Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

156hp correct???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #1  
aznsins88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Madison, Florida, China
Default 156hp correct???

I finally got into the shop today and got my 1994 integra gsr on it. I have the standard i/h/e, cam gears, pulley kit, clutch kit, 7lb flywheel, high flow cat., and was wondering if my car should be makin more than 156 only with those mods? are the numbers correct?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 05:06 PM
  #2  
LSvtec03's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default Re: 156hp correct??? (aznsins88)

you do realize that half of the things you listed don't actually create horsepower...
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 05:20 PM
  #3  
aznsins88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Madison, Florida, China
Default Re: 156hp correct??? (LSvtec03)

i kno but wat im saying is that arent gsr's at like 170hp?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 05:25 PM
  #4  
Bbasso's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,261
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: 156hp correct??? (aznsins88)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aznsins88 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i kno but wat im saying is that arent gsr's at like 170hp?</TD></TR></TABLE>

At the crank, not the wheels.

example... itrs are 195 at the crank and about 160 at the wheels.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 05:27 PM
  #5  
qcktegls's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: PA, U.S
Default Re: 156hp correct??? (Bbasso)

sounds about right but man you gotta get some camshafts. you put those in and u will kick a good amount more
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 05:27 PM
  #6  
aznsins88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Madison, Florida, China
Default Re: 156hp correct??? (Bbasso)

o ok so mine are about correct then?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #7  
94gsr_vtc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Western Burbs, IL, US
Default Re: 156hp correct??? (aznsins88)

yeah that sounds pretty good
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #8  
omrigaron's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: van buren, ar, usa
Default

thats what i thought when i first dynoed my turbo ls and only got 178 (6 psi). i thought i got jipped, but who cares, i feels a whole lot better than that stock number!!

now with the turbo ls/vtec (8 psi) i got 207. AND IT FEELS GOOD!!
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #9  
aznsins88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Madison, Florida, China
Default Re: (omrigaron)

yea it does feel different. You can feel the power change when your driving. as long as i can feel the difference, the numbers dont matter...for now atleast.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 10:06 PM
  #10  
Mr.Chow's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 0
From: small town, WI, USA
Default Re: (aznsins88)

wow! you are an idiot
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #11  
s2kkid's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: Stockbridge, GA
Default Re: (Mr.Chow)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr.Chow &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow! you are an idiot</TD></TR></TABLE>


Wow! Your a piece of ****

His question was perfectly valid, so stfu.

In conclusion, 156 WHP sounds correct for a mild modded engine such as yours.

Keep on modding
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #12  
MikeSarr_GSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 1
From: Behind The Camera,, FL, USA
Default Re: (vtecluder97)

true. I like asking another quesion though. what is the value of whp/tq at crossover and what does the engine response feel like? I have found if
you have the time to tune and can make about 125 at x over and about
165-170whp on GSR gears, you have a smooth driving street car. I would
reccomend to our host that a set of stage1 skunk cams would work nicely
to add about 12-18whp with IHE and vafc. Untuned, IHE from 156 with
stock fuel pressure and a bit of intake cam advance at 17-18BTDC, 170
would be an accurate estimate at 10:1 using the GSR IM and TB without
more precise tuning. you can achieve a nice, flat tq bell and the car will
feel very solid as well. this tends to be a prefrence of mine, by the way.
I am not much into the peaky, poppy VTEC powerband for the longer
GSR gearing. my $.02 it seems like you are making accurate SAE #s
for your setup. I bet I could find you the 4 you lack with basic tricks
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 05:39 AM
  #13  
boostjunkie757's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: good bye va...hello florida!!
Default Re: (omrigaron)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by omrigaron &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats what i thought when i first dynoed my turbo ls and only got 178 (6 psi). i thought i got jipped, but who cares, i feels a whole lot better than that stock number!!

now with the turbo ls/vtec (8 psi) i got 207. AND IT FEELS GOOD!!</TD></TR></TABLE>


you need tuning.....BAD.

you could be making a whole hell of a lot more power....
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 07:05 AM
  #14  
notmightydx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
From: waukeagan, il, lake
Default Re: (boostjunkie757)

i pulled 170 w/ i/h/e skunk2 manifold, skunk2 ecu, clutch kit/flywhee, and a skunk2 valve train minus cams(dont ask i bought it this way). i plan to get cams because thats what EVERYONE is recomending to me.

those are good numbers IMO.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 07:06 AM
  #15  
aznsins88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Madison, Florida, China
Default

omfg i just ****** found out that i have b16 cams in my car...ooo im so pissed...im gonna kill someone!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 07:08 AM
  #16  
aznsins88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Madison, Florida, China
Default Re: (notmightydx)

nice numbers, how much did all those parts cost and can u feel a difference when u put it in?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 07:31 AM
  #17  
notmightydx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
From: waukeagan, il, lake
Default Re: (aznsins88)

to be honest i bought the car from a friend of mine he spent ruffly 2500 on parts not including labor. i rode in the car before and after the build it was an insane differnce!!! IMO but i woud get skun2 stage 1 cam you should be able to make nice power w/ those and maybe even get cam gears. good luck
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 07:32 AM
  #18  
aznsins88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Madison, Florida, China
Default Re: (notmightydx)

yea i got some str cam gears, im just in need of IM and Cams, i need those badly...can i have yours which IM would u suggest?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 07:43 AM
  #19  
notmightydx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
From: waukeagan, il, lake
Default Re: (aznsins88)

no you can not have mine! you can buy my gsr cams for 100 bucks if ya want. i am seeling the manifold for 200... good luck
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 08:34 AM
  #20  
Tuner Eddy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,715
Likes: 0
From: Alabama, USA
Default

2 fast 2 furious avatar :lol:
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 10:57 AM
  #21  
senseiturtle's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, La
Default Re: (Shift_Vtec)

1- Why would someone put B16 cams in a B18? Is there something beneficial to that?


2- 156whp is about right with those mods. Dynos have a great way of disappointing people.

3- The turbo guy with an LS-VTEC @ 8psi and &lt;250 whp needs some serious tuning. You're probably running rich as hell. How's your gas mileage? Lots of backfire?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #22  
..::91TEG-G2::..'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 0
Default Re: (senseiturtle)

156whp is pretty good.. keep in mind too, its a 94.. might wanna do a compression and leak down test to make sure you have even compression across all cyl's.. also might wanna try some sea foam. that'll help your engine run alot smoother and might be able to milk her for a few more ponies
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 11:56 AM
  #23  
iH8RICERZ's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 12,489
Likes: 2
From: Newark/Bay Area, CA., USA
Default Re: (..::91TEG-G2::..)

your number seem right for the parts you have. I have a 94 gsr, and theres potential to make it crank out some big numbers if you do the build right and get the right parts. If you do get a single stage manifold, be sure to get a chipped ecu along with that since your gsr ecu wont run the iab's. skunk2 IM will run you about $200-$300. I've seen a couple in the classifieds brand new for $225 shipped or so. Also, cams will make a huge difference as well.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #24  
qcktegls's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: PA, U.S
Default Re: (iH8RICERZ)

skunk2 manifold. its good you got cam gears cause they let the cams run wild when u put them in.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2004 | 02:37 PM
  #25  
W.O.P.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 0
From: elVap tricks for me
Default Re: 156hp correct??? (LSvtec03)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LSvtec03 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you do realize that half of the things you listed don't actually create horsepower...</TD></TR></TABLE> what do you expect? look at his avatar
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 AM.