Cable VS. Hydraulic Trans
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 3
From: Chicagoland, IL
Re: Cable VS. Hydraulic Trans (DelSolKid)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DelSolKid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This maybe a dumb question, but does anyone prefer a cable to a Hydraulic trans of vice versa? Thx</TD></TR></TABLE>
Hydraulic for me. Cable clutches get sticky and wear, and have to be adjusted periodically. (in my experience).
Not worth swapping anything for though-- both are functional.
-Chris
(Hahaha, yes it was a dumb question, in case you were wondering. All ITR's are hydraulic.... why'd you post here?)
Hydraulic for me. Cable clutches get sticky and wear, and have to be adjusted periodically. (in my experience).
Not worth swapping anything for though-- both are functional.
-Chris
(Hahaha, yes it was a dumb question, in case you were wondering. All ITR's are hydraulic.... why'd you post here?)
B*a*n*n*e*d
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver WA
Re: Cable VS. Hydraulic Trans (ek9jdm)
now why in the **** is this in the itr forum?
no type r ever has had anything to do with a cable tranny, ever
unless you consider a siR a type rrrrr, or unless you want to buy a cable tranny i have a b16 y1 lsd in my garage
no type r ever has had anything to do with a cable tranny, ever
unless you consider a siR a type rrrrr, or unless you want to buy a cable tranny i have a b16 y1 lsd in my garage
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
