Notices

rear disk brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2006, 03:54 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
89 civic si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: stuart, fl, us
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default rear disk brakes

has anyone bought the rear disk brake conversion off hmotors? really are rear disk brakes better, as far as stopping performance ...i really want to do the conversion for looks as i dont like the rear drums..also does anyone know if i have to convert the master cylinder and the booster with this kit.. i searched but i didnt find any details on the hmotors crx rear brakes thanks
Old 10-26-2006, 05:07 PM
  #2  
 
DC_RaceR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hook em
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: rear disk brakes (89 civic si)

It'll be cheaper to get the rear disc for a DA.
Basically the conversion is for looks and easy changing brake pads....
You'll need a BB/MC from EX or DA... should bolt right on...
Old 10-26-2006, 05:09 PM
  #3  
Pirate General...YARRRR
 
Ass$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kills, United States
Posts: 12,355
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: rear disk brakes (DC_RaceR)

these cars are light enough most track racers myself included don't do it.

upsides are looks and ease to work on if you can't deal with drums.

search around for using DA parts.
Old 10-26-2006, 05:13 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
CRX Toad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near Charlotte
Posts: 9,637
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: rear disk brakes (Capt. Blonde Beard)

If I could have a do over with my disc brake conversion I would leave my drums on the back. The disc do not save any weight. They look better yes, they are easier to changes pads, yes but no performance gains.

In fact I would run my drums with the 1st gen HF drums which are aluminum thus making the drum brake setup lighter than the disc setup.

I also road race my car so I can attest to the performance on and off the track.
Old 10-26-2006, 05:22 PM
  #5  
 
angelscrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sutherland, VA, US
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: rear disk brakes (Capt. Blonde Beard)

Actually the drums are way lighter than the disks. When I did the conversion I could not believe how lighter the drums were when I took them off compared to the disks brakes when I carried them out fo the junk yard.

By the way you will need the ebarke cable as well.
Old 10-26-2006, 05:36 PM
  #6  
 
DC_RaceR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hook em
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: rear disk brakes (89 civic si)

I did it on my CRX.. Love it... I don't care much about the weight...
DD car...

Going to do it on my hatch this weekend...


I usually spend at lease 3 hours change brakes on the drum.. Now 20 mins.
Old 10-26-2006, 06:42 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
d16vtecx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM, usa
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: rear disk brakes (CRX Toad)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRX Toad &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If I could have a do over with my disc brake conversion I would leave my drums on the back. The disc do not save any weight. They look better yes, they are easier to changes pads, yes but no performance gains.

In fact I would run my drums with the 1st gen HF drums which are aluminum thus making the drum brake setup lighter than the disc setup.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

i agree
disks are not worth the hassle but its too late for me
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
b20_driven
Mid-West (Sales)
2
07-16-2009 04:19 PM
hondahustle
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
19
07-30-2006 04:39 PM
HANABLE
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
46
04-08-2004 11:08 AM
untitled
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
09-05-2003 02:35 PM



Quick Reply: rear disk brakes



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 AM.