves a couple of in my opinion.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 03:42 PM
  #17  
Jason's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (the real steve c)

I saw my buddy run a 13.1 on a stock WS6, in the middle of summer in south florida....

sorry, but I think the F body wins this one...stock for stock
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 03:46 PM
  #18  
H-PIMP's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,567
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (the real steve c)

I'll only acknowledge Steve C's reply. Because Activeaero, you're fresh out of troll status, and, your previous posts speak for themselves. Like running an open cat on your ITR and your "mad skillz" interior removal. I drove an '02 Firehawk (345 hp) on Friday that came in off the truck. I had to wash it and fill it up for the owner who had patiently been waiting for it to arrive. And I can assure you that no stock M3 (E36 or E46 for that matter) could even hold a candle to this $31,000 Trans Am in a straight line. No way! I've driven an '02 M3 and although leaps and bounds faster than it's predecessor. It's not F-body fast in a straight line. Deal with it.

And, although base ram air cars only have 325 hp, the extra $2500 for the "Firehawk" upfitter package (Bilstein shocks, SLP exhaust, serialized plaque, etc.) is money well spent. I'm madly in love with the new M3, and lust to own one in the next year or two if my finances allow it. But a Ram Air T/A and a nice downpayment on a house sounds better to my wife.


[Modified by H-PIMP, 12:50 AM 1/9/2002]
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 03:47 PM
  #19  
Jason's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (the real steve c)

as stock as the showroom floor gets...he still hasn't done ANYTHING to it...he's saving for a house so he doesn't spend any cash on it...
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 04:00 PM
  #20  
H-PIMP's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,567
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (the real steve c)

What's funny is how well they handle as well. The common ricer argument is that the import will win "in the twisties." I guess many of these kids in Civics with chopped springs and stock shocks have never driven a camaro....fun car.
Agreed. LS1 F-body's deliver supercar performance at sport compact prices. I'm even considering jumping into an F-body. Since I get the nice GM discount for being an employee. Which means that I can drive a WS6 off the lot for the price of a WRX. And have speed and handling that rivals the E46 M3 at a fraction of the cost. If you get a T/A with the right options it will handle like its on rails.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 04:22 PM
  #21  
nfn15037's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,611
Likes: 3
From: Boston, MA, USA
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (H-PIMP)

The WS6 might kill the M3 at the strip, but race around a roadcourse. By bye Trans-Am. ALso, about the ITR vs M3 issue, did you ever consider the fact that you were driving in his draft, im sure that helped you ALOT. Try racing him side by side and tell us how it goes. Not trying to flame or anything, just offering my opinion.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 04:30 PM
  #22  
H-PIMP's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,567
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (nfn15037)

The WS6 might kill the M3 at the strip, but race around a roadcourse. By bye Trans-Am. ALso, about the ITR vs M3 issue, did you ever consider the fact that you were driving in his draft, im sure that helped you ALOT. Try racing him side by side and tell us how it goes. Not trying to flame or anything, just offering my opinion.
All good points. Lets not forget that, although the M3 will have an edge in stopping power (but not much if the F-body is 1LE equipped) the corner exit speed of the F-body will even things out a little. It really boils down to the driver, since both cars are very capable machines. A $49,000 Z06 on the other hand, will mop the floor with both cars (M3 & F-body) with the a/c on. While leaving an extra $20k in the Vette owners pocket.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 04:33 PM
  #23  
Bob#455's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 0
From: Land of Oz, KS
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (H-PIMP)

A $49,000 Z06 on the other hand, will mop the floor with both cars (M3 & F-body) with the a/c on. While leaving an extra $20k in the Vette owners pocket.
Okay, I'll agree that the Z06 will tear apart the M3 or F-body on a road course. But please explain where the Vette owner will get the extra $20k from...?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 04:35 PM
  #24  
H-PIMP's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,567
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (Bob#497)

M3's are going for WAY over sticker in this part of the country (high 60's), as where a Z06 can be picked up for $1500 under list. So when it's all said and done the Z06 is $15 to $20k cheaper than a new M3.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2002 | 04:39 PM
  #25  
Bob#455's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 0
From: Land of Oz, KS
Default Re: '00 ITR vs. '02 M3 Convertable (H-PIMP)

Oh okay, I didn't know there was a shortage of M3s in NYC. If I were going to buy an M3 (or any other car), I would never pay MORE than sticker... That makes the car much less appealing, especially when the competition is so tight.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 PM.