All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

3" exhaust...too big for n/a?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:22 PM
  #1  
Chillinit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 2
From: T dot, O, Hemp Nation
Default 3" exhaust...too big for n/a?

I have my 3" exhaust from my turbo setup and I'm wondering if I can use it on my n/a setup.

Setup details.

-b18c1 plant...81.5mm bore
-12.0: 1 compression
-buddy spec 3+ cams
-upgraded valvetrain

Will I lose too much torque?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:34 PM
  #2  
null.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 0
From: BAY AREA/OC
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (Chillinit)

you're not pushing in alot of air compared to having turbo. 3" is too big for n/a, you will lose back pressure. may want to cut it down to 2.5" or 2.25"
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:48 PM
  #3  
AllMotorMark's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ontario, Canada
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (EJ7COUPE)

i bet you make more power on the 3 inch, don't listen to all these back pressure "miths" its not about back pressure its about scavanging, you will not loose hp running the 3 inch, go for it
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 08:18 PM
  #4  
1allmotordc2's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: pomona, ca, usa
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (Chillinit)

you are going to lose a lot of back pressure
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #5  
AllMotorMark's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ontario, Canada
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (1allmotordc2)

yes you are LOL
, less back pressure = equals more power
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #6  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (AllMotorMark)

yeah i doubt youd lose that much..people make more power usually open header right?so why would 3 inch make u lose power??i'd say just use your current exhaust
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #7  
98itr0448's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Tn, us
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (GOLDBERG)

less backpressure= more power but loud as hell on n/a.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #8  
Ti3d in's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (GOLDBERG)

Backpressure is bad, but it helps keep exhaust velocity up, which creates more torque to an extent.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 03:27 AM
  #9  
Chillinit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 2
From: T dot, O, Hemp Nation
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (GOLDBERG)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GOLDBERG &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah i doubt youd lose that much..people make more power usually open header right?so why would 3 inch make u lose power??i'd say just use your current exhaust</TD></TR></TABLE>

This was one of my reasons for posting this. People run open header at the track all the time and clock better times. Is it because they are actually making more power or the fact that the runs are being made minus the weight of the exhuast?

How much louder will the 3" be?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 03:43 AM
  #10  
rice4life's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: Carlisle, PA, usa
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (Chillinit)

3" exhaust on NA car is going to be loud as hell, i did it before. for some unknown reason, my 3" exhaust was even louder than an open header car. i guess the exhaust pipe just amplify the sound like a trumpet. you will loose some low to mid rpm torque but will gain hp on top end.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 04:24 AM
  #11  
zz10xx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: sydney, nsw, australia
Default

i have 3" on and its the loudest exhaust ive ever heard.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 05:24 AM
  #12  
98 coupedelux's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa, us
Default Re: (zz10xx)

i have a b16a in my coupe and before i did the swap i had a boosted y8. keept all the piping which is 3" kept my apexi dunk on there and it isnt loud at all i idle realy quiet and the vtec over sounds the exhaust
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:16 AM
  #13  
Sr20 B12's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, FL, US of A
Default Re: (98 coupedelux)

A 3" on N/A is prefect for it your running huge cams. Anything other than that is not good.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #14  
hype r 555's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: chillin at yo mammy house, FL, usa
Default Re: (Sr20 turbo B12)

if you didn't have the cams i would say no go 2.5 but with those cams and your setup you shold be just fine .. you notice a little bit of low end loss , but you will make up for it in top end gains ... jmo
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #15  
S@nt0s's Avatar
Munkyw3rkz.webs.com
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 22,166
Likes: 1
From: PUTTIN UR MOUTH ON CURBZ CPT, SoCal
Default Re: (lsed-eg)

i plan on steppin up to a 3" on my 2.0L
but for a 1.8 i think 2.5" is enough.....but having less backpressure will take a bit of torque away, i say is so so since your only a 81.5 bore maybe if you had at least a 84 then go for it but let us knwo how it goes!
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 12:09 PM
  #16  
All Motor EH2's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: bay area, ca
Default

I'd say stay with your 3"
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 02:46 PM
  #17  
codeh22a4's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: puerto rico, p.r, fajardo
Default Re: (lsed-eg)

question,i have a 99 prelude base manual with 11:1:0 high compression pistons type s cams(jdm lude type s)dc sport header,if i put a 2.5 custom made without cat. and resonator just plain 2.5 all the way from header to muffler will i lose backpressure?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 07:34 PM
  #18  
Sr20 B12's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, FL, US of A
Default Re: (codeh22a4)

Whats all this worry about backpressure? You want as little back pressure as possible, espically on a high reving engine. 2.5" is ok for your Prelude engine. 3" is also ok. But don't expect hugh power gains from either one (unless you have an exhaust cam with huge over lap or spraying).
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 09:14 PM
  #19  
BlackRocket's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: Plainview, MN, U.S.
Default

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ti3d in &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Backpressure is bad, but it helps keep exhaust velocity up, which creates more torque to an extent.</TD></TR></TABLE>

with a 3 inch and no back pressure your air is just slowly flowing out instead of smooth and fastly being forst out, if anyone can kinda understand that.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:23 PM
  #20  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (Chillinit)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chillinit &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

This was one of my reasons for posting this. People run open header at the track all the time and clock better times. Is it because they are actually making more power or the fact that the runs are being made minus the weight of the exhuast?

How much louder will the 3" be?</TD></TR></TABLE>

they "usually" make more power..but not always
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 09:03 AM
  #21  
specie's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,503
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, FL, USA
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (GOLDBERG)

No backpressure NO back pressure. You do not want back pressure, back pressure does not increase the exhaust velocity, back pressure does NOTHING to help your power output. It just hinders the scavengering effect. You get more torque or better low/midrange with smaller exahaust diameter because gas velocity is faster in a smaller pipe vs one that has larger diameter. It has nothing to do with backpressure.

I had a 3" thermal exhaust with a rather large magnaflow resonator and it didn't sound too loud, but it was louder than a 2.25" exhaust setup. I didn't notice much of a difference because I switched to a jdm dc 4-1 header when I switched to the 2.25" thermal.

I ran open header at the track and ran the same time as I did when I had the exhaust on.

Are people making more power with open header?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 09:40 AM
  #22  
DA6righthand's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (Chillinit)

i found this link somehwere, i think it ws off of tt.net. it might help ya decide http://www.nsxprime.com/FAQ/Mi...y.htm

thanx
justin
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #23  
Sour Diesel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Dodging Potholes
Default

Well since you have the 3 inch piping already, take it off and put on 2.5, go to the track or have it dynoed. If you get more power keep the 2.5, if you get less put the 3.0 back on.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 11:54 AM
  #24  
rev limiter's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: the hague, holland
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (nohondayet)

great article but why are there na people with 220-250 whp running open header at the strip ??? According the article you will make more power with exhaust
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #25  
codeh22a4's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: puerto rico, p.r, fajardo
Default Re: 3" exhaust...too big for n/a? (rev limiter)

well i got a 99 lude 2.2vtec with a custom made 2 1/4 exhaust without cat or resonaitor,should i get a 2.5 custom exhaust without cat and resonator?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:24 PM.