b18c5 ?
i have an 89 crx si. im putting a b18c5 ,a procharger kit, venom VCN 2000, and exhuast of course what do u think my time will be with slicks? ps the procharger is a 70 to 80% hp increase
you'll prolly get 60-70% increase if your lucky. and i hope your lowering the compression on the c5 and you'll need more then viper vcn 2k and exhaust for it to run right.
or this Q could be bullshit.
or this Q could be bullshit.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NONVTECSI »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">To many factors...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Procharger sucks..Its to laggy..
The only supercharger I would put on a honda motor in Jackson racing supercharger
Procharger sucks..Its to laggy..
The only supercharger I would put on a honda motor in Jackson racing supercharger
I have some act and aem stickers. If properly installed each sticker you add will shave 1 sec off your 1320 time.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1072460
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1072460
^^ supercharging is boost, tool
- Both supercharger and turbocharger uses otherwise wasted energy to force air into the engine. The difference is they get the power from different places to either suck in or accelerate air. They're both boosting. And although turbocharging is more effective on these smaller engines, superchargers aren't stupid.
B18C5 turbo setups in these light cars can easily get to 12 flat. Generally no one even bothers going the supercharged route because the expense doesn't equal it's output compared to turbo.
I would go with Jackson Racing if anything. But if you're going to spend the money, build a turbo setup, You'll be much happier.
I've seen Jackson's on a b16 and it makes the 0-4000RPM range feel like nothing's on it. Although you'll get thrown into the back of the car after 5000RPM... it's still not as good as a smaller turbo that'll pick up at 2500 or so.
Modified by eumoria at 12:41 AM 12/19/2004
- Both supercharger and turbocharger uses otherwise wasted energy to force air into the engine. The difference is they get the power from different places to either suck in or accelerate air. They're both boosting. And although turbocharging is more effective on these smaller engines, superchargers aren't stupid.
B18C5 turbo setups in these light cars can easily get to 12 flat. Generally no one even bothers going the supercharged route because the expense doesn't equal it's output compared to turbo.
I would go with Jackson Racing if anything. But if you're going to spend the money, build a turbo setup, You'll be much happier.
I've seen Jackson's on a b16 and it makes the 0-4000RPM range feel like nothing's on it. Although you'll get thrown into the back of the car after 5000RPM... it's still not as good as a smaller turbo that'll pick up at 2500 or so.Modified by eumoria at 12:41 AM 12/19/2004
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PuroMotor
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
7
Jan 9, 2008 07:32 PM
egCoupe
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
22
Jul 23, 2005 06:09 AM
clb444
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
11
Mar 2, 2005 02:56 PM




