Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 12:51 PM
  #1  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results





The engines likes fuel, that is the bottom line. I tried leaning out the powerband and it lost power, 12:1 AF Ratio is where it likes to be at.
Also messed with the ingition timing a little. Went from 14 degrees to 16/17 and it gaines some nice low end as well as made the top end much smoother.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 12:58 PM
  #2  
fsarfino's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Rockford, IL, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

just curious did you dyno at the old CR if so what were the specs on that

BTW Glad to see your rebuild is running great and congrats on the #'s
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 01:25 PM
  #3  
InfamousRS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,094
Likes: 0
From: The Pacific, Northwest
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (dohcvtec16)

Didn't your old setup make that much power??? I could remember wrong though.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 01:35 PM
  #4  
Tomakit's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (BLK94RS)

1) that's a lot of tq.

2) what's going on at 4k and 5k rpms?

Tom


[Modified by Tomakit, 5:36 PM 12/16/2001]
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 01:56 PM
  #5  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (BLK94RS)

Didn't your old setup make that much power??? I could remember wrong though.
Look at the charts man, it shows the old vs new.

Gained 6-8 WHP and 8-10 TQ throughout. DONT look at peak numbers.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 02:19 PM
  #6  
FAST94GSR's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
From: Skunk2, rulez
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

heard you're goin vtec man.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 02:29 PM
  #7  
MrFatBooty's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (FAST94GSR)

Wasn't "The Great Buildup" including a VTEC head? I remember seeing the 170 hp number in your sig before you gave the play-by-play on the buildup.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 02:34 PM
  #8  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (MrFatBooty)

Nope, the great rebuild was only the bottom end...Im still running the stock B20 head...for about a week more though...then VTEC!

I should be VTEC in less then 2 weeks...stand by for play-by-play again


[Modified by HX_Guy, 3:35 PM 12/16/2001]
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 02:36 PM
  #9  
Tomakit's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

damn, you go through mods/upgrades like its water.

Tom

im just jealous, thats all, hehe
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 03:18 PM
  #10  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (Tomakit)

I look like Im a little rich bitch huh? LOL..Im not really.
The bottom end rebuild stripped me of money..I had $1.53 in the bank at one point..seriously. LOL
As for the VTEC...all the parts I sold will basically cover the VTEC conversion.
Itll cost me like $100-$200 out of pocket..not bad huh.

Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 04:06 PM
  #11  
Rhetoric's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

Man, didnt you just start your 1k break in period like last week? I have 260 so far, I'll be there though!
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 04:37 PM
  #12  
non-VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

wow looks good............it's to bad your decided to go VTEC now...........good luck with that....i'm sure a B20/VTEC will really scream.......i'm still waiting to see a 180-190whp all motor non-VTEC engine........maybe when i'm done my new build up i'll be up around there.......
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 04:45 PM
  #13  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (non-VTEC)

Im sure with some head work I would see 180-185 WHP easy...so 180-190 is definately not out of the question...maybe even throw in a nicer header and get close to 190-195.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 04:51 PM
  #14  
Halo's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 0
From: All Motor, CA, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (non-VTEC)

with his bottom end he can easily acheive above 200+whp with the following mods

1)B18C head
2)01 ITR cams
3)1mm Oversized valves
4) Kamikaze 4-1
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 05:04 PM
  #15  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (Halo)

Im going a little bigger on the cams..but not quite as big as JUN3s.
Ill probably do something like Skunk2 Stage 1 cams...which have been dyno'd and made 10 WHP over ITR cams. I expect to be around 205 WHP with a B16 head, ITR manifold and the Skunk2 cams.

I would like JUN3s..but there are also something I dont like. The cams have to be revved sky high to get theyre real power...9000+ RPMS! Also, you need some strong valve springs..which means more money. Also Ive heard the stock B16 Lost Motion Assemblies cant really handle cams over 11.5mm of lift..and the JUN3s are 12.5mm I believe.
The power is nice though...a friends of mine is making 220 WHP @ 7800 RPMs with them..thast 60 more WHP tehn me at 7800 RPMS! Thats INSANE! (He peaks at 225 WHP @ 8000-9000 RPMs)
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 05:30 PM
  #16  
Halo's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,267
Likes: 0
From: All Motor, CA, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

check your email VAL, I want to send you my dyno graph and if you could put it up that would be cool. I am making 161whp with a completely stock bottom B18B with the the stock exhaust! All my power is coming essentially from my head. With all the dough you dropped those figures should be higher. However due to the newness of the setup, the # will increase as everything gets broken in
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 05:40 PM
  #17  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (Halo)

I sent you a email back.

Do you have AOL IM? If so..hit me up, my screen name is HXCivicVal
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 07:31 PM
  #18  
InfamousRS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,094
Likes: 0
From: The Pacific, Northwest
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

So you decided to go vtec over turbo? I remember about a week or 2 ago, you said you were either going tubor or vtec. Is there a possiblity of Turbo in future? Even though you have to change out the pistons.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2001 | 08:35 PM
  #19  
Mr. Softee's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Islip, CA, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (BLK94RS)

val if i were you id go with toda As or Jun2 / ITR combo.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2001 | 06:21 AM
  #20  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (97lstegra)

The Skunk2 cams made 5 WHP over the TODA As which made 4 WHP over the JUN2/ITR setup (but lost midrange). So the Skunk2s would make 9 WHP over the JUN2/ITR setup and still be able to keep good midrange from what Ive seen.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2001 | 08:17 AM
  #21  
Project X's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

Man...that's mad torque. What happened at 4-5k rpm? It looks like a huge surge of TQ!

BTW, for your VTEC, are you getting a B16, B18C, or B18C5 head?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2001 | 08:20 AM
  #22  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (Project X)

The CAI provides that surge at 4-5K. I dyno'd teh car without teh CAI and lost 16 WHP and 18 TQ at 4500-5000! It was nuts!
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2001 | 10:17 AM
  #23  
non-VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

wow............what kind of CAI do you have again?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2001 | 10:29 AM
  #24  
HX_Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,483
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (non-VTEC)

DC D.A.C. with Injen Cold Air Extension. Measures 38" from TB to filter (not including filter length)
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2001 | 10:32 AM
  #25  
non-VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
Default Re: 9.6:1 vs 11.4:1 Compression Dyno Results (HX_Guy)

what's the tube diameter?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:10 AM.