Notices
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Turbo vs N/A

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2002, 04:38 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
VtecMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lexington, KY, USA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo vs N/A

I know this is an age-old Honda question, but I want to know what everyone's opinions on turbo'd cars are, vs. built n/a cars. I know that it is more expensive to make an N/A car go as fast as one that is turbo'd, but I don't really care that much about speed. What I really care about is how fun it is to drive. I know that it is fun to rev an engine to 10,000rpms, and have it make it's peak power at 9k rpms. However, I also know that it's also really fun when the car suddenly puts you in the back of your seat when you reach 3,000rpms. Plus a turbo is actually faster, and quieter. I dunno...somebody help me out. I wanna go CRVtec if I stay all-motor, but with a turbo, I'm thinking a normal CRV setup would be just as good when you're running 20psi.
Old 08-02-2002, 04:44 AM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
D16Z6racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The Emerald City, USA
Posts: 3,025
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (VtecMatt)

Pesonnally, I think a turbo set up will cost more if you do it right. You should build your motor to handle the boost.

example w/ D16Z6:

N/A.....get a motor($900) and build it($3400) = $4300

Turbo...get a motor($900), build it for 12+psi($3400), buy turbo($3000) = $7300

Just estimating on N/A price. The turbo price was a quote I actually got.
Old 08-02-2002, 06:08 AM
  #3  
 
deepnite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: tracy, ca, usa
Posts: 5,196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (VtecMatt)

20lbs boost? thats serious **** man..thought u just wanna have a bit fun cruising now and then..make sure the motor is build up good to handle boost..ive seen improperly tune d motors blow with just 5lbs boost..another less popular alternative is a jackson blower..give u 6 to 9lbs boost without any mods need d to ur motor..i like it cuz uve got a constant flow of power at hand all the time
Old 08-02-2002, 07:04 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
 
VtecMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lexington, KY, USA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (deepnite)

Yeah, 20psi is pretty high, but I've seen a lot of companies that build blocks that can take up to 40 pounds, so it's all relative I guess. Anyways, I'm really not sure how much boost I would be running (still in the early phases of planning), but if I had a turbo'd EG hatchback, I'd want 400-450hp from it. Also, what motor is best turbo'd? I've heard that high-boost Hondas have VTEC disabled...does this mean that an LS or a CRV engine would be a better choice than a GSR or Si, since they are already running without VTEC? Sorry, I'm sure that this is a n00b question...but I'm hoping it is really basic stuff to some of you, so I can get this stuff figured out. Thanks
Old 08-02-2002, 07:37 AM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
97hb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (VtecMatt)

20 pounds on the street = mad wheel spin = not fun
But on the highway be ready to kill anything
Old 08-02-2002, 10:09 AM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Apex i ITR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada currently residing in ATL, GA, USA
Posts: 4,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (97hb)

Best motor to Turbo is a GSR motor in my opinion. You can get 400-450 out of a good built reliably tuned B18C1. LS turbo's are good because the motor doesn't cost nearly as much as the GSR but you have to run way more boost then a GSR to get to your goal of 400 hp.

Have you tried searching on this. Also reliability doesn't mean dick when you start molesting the motor. Go boost for ultimate power and go N/A for slightly less headache and bragging rights.
Old 08-02-2002, 10:15 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
dohcsideSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: connecticut
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (VtecMatt)

Yeah, 20psi is pretty high, but I've seen a lot of companies that build blocks that can take up to 40 pounds, so it's all relative I guess. Anyways, I'm really not sure how much boost I would be running (still in the early phases of planning), but if I had a turbo'd EG hatchback, I'd want 400-450hp from it. Also, what motor is best turbo'd? I've heard that high-boost Hondas have VTEC disabled...does this mean that an LS or a CRV engine would be a better choice than a GSR or Si, since they are already running without VTEC? Sorry, I'm sure that this is a n00b question...but I'm hoping it is really basic stuff to some of you, so I can get this stuff figured out. Thanks
20 psi isn't high for a race car but on the street it would be undrivable.....
as fas as the vtec being disabled......ummm no. the only time i ever heard of this was from TOO on "their" supercharger....so no. get a vtec motor (at least a 1.8&gt...
a crvtec fully built and evething that goes along w/ it is gonna be very expensive i know first hand see my sig....
Old 08-02-2002, 10:20 AM
  #8  
BW
 
BW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (VtecMatt)

I've heard that high-boost Hondas have VTEC disabled...does this mean that an LS or a CRV engine would be a better choice than a GSR or Si, since they are already running without VTEC? Sorry, I'm sure that this is a n00b question...but I'm hoping it is really basic stuff to some of you, so I can get this stuff figured out. Thanks
in high hp they switch out the head completely. who needs the lower rpm lobe when ur drag racing right? all it does it replace it with a non VTEC head because the VTEC is nothing but rolling resistnace which frees up hp and revs. but if u want any semblence of street drivability then i would keep VTEC


[Modified by wrine420, 7:21 PM 8/2/2002]
Old 08-02-2002, 10:36 AM
  #9  
 
EKB18BPR3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: MN or Cali, depends which office Im at
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (VtecMatt)

in my opinion i say go with turbo just cuz i have one and the sound of blowoff valve going off is so addicting...but all motorwill be a lot more reliable and not have to worry about blow ur engine up...but even with built engine, revving at 10g 's still bad for ur car
Old 08-02-2002, 11:18 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
.hugo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gardena, CA
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (dniedacess)

Yeah reving to 10k rpm is bad especially for a street driven car. And that 20lbs of boost is way too much for a street car. I thought you said you didn't care that much about speed.If you want a fast eg, I say go with a turbo b20 running 8-10 psi , that should be fast enough around 13 sec 1/4 miles.
Old 08-04-2002, 08:22 PM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
 
D16Z6racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The Emerald City, USA
Posts: 3,025
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (starang w0ndah)

those prices a got were from Maxx Auto Works in Federal Way. One of the best shops around to build a motor too. http://www.maxxautoworks.com and I'm not saying you have to run 20psi everywhere all day, just saying for a build that can hold it.
Old 08-04-2002, 08:54 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
97hb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo vs N/A (Apex i ITR)

LS turbo's are good because the motor doesn't cost nearly as much as the GSR but you have to run way more boost then a GSR to get to your goal of 400 hp.
How much more boost we talkin, 5, 10, 15psi??? I really don't think its that much difference.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pjr710
Forced Induction
1
01-05-2009 05:14 PM
lmike6453
Acura Integra
26
02-04-2008 08:44 PM
b0yg0tskills
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
2
02-24-2007 04:53 AM
eymnewdc4
Acura Integra
8
12-18-2004 09:35 PM
Bman
Acura Integra
4
03-24-2003 11:53 AM



Quick Reply: Turbo vs N/A



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 AM.