Drag Racing Drag Racing (legal) & Associated Topics

2006 NHRA new rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 08:31 PM
  #1  
RA166E's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: WA, USA
Default 2006 NHRA new rules

GENERAL REGULATIONS

Effective Jan. 1, 2006, where a Snell-rated helmet is required in NHRA competition, the Snell 90 helmets will no longer be allowed.
— Translation: Your Snell 90 helmet is now junk.

Any vehicle that runs faster than 135 mph must meet minimum requirements for 9.99-second vehicles, which include an NHRA chassis certification, NHRA competition license, and updated safety requirements.
— Translation: After all the years you avoided having to buy the safety equipment for a 9.99 or quicker machine because your fast street car wouldn't hook up on street tires, you now must pay.




The Protective Clothing section states which jacket and/or pants are needed for 10.00 and slower and 9.99 and quicker supercharged, turbocharged, or nitrous-equipped cars, with or without a full OEM or .024-inch steel firewall.
— Translation: ...and you're going to be buying more stuff, too.

Plastic brackets to secure bottles filled with nitrous oxide are prohibited.
— Translation: To the three guys who still used plastic brackets...get your act together.

Four-wheel-drive is permitted per class requirements; four-wheel-drive vehicles running quicker than 9.99 are prohibited.
— To all the DSM guys who've spent $1 million dollars each, we have no idea where this one came from.

During competition, NHRA prohibits the use of a portable computer while the vehicle is in operation. Such items as a laptop, PDA, Palm Pilot, programmer, and the like may not be installed or located in a vehicle at any point beyond the staging-area ready line. All functions or values must be preset prior to this point.
— If this rule is enforced at local NHRA Member Tracks, they can kiss ninety percent of their Grudge Night business goodbye.

Those are the highlights of the rules revisions. Let the rebuilding and buying begin.

I see "dead" DSM project cars...
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 09:24 PM
  #2  
naturalvx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl, USA
Default Re: 2006 NHRA new rules (RA166E)

That and Ali must be having a heart-attack. Something doesn't seem right about that 4WD rule, I'll bet it is getting clarified soon.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #3  
uglyasscivic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: SLC, utah, USA
Default Re: 2006 NHRA new rules (naturalvx)

nevermind....lol
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 09:45 PM
  #4  
Shep's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: North Lawrence, Oh, Us
Default Re: 2006 NHRA new rules (RA166E)

DSM's are awd not 4wd. I think they meant trucks etc.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
1 2 NV's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 0
From: retired 2/13/10
Default Re: 2006 NHRA new rules (RA166E)

i just read your post on SSR and came here to break the news.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #6  
WillieWillieFast's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, Wa, US
Default Re: 2006 NHRA new rules (1 2 NV)

Is this true for all the classes?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 11:47 PM
  #7  
.RTErnie's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
From: BeLlInGhAm, Wa
Default Re: 2006 NHRA new rules (Shep)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Shep &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">DSM's are awd not 4wd. I think they meant trucks etc. </TD></TR></TABLE>

are you sure? Because if they mean DSM's that is WAAAAY FUCKED UP. Not even remotely amusing to be honest. I will be shitting down someones throat if this nightmare comes true.

&lt;--don't own a dsm, but would feel that Shep, Ali, DSM, and STi owners would all cry.

on second thought they must mean 4wd trucks or else they would be committing suicide.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 06:15 AM
  #8  
Turbo-charged's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,939
Likes: 2
From: Maryland, USA
Default Re: 2006 NHRA new rules (RTErnie)

any new Turbo 4 news?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 06:43 AM
  #9  
tommyten's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,903
Likes: 0
From: Big Wally
Default Re: 2006 NHRA new rules (Turbo-charged)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Turbo-charged &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">any new Turbo 4 news?</TD></TR></TABLE>

I guess just the safety requirements... for now.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 06:43 AM
  #10  
blitz118's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Bronx, NY
Default AWD cars

They're not talking about AWD cars. They're talking about 4X4 trucks. Remember the NHRA just allowed the AWD cars to compete in the hot rod class this year. I can't find anything in the NHRA 2006 sport compact rule book regarding prohibiting AWD cars to compete. Matter of fact they add rules in the NHRA 2006 sports compact rule book for the AWD cars in the hot rod class and they increased the weight limit for the AWD cars in the SRWD class.

http://www.nhraimport.com/APCM...id=11
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 10:24 AM
  #11  
BoostR41's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: southwest, PA, USA
Default Re: AWD cars (blitz118)

so does that mean those safety rules are at all NHRA tracks even if it is an NDRA race. if so that sucks
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 10:30 AM
  #12  
ninesecrx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,093
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, CA, USA
Default Re: AWD cars (BoostR41)

Last time I checked, being safe didnt suck
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #13  
M.A.R.C.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Default Re: AWD cars (ninesecrx)

wow... the changes seem to suck so far.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #14  
little white crx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: crestview, fl, usa
Default Re: AWD cars (M.A.R.C.)

notice the computer rule says "during competion" which equals not testing, so it shouldnt effect test and tune fun and grudge nights
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #15  
Turbo-charged's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,939
Likes: 2
From: Maryland, USA
Default Re: AWD cars (little white crx)

i dont see a problem with the rules....if your going over 135 you should be really close to the 9's anyways.....get a liscense and your safety stuff and call it a day.

the laptop thing is kind of weird but pretty much every engine managment system you dont need the laptop in the car to record any data anyways.

it could def. be a lot worse
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 12:38 PM
  #16  
BoostR41's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: southwest, PA, USA
Default Re: AWD cars (Turbo-charged)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Turbo-charged &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i dont see a problem with the rules....if your going over 135 you should be really close to the 9's anyways.....get a liscense and your safety stuff and call it a day.</TD></TR></TABLE>

for the turbo 4 guys yes but I know of a good many power street cars not even close to 10's yet trapping at 130mph or so. so for my 11 second power street car(true daily drivers in the class) I am gion to need a chute and lisence? sorry that is stupid
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 12:38 PM
  #17  
Turbo-charged's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,939
Likes: 2
From: Maryland, USA
Default Re: AWD cars (BoostR41)

chute is 150 mph+ not 9's.

the 9 second test is more of a 135 test anyways...you just have to trap over 135...not go 9's.

the rules are based on mph for everything else on the 9 second stuff....might as well just be a 135 mph liscense....well i guess thats what they are making it now. the liscense stuff isnt nearly as bad as you guys are making it out to be
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #18  
jlperformance's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Barbourville, KY, US
Default Re: AWD cars (BoostR41)

If I understand it right there are no NDRA races at tracks owned by the NHRA. SO you would not have to worry about that rule affecting you there.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 12:50 PM
  #19  
BoostR41's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: southwest, PA, USA
Default Re: AWD cars (jlperformance)

owned no sanctioned yes I believe there are
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #20  
Johnny O A20 KIller's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Hamden, CT, USA
Default

Atco,NJ is a nhra track and they are tough with nhra rules.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #21  
BoostR41's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: southwest, PA, USA
Default Re: AWD cars (Turbo-charged)

it isn't tough but I work all weekend every weekend. I am lucky to go to 4 events next year unless I find a new job which makes it real hard for me to make my liscense passes
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #22  
seen4ever's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY, US
Default Re: AWD cars (BoostR41)

the hell if i'm going to take my street car with a 6pt cage and convert it to a 10pt cage with a window net. Just isn't going to happen. I have everything else pretty much there, but i can't justify having to cut up my dash and kill my air vents to add 4 more points to the chassis.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 04:47 AM
  #23  
XXXRacing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,822
Likes: 1
From: RocklandCounty, NY, 10901
Default Re: AWD cars (seen4ever)

As it has been said before, the speed on impact is going to hurt someone, not the et on impact. This has been a rule for a while now, just seems like now it is going to be enforced. The Snell helmet rule has always been in place too. Be thankful that you got an extra 5 years out of your helmet this time.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 05:13 AM
  #24  
hondaguyef's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,159
Likes: 1
From: Roseville, CA
Default Re: AWD cars (XXXRacing)

I have a SNELL M95. Is it still legal?

Phil
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 05:27 AM
  #25  
nsxmatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,309
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Default

135 isn't that out of range for alot of people with just real street cars.

I cans see the threads now, "Post your chute on the street pics!!!!11"
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 PM.