dynoed the R again today
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: Fort Mill, SC
dynoed the R again today
well i dynoed the R again today..... (dynojet)
last time it was ...
157whp and 112lbs torque (a/f was high 11's and mids 10's topend)
today it did... i leaned it out from 45psi to around 40 psi ,new mods adjustable f/p reg, act cutch, act flywheel)
168whp and 116lbs torque (a/f was about mid 13's and went down to high 11's topend)
what you guys think, do thses dyno numbers seem right??
last time it was ...
157whp and 112lbs torque (a/f was high 11's and mids 10's topend)
today it did... i leaned it out from 45psi to around 40 psi ,new mods adjustable f/p reg, act cutch, act flywheel)
168whp and 116lbs torque (a/f was about mid 13's and went down to high 11's topend)
what you guys think, do thses dyno numbers seem right??
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 3
From: Chicagoland, IL
Re: dynoed the R again today (fastvtecCL)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fastvtecCL »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well i dynoed the R again today..... (dynojet)
last time it was ...
157whp and 112lbs torque (a/f was high 11's and mids 10's topend)
today it did... i leaned it out from 45psi to around 40 psi ,new mods adjustable f/p reg, act cutch, act flywheel)
168whp and 116lbs torque (a/f was about mid 13's and went down to high 11's topend)
what you guys think, do thses dyno numbers seem right??</TD></TR></TABLE>
That sounds reasonable, if you haven't tuned the cam gears yet.. have you? What gains did you get from that? What ECU are you running?
last time it was ...
157whp and 112lbs torque (a/f was high 11's and mids 10's topend)
today it did... i leaned it out from 45psi to around 40 psi ,new mods adjustable f/p reg, act cutch, act flywheel)
168whp and 116lbs torque (a/f was about mid 13's and went down to high 11's topend)
what you guys think, do thses dyno numbers seem right??</TD></TR></TABLE>
That sounds reasonable, if you haven't tuned the cam gears yet.. have you? What gains did you get from that? What ECU are you running?
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
I still think thats way to rich on the top end. I was running a lot leaner than that with higher compression and big cams.
i think there is still room for improvement.
what are you using to tune the fuel? Are you just changing the fuel pressure??? I would leave the fuel pressure near or close to stock and get something to tune the fuel like a VAFC or something if you havnt done so already.
i think there is still room for improvement.
what are you using to tune the fuel? Are you just changing the fuel pressure??? I would leave the fuel pressure near or close to stock and get something to tune the fuel like a VAFC or something if you havnt done so already.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: Fort Mill, SC
Re: dynoed the R again today (ccfries)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ccfries »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
That sounds reasonable, if you haven't tuned the cam gears yet.. have you? What gains did you get from that? What ECU are you running?</TD></TR></TABLE>
i still have the stock ecu for right now.. the cam gears are still set at 0
That sounds reasonable, if you haven't tuned the cam gears yet.. have you? What gains did you get from that? What ECU are you running?</TD></TR></TABLE>
i still have the stock ecu for right now.. the cam gears are still set at 0
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: Fort Mill, SC
Re: (RTW DC2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RTW DC2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I still think thats way to rich on the top end. I was running a lot leaner than that with higher compression and big cams.
i think there is still room for improvement.
what are you using to tune the fuel? Are you just changing the fuel pressure??? I would leave the fuel pressure near or close to stock and get something to tune the fuel like a VAFC or something if you havnt done so already. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i know there is still alot of room for improvement.. i think before it's all said and done i could get about 175whp or so.. all i had to tune with today was the fuel pressure reg, i have a vafc but it's not installed yet.. i was planing on the a/f curve it be about 13.5-14.0 all the way across the board and i would be happy...
i think there is still room for improvement.
what are you using to tune the fuel? Are you just changing the fuel pressure??? I would leave the fuel pressure near or close to stock and get something to tune the fuel like a VAFC or something if you havnt done so already. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i know there is still alot of room for improvement.. i think before it's all said and done i could get about 175whp or so.. all i had to tune with today was the fuel pressure reg, i have a vafc but it's not installed yet.. i was planing on the a/f curve it be about 13.5-14.0 all the way across the board and i would be happy...
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
why are you even bothering tuning it with just a FPR? you arent gonna be able to tune it worth a crap that way and its really just a waste of time (and money assuming you are paying for the dyno time).
another note is what Rob said...who is tuning this car? sounds like you need someone else tuning this thing (P1 Auto
) because it sounds like they are just enjoying taking your money.
another note is what Rob said...who is tuning this car? sounds like you need someone else tuning this thing (P1 Auto
) because it sounds like they are just enjoying taking your money.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,261
Likes: 0
From: USA
Re: (Ronin EG6)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ronin EG6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what whp does a stock ITR put down?</TD></TR></TABLE>
mine put down 164/116
mine put down 164/116
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,027
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Re: (Ronin EG6)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ronin EG6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what whp does a stock ITR put down?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Depends on the dyno, all dyno's read differently.
Where did you get it dyno'd? Do they have a stock ITR that they have dyno'd on their dyno? That would be the best comparison. You can always head over to P1 since Jack has MANY different ITR plots on his dyno.
Depends on the dyno, all dyno's read differently.
Where did you get it dyno'd? Do they have a stock ITR that they have dyno'd on their dyno? That would be the best comparison. You can always head over to P1 since Jack has MANY different ITR plots on his dyno.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 3
From: Chicagoland, IL
Re: dynoed the R again today (fastvtecCL)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fastvtecCL »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i still have the stock ecu for right now..
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Then why do you have an OBDB2 (sic) to OBD1 conversion harness?
i still have the stock ecu for right now..
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Then why do you have an OBDB2 (sic) to OBD1 conversion harness?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IntegraTionR
Acura Integra Type-R
16
Nov 20, 2007 04:07 PM