AEBS intake manifold?
How does the AEBS intake manifold compare to the VictorX from edlebrock? I've seen a lot of you guys running this manifold, and it's about half the price of the Victor X. Let me know what your experiences are with this mani. thanks
i was using the AEBS manifold on my turbo B16, and to be honest i dyno'd more with my stock manifold. to me it just looked like a bad product, then i did some research and found it WAS gonna be bought by edelbrock but it had bad leaks in the aluminums pores.
i switched to the Victor X and i notice a much larger gain uptop, plus i dyno'd a bit more with it, i am very pleased with the Victor X
i switched to the Victor X and i notice a much larger gain uptop, plus i dyno'd a bit more with it, i am very pleased with the Victor X
the aebs im has been proven to make more power than the stock itr and the skunk2. but i dont know how it campares with the jg but it should be very clost to it in terms of performance
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by riceball777 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the aebs im has been proven to make more power than the stock itr and the skunk2. but i dont know how it campares with the jg but it should be very clost to it in terms of performance </TD></TR></TABLE>
you said it has been "proven", but can anyone back this up with a duno chart? Im looking at an AEBS for my B18C1.
you said it has been "proven", but can anyone back this up with a duno chart? Im looking at an AEBS for my B18C1.
Trending Topics
there is a dyno on this, the abs makes 2-3 hp more than a PORTED itr manifold.
you dont want to get a jg unless you runing upwards of 12 cr, or boost. if you are all motor get the aebs. it will has great longer runners for those that crave good low and mid range and the top is fine, where as the jg is totall opposite, short *** runners mainly only good for top end.
you dont want to get a jg unless you runing upwards of 12 cr, or boost. if you are all motor get the aebs. it will has great longer runners for those that crave good low and mid range and the top is fine, where as the jg is totall opposite, short *** runners mainly only good for top end.
Thanks man, I've been waiting to see someone explain the diffences in runners and hp distribution. Thanks for the info, i'm definately leaning towards the AEBS intake mani now, also becuase it's cheaper. I'd would rather give up some top end for more low end, even a little difference helps down low. thanks
just noticed the revhard intake manifold on ebay, any good? here's a link
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...es_IT
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...es_IT
well your not goig to give up to end, you are only giving up top end compared to the edlebrock, the aebs is bascially a better itr, and the edleborke is made for top power only
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




