Early 90's cars are pretty (not dated).

2005 cars are dated.

You know blue, it's hard to follow your logic sometimes. I'm not saying you have to like the 2005 cars. But it doesn't make sense they're dated without using that same adjective to describe cars 10~13 years before.

 

Thanks,
I know we talked about this one day at the track, Sorry again. Growing up sucks.

 

Which F310 you liked better? The early 1996 low nose?


Or the latter 1996 high nose?

 

Timeless but of a certain time?!

 

i like the low nose

at this time

 

Chrysler building handles like **** tho

 

It will win the same amount of races as the MP4/31 doe

 

are you willing to put money on that?

 

Oh yes, I'm all in.

 

Any of joos watching the run offs? Slow cars, no aero = good racing

 

Unless it's an unnecessarily expensive procession I'm not watching

 

You guys over here arguing about which is best and I like them all? Only watched f1 for 7-8 years though thinking I might go find some old stuff to watch.

 

F1 1997-2000 was amazing...but I doubt watching the races now would have the same meaning as it did back then

 

I'll take a look I'd still be interested. I only really started watching at Hamilton's first year so anything before that should be fun to see.

 

B-Spec champ! Get in where your Honda Fit wins.

 

The track I'm racing on this weekend is pictured to the right of the "94" - looks like a flying V on its side. Pittsburgh International Race Complex.

 

like a boomerang?!

 

yis. Full Circuit: North and South circuits combined.

 

Looks like fun. I'll allow it.

 

 

massively is a F1 word though

 

FTFY

 

Unless you mean meowssive understeer? Cause that's definitely JB.

 

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x20kv17_f1-1996-gp15-portugal-estoril-race-bbc_shortfilms

 

^^^^^^^go to 27:00 for the race start.