Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Any one with a eg hatch that had a z6 with I/H/E only Whats your Best times?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #1  
cranberry's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,475
Likes: 0
From: Working in the NRBG, Garage
Default Any one with a eg hatch that had a z6 with I/H/E only Whats your Best times?

Im tring to figure out whats about that best i can get out of my stock car before i boost. im not the best driver, but good enough. I've been told many of things like 16.7, 16.3, 16.9, and a 15.7 at the best. My friend who ran his stock dx motor ran a 17.12 something like that and thinks my car wont do much better. just post up your best times and tell me what you think.
My car 93 civic si.
no carpet, kinda of has all the interior. no ps, no a/c, and nothing in the hacth area.
Motor D16z6 with a aem short ram intake and if you include a gsr muffler as a mod then well yeah. its all stock motor wise. I have tokico shocks and nuespeed racing springs. proxies 195/55. let me know what you guys think.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #2  
skunk2eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: tampa, fl
Default Re: Any one with a eg hatch that had a z6 with I/H/E only Whats your Best times? (cranberry)

take it to the track and find out.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:13 PM
  #3  
cranberry's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,475
Likes: 0
From: Working in the NRBG, Garage
Default

wouldnt you think im planning on it? well i was just trying to see what people got out if and see how different the times are. thats it.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:27 PM
  #4  
NathanMorris's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Default Re: (cranberry)

15.7 is deffinitely a stretch of someones imagination with i/h/e on a z6, unless they were stripped to nothingness. Either that or they did something like subtracting their r/t from their ET or something silly like that .

But as for aproximations, who knows - I'd say anything in the mid 16s to high 16s.

There are a lot of calculators out there if you know your weight that you can get an idea. I don't remember the link right now, but do a search for something like quarter mile estimator - there's one good one that takes weight and wheel horsepower in and gives you a fairly accurate estimate.

- Nathan
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:28 PM
  #5  
skunk2eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: tampa, fl
Default Re: (92Lx)

i thik it all depends on the driver, pull a 2.2 or better 60ft and you will easily see low 16's
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #6  
95excoupe's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, NJ, USA
Default Re: (skunk2eg)

I ran a 16.1 with just an intake in an ex coupe way back so a 15.7 I would assume is possible. For the price of I/H/E you could slap a turbo on that sohc and itll actually be fast, just a suggestion
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #7  
93egSIboi's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Default Re: (92Lx)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92Lx &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">15.7 is deffinitely a stretch of someones imagination with i/h/e on a z6, unless they were stripped to nothingness. Either that or they did something like subtracting their r/t from their ET or something silly like that .

But as for aproximations, who knows - I'd say anything in the mid 16s to high 16s.

There are a lot of calculators out there if you know your weight that you can get an idea. I don't remember the link right now, but do a search for something like quarter mile estimator - there's one good one that takes weight and wheel horsepower in and gives you a fairly accurate estimate.

- Nathan</TD></TR></TABLE>

Mid 16s to high 16s? I thought the 93 si ran a 16.5 stock. So why would a partially stripped interior, better tires, and a good I/H/E make him slower? I would think he should atleast be capable of some low 16's and high 15's. Maybe thats just me though...
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:49 PM
  #8  
mwieczorek43's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 0
From: resident ht bully, USA
Default Re: (93egSIboi)

My machanic ran mid-high 15's in my car before I bought it (he took the motor w/him ). He had I/H/E, clutch_flywheel, MSD, Azenis & Rota-Slips. Car was just as stripped as yours. Plus he's a hella-good driver.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 04:51 PM
  #9  
NathanMorris's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Default Re: (mwieczorek43)

I was thinking an EG with a full interior - not a stripped one

I only ran 15.5 my first time at the track, with full interior, nearly full gas tank, my huge integra radiator and everything except a spare in the car - course I'm running with a basically stock (and out of tune right now) B18B1 too, so a slight difference.

Two runs that night were against a D series (it wasn't a mini-me, but it was some kind of vtec head on a different d block) powered 90 civic, fully stripped with carbon fiber hood, cheater slicks, i/h/e, ported and polished, vtec controller, and new pistons at 10.5:1 I believe comperssion - he ran a best of 15.65 w/ a .2 second better 60' than me, just for some "real world" comparison I guess.

- Nathan
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 05:01 PM
  #10  
mwieczorek43's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 0
From: resident ht bully, USA
Default Re: (92Lx)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92Lx &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Two runs that night were against a D series (it wasn't a mini-me, but it was some kind of vtec head on a different d block) powered 90 civic, fully stripped with carbon fiber hood, cheater slicks, i/h/e, ported and polished, vtec controller, and new pistons at 10.5:1 I believe comperssion - he ran a best of 15.65 w/ a .2 second better 60' than me, just for some "real world" comparison I guess.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, Ive had both the D16z6 and B18b's in my hatch. I'll take my LS anyday over the old single-slammer
(Sorry SOHC guys, Just my opinion)
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 05:03 PM
  #11  
hondainspired's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
From: aurora, il, USA
Default Re: (92Lx)

i jus love the d-series casue they're very solid motors... and shizz and i'm on a budget to do anything with it so..... there a bit cheaper to work with...
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 05:05 PM
  #12  
Dacalac's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 0
From: watching you fap in the bathroom
Default Re: (hondainspired)

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=858511
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 05:52 PM
  #13  
Archidictus's Avatar
Unceasing Measure
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 6
From: Columbus Ohio
Default

If I can run a 16.7 with a bone-stock (airbox and everything), 250k mile motor and transmission on 185/65 R14 all-seasons with a 2.4 60 foot I'm sure you can pull a high 15 out of a solid I/H/E setup with better tires and/or a 60 foot. The 16.7 was my first time at the strip in a front-drive car. I can pull consistant 2.2's with **** tires in my brother's GSR hatchback now, so I assume even my beat-*** car could fly down the track in less than 16.5.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 07:06 PM
  #14  
Civic_95_Si's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, Ky, USA
Default Re:

my 95 si. 109whp/95.2ft lbs. No back seat. 185/60/14's @ 20psi.

9.8@71 with a 2.20 60ft.

Mid-low 15's in the1/4 if i had to assume.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 09:46 PM
  #15  
Outrun's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,694
Likes: 88
From: Rancho Relacso, CA, USA
Default Re: Any one with a eg hatch that had a z6 with I/H/E only Whats your Best times? (cranberry)

There are so many variables, but the biggest is the driver. Heck, IHE only dropped my times a couple of tenths and raised my trapspeed by like, half a mile per hour.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 09:49 PM
  #16  
slammed_93_hatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
From: cali
Default Re: Any one with a eg hatch that had a z6 with I/H/E only Whats your Best times? (Outrun)

defently i have seen a 1994 civic SI with full interior I/H/E and azenis run 14.9's ALL night long

i have also seen a civic HX with intake and exhaust, and strped interior run 15.7

then i have seen 1999 civic si with I/H/E run 16.0 flat. driver is the major part of the time
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 10:09 PM
  #17  
cranberry's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,475
Likes: 0
From: Working in the NRBG, Garage
Default

thanks for the feed back. im just wondering what people have done with theirs. im going to slap a turbo on and i just want to know where im at stock. i plan on using my friends 1000lbs drag srpings so yeah. ill let you guys know what i pull when i get to run.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #18  
Calvinator's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,169
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, California
Default Re: Any one with a eg hatch that had a z6 with I/H/E only Whats your Best times? (slammed_93_hatch)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by slammed_93_hatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">defently i have seen a 1994 civic SI with full interior I/H/E and azenis run 14.9's ALL night long

i have also seen a civic HX with intake and exhaust, and strped interior run 15.7

then i have seen 1999 civic si with I/H/E run 16.0 flat. driver is the major part of the time</TD></TR></TABLE>

haha damn 99 si running 16 flat. That sucks.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 10:18 PM
  #19  
cranberry's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,475
Likes: 0
From: Working in the NRBG, Garage
Default Re: Any one with a eg hatch that had a z6 with I/H/E only Whats your Best times? (xtremeazian)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xtremeazian &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

haha damn 99 si running 16 flat. That sucks. </TD></TR></TABLE>

hows you sohc run? is boost really fun in it? pm me to talk.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #20  
NathanMorris's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Default Re: Any one with a eg hatch that had a z6 with I/H/E only Whats your Best times? (cranberry)

could run 14.9s maybe if he didn't use the clutch at all, and doesn't plan on keeping his transmission.

Driver is important, but um, can't perform miracles.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #21  
cranberry's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,475
Likes: 0
From: Working in the NRBG, Garage
Default

see so many veiws. this is good thanks for the info guys.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 12:18 AM
  #22  
xkpjokerx's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, ca, usa
Default Re: (cranberry)

damn...my civic ex ran 16.9 with touring shortram intake spare tire in trunk
and car adapted impact wrench,backseats,crappy rims...probably from the 80's,
tenzo strut,and a club in my rear seats...hahah...
but also to say my clutch slips in high rpm..its ok for everyday driving but once it reaches about 7- 7.2 rpm itll grind.....fucked up clutch...oh well...
tell me how its goes
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 02:34 AM
  #23  
jdmsiR20's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,194
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Default Re: (xkpjokerx)

d16z6 = d15b (kinda)

in my cx hatch.... chipped ecu, flywheel, clutch, header... 15.0

dont have the slip though, so dont bitch about it.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 04:32 AM
  #24  
92BlackSi's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: KW, ON Canada
Default

I ran a 15.88@86.5MPH with 111.5 WHP and 100 TQ

Mods: Ebay CAI and slipping clutch

Going to replace the clutch (OEM one) this coming spring (in Canada - May haha) and have a catback now. Going for 15.6's
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 05:32 AM
  #25  
93civiccxhatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Monett, Missouri, U.S.
Default Re: (92Lx)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92Lx &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">15.7 is deffinitely a stretch of someones imagination with i/h/e on a z6, unless they were stripped to nothingness. Either that or they did something like subtracting their r/t from their ET or something silly like that .

But as for aproximations, who knows - I'd say anything in the mid 16s to high 16s.

There are a lot of calculators out there if you know your weight that you can get an idea. I don't remember the link right now, but do a search for something like quarter mile estimator - there's one good one that takes weight and wheel horsepower in and gives you a fairly accurate estimate.

- Nathan</TD></TR></TABLE>

I ran 16.1 in my cx with a d15b7, no map sensor, 13 inch wheels, and a cx tranny. That was with a 2.35 60 foot time. All I have is i/h/e. I would expect at least a mid 15 out of a z6. If I had an ex/si tranny I could run a mid 15.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:35 PM.