finally hit the 10
third honda to touch the 10 up north in quebec.
60 feet : 1.71
1/8 : 7.144
1/4 : 10.98@129.83 mph
eg b16a2 stock except piston 8.5:1
here's a little pic :

who said b16 stock rod can't handle boost ???
60 feet : 1.71
1/8 : 7.144
1/4 : 10.98@129.83 mph
eg b16a2 stock except piston 8.5:1
here's a little pic :

who said b16 stock rod can't handle boost ???
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 0
From: Bluffton/Hilton Head,SC / Ft. Lauderdale, FL, usa
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Modify »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
who said b16 stock rod can't handle boost ???</TD></TR></TABLE>
congrats man...how much boost and what does this car weigh?
who said b16 stock rod can't handle boost ???</TD></TR></TABLE>
congrats man...how much boost and what does this car weigh?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bruceleeroy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
congrats man...how much boost and what does this car weigh?</TD></TR></TABLE>
congrats man...how much boost and what does this car weigh?</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HybridHatch88 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How much power are you making?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by alld16a »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My guess is 360 whp</TD></TR></TABLE>
Bahh, I bet he is making the stock 160 HP at the crank.
Bahh, I bet he is making the stock 160 HP at the crank.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Modify »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">third honda to touch the 10 up north in quebec.
60 feet : 1.71
1/8 : 7.144
1/4 : 10.98@129.83 mph
</TD></TR></TABLE>
congrats, very nice time
what tire size are you using? what rpm you fininsh in 4th? im guessing you have a stock b16 geared tranny?
whos the other two who ran 10's?
60 feet : 1.71
1/8 : 7.144
1/4 : 10.98@129.83 mph
</TD></TR></TABLE>
congrats, very nice time
what tire size are you using? what rpm you fininsh in 4th? im guessing you have a stock b16 geared tranny?
whos the other two who ran 10's?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Modify »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">third honda to touch the 10 up north in quebec.
60 feet : 1.71
1/8 : 7.144
1/4 : 10.98@129.83 mph
eg b16a2 stock except piston 8.5:1
here's a little pic :

who said b16 stock rod can't handle boost ???</TD></TR></TABLE>
Is that the new starting stick in that kids hand?
Congrats on the time
60 feet : 1.71
1/8 : 7.144
1/4 : 10.98@129.83 mph
eg b16a2 stock except piston 8.5:1
here's a little pic :

who said b16 stock rod can't handle boost ???</TD></TR></TABLE>
Is that the new starting stick in that kids hand?
Congrats on the time
didn't go on the dyno with the car, it's been tune on the drag strip.
25 psi with a t3 60-1 .70 .83
the car weight 840 kg and the tire are 24.5x9x13
finish the 1/4 at 8500 with a gsr trany.
the picture is from a little track but the 10 second pass has been done at napierville dragway in montreal.
25 psi with a t3 60-1 .70 .83
the car weight 840 kg and the tire are 24.5x9x13
finish the 1/4 at 8500 with a gsr trany.
the picture is from a little track but the 10 second pass has been done at napierville dragway in montreal.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Modify »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the car weight 840 kg
</TD></TR></TABLE>
whoa....isnt 840kg=1851 lbs?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
whoa....isnt 840kg=1851 lbs?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JOEY F. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
whoa....isnt 840kg=1851 lbs?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
What would be needed to get a 1992 - 1995 Honda Civic Hatchback CX that weight?
Would carbon fiber hood, lightweight wheels (under 10lb per rim), no back seats, no passenger seats, no spare tire, 15 lb battery, be enough?
whoa....isnt 840kg=1851 lbs?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
What would be needed to get a 1992 - 1995 Honda Civic Hatchback CX that weight?
Would carbon fiber hood, lightweight wheels (under 10lb per rim), no back seats, no passenger seats, no spare tire, 15 lb battery, be enough?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cpforyou »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
What would be needed to get a 1992 - 1995 Honda Civic Hatchback CX that weight?
Would carbon fiber hood, lightweight wheels (under 10lb per rim), no back seats, no passenger seats, no spare tire, 15 lb battery, be enough?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
No passenger seat/rear seats, bogarts all around or other light weight rims, without driver is about 1900 lbs. so 1852 lbs doesn't seem to be to much weight reduction... Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm going off of my friend(s) eg hatches...
What would be needed to get a 1992 - 1995 Honda Civic Hatchback CX that weight?
Would carbon fiber hood, lightweight wheels (under 10lb per rim), no back seats, no passenger seats, no spare tire, 15 lb battery, be enough?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
No passenger seat/rear seats, bogarts all around or other light weight rims, without driver is about 1900 lbs. so 1852 lbs doesn't seem to be to much weight reduction... Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm going off of my friend(s) eg hatches...


