Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

AEM V2 Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 09:52 PM
  #1  
v t e c 2 3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA, USA
Default AEM V2 Intake

i was wondering how people like the V2 intake on their ITR's.. any feedback will be greatly appreciated..
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 10:18 PM
  #2  
tw_itr01's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC, 29485
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (v t e c 2 3)

umm last time I looked there is not an application for our car. Check out AEM's website and you will see.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #3  
CWTegRNo.160's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
From: Chi town burbs, IL, United States
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (tw_itr01)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tw_itr01 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">umm last time I looked there is not an application for our car. Check out AEM's website and you will see.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thats what i Thought
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #4  
v t e c 2 3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA, USA
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (CWTegRNo.160)

won't the gs/rs/ls model fit on the itr??? anyone know??
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #5  
tw_itr01's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC, 29485
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (v t e c 2 3)

no
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 10:32 PM
  #6  
p nut's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,268
Likes: 0
From: Rockies, USA
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (v t e c 2 3)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by v t e c 2 3 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">won't the gs/rs/ls model fit on the itr??? anyone know??</TD></TR></TABLE>

Not sure about the V2, but the AEM CAI will fit (LS --&gt; ITR) If the original AEM fits, then I don't see why a V2 wouldn't.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #7  
v t e c 2 3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA, USA
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (P Nut)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by P Nut &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Not sure about the V2, but the AEM CAI will fit (LS --&gt; ITR) If the original AEM fits, then I don't see why a V2 wouldn't.</TD></TR></TABLE>

that's what i figured.... anyone know for sure????
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #8  
130R's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,160
Likes: 0
From: 31 Spooner street
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (v t e c 2 3)

ones for a gsr wont fit because of the difference in the intake manifold designs. try the one for the ls out, maybe it will fit....

but someone i know has it. works pretty good from his opinion. but he's got a built b16 so yeah
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 11:37 PM
  #9  
Gooner's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Belfast, U.K.
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (carbing'ed)

Go for the GruppeM carbon fibre system it is widely considered to be the best cos it provides true cold air induction via a ram-air scoop at the scuttle panel and a highly efficient K&N cone filter while the carbon fibre construction resists heat soak very well, with an independent source claiming that with the aid of a remote thermal probe the temp. of the air entering the actual filter is only one degree above ambient!
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 11:38 PM
  #10  
v t e c 2 3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA, USA
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (Gooner)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Gooner &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Go for the GruppeM carbon fibre system it is widely considered to be the best cos it provides true cold air induction via a ram-air scoop at the scuttle panel and a highly efficient K&N cone filter while the carbon fibre construction resists heat soak very well, with an independent source claiming that with the aid of a remote thermal probe the temp. of the air entering the actual filter is only one degree above ambient! </TD></TR></TABLE>

ne pix of that intake??? has ne one tried to fit the gs/ls/rs v2 intake onto their itr???
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 12:53 AM
  #11  
130R's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,160
Likes: 0
From: 31 Spooner street
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (Gooner)

gruppeM? do we even get that product here in the states?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 04:50 AM
  #12  
pyromaster's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
From: decatuR, GA
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (carbing'ed)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by carbing’ed &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">gruppeM? do we even get that product here in the states?</TD></TR></TABLE>
if you get lucky like I did you can
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #13  
Gooner's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Belfast, U.K.
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (pyromaster)

well there is a GruppeM USA website cos I checked first but although the home page came up I had trouble accessing the site. Honestly the product is sheer quality and most importantly it works very well, and bein an aircraft engineer I can tell you that the CF is of aircraft quality and so it also looks the business and is well worth taking the trouble to source cos let's face it most induction kits are **** all you usually get for your hard earned is admittedly a nice throaty rip but at the cost of power!
I see that Pyro has one fitted to his ITR but I don't see the ram-air scoop that I have on my DC5 so i don't know whether or not the DC2 unit is different!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 07:33 AM
  #14  
Dave_B's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 1
From: blavica
Default

I don't think they make the V2 for the ITR but I did have it on my GS-R. I had to wait 2 months for it cause as soon as it was published that they were out I ordered one. On the GS-R it was damn good. They only problem I had was it would rub on one of the AC line nuts and caused some damage to the outside of the intake. Other than that I was very happy with it.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #15  
Mugen Civic Type R's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Default Re: (01PY0559)

I was told by a AEM guy that the V2 CAI doesnt work well with the B18c5. It has something to do with the air flow characteristics of the ITR intake manifold / flow turbulance etc. So i was told.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 08:47 AM
  #16  
tegUNO's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (v t e c 2 3)

AEM V2 is overpriced, and it isn't any better than the regular aem CAI.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 08:54 AM
  #17  
Bbasso's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,261
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (tegUNO)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tegUNO &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">AEM V2 is overpriced, and it isn't any better than the regular aem CAI.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Got hard proof to back that up?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 09:42 AM
  #18  
rino924's Avatar
White Trash Wish Cash
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (v t e c 2 3)

There was a 95 civic ex at my aunts shop with a B18C5 swap and it had a V2 intake. So i dont know, maybe gsr would fit.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 10:19 AM
  #19  
el arbi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,103
Likes: 0
From: in the club
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (rino924)

Some people say the V2 is bullshit, others say it isn't.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 10:49 AM
  #20  
ITR184's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Bitburg, Germany
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (99SiRacer)

I thought about getting rid of my AEM, and getting a J's air intake. If I was sure about stayin N/A I would get one.





Modified by Cod Sac at 8:31 PM 12/29/2004
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 10:59 AM
  #21  
el arbi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,103
Likes: 0
From: in the club
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (Cod Sac)

That looks like an insane piece !
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #22  
B2FiNiTY's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 38,367
Likes: 1
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (Cod Sac)

That's for the s2000. Way different for the ITR.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #23  
ITR184's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Bitburg, Germany
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (B2FiNiTY)

modified above pic. Thanks




Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 12:01 PM
  #24  
tegUNO's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Default Re: AEM V2 Intake (Bbasso)

Well my friend who has an RSX S gained 1mph and decresed .2 of his 1/4 mile time from changing the V2 to the regular CAI. The 1/4 mile times where constant and on the same day, also it was the only mod.


BTW I have seen plenty people complaining about this on the net ...pz
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 12:11 PM
  #25  
OUTKAST_R's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

i had the aem cold air on my ITR and i liked it alot, they dont have the V2 just the reg cold air intake. I think that for the $$ the AEM is the best ? and for the people in cali, its CARB approved.

The only reason that i took it off is because i went turbo
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:55 AM.