taking the fast idle valve off
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (funkfnamna)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by funkfnamna »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">will this effect how the engine runs????</TD></TR></TABLE>
It probably will, unless Honda/Acura felt the need to include parts that don't do **** for the engine except raise its cost.
The FITV is there to help out the cold idle - if you remove it, or 'fix' it (which disables it), then you won't have the functionality it once was providing.
It probably will, unless Honda/Acura felt the need to include parts that don't do **** for the engine except raise its cost.
The FITV is there to help out the cold idle - if you remove it, or 'fix' it (which disables it), then you won't have the functionality it once was providing.
#4
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: running nines, but on two wheels
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (civictildeath)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by civictildeath »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">think it will take longer for engine to warm up</TD></TR></TABLE>
I definitely have to agree with this statement, but other than that, I have had no problems having my FIT valve blocked off. Don't get me wrong, it's a "remove at your own risk" situation, and different people have different results. I have had no ill effects though.
-Shane
I definitely have to agree with this statement, but other than that, I have had no problems having my FIT valve blocked off. Don't get me wrong, it's a "remove at your own risk" situation, and different people have different results. I have had no ill effects though.
-Shane
#6
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: running nines, but on two wheels
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (monicle)
My car idles just fine. about 1500 (maybe a little less) for the first couple minutes while warming up. Once it starts warming up it drops to about 650-700. But like I said before, it takes about 10 minutes to warm up (45 deg. weather) if it just sits there (I don't drive it).
-Shane
-Shane
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Londonderry, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (nighttrain33)
well I have a bbk t/b on one of my other cars and it comes with a block off plate so you can either run it or not, and I'm finishing reassembling my turbo crx and I broke one of the fittings of the fitv, so i was just going to pull it off
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (funkfnamna)
If your car idles high all the time after removing the FITV, something is wrong. Did you seal it off properly?
With the FITV my warm up idle was up past 1500. That was a little dangerous and annoying. After I bypassed/removed/blocked off the FITV, warm up takes a little longer but the high idle is at 1100 and drops to normal idle after I drive the car a bit. About the same as every other car I've driven. No loping or anything as some people who do the bypass incorrectly complain. Seriously, start your car, wait 15 seconds, then drive it easy until it reaches OT. Once your car is moving, FITV is irrelevant. It only warms up your car faster than it would w/out it if you sit at idle for most of the time your car is warming up.
Honda put it there to warm up the car faster and to thaw the throttle plate in freezing climates. I don't know why people always revert to the argument, if Honda put it there, you need it there. Honda put the stock exhaust and intake on there, remember? Honda put those 13 inch wheels you have stacked in your garage, with that shitty ***, what, Michelin? on them.
With the FITV my warm up idle was up past 1500. That was a little dangerous and annoying. After I bypassed/removed/blocked off the FITV, warm up takes a little longer but the high idle is at 1100 and drops to normal idle after I drive the car a bit. About the same as every other car I've driven. No loping or anything as some people who do the bypass incorrectly complain. Seriously, start your car, wait 15 seconds, then drive it easy until it reaches OT. Once your car is moving, FITV is irrelevant. It only warms up your car faster than it would w/out it if you sit at idle for most of the time your car is warming up.
Honda put it there to warm up the car faster and to thaw the throttle plate in freezing climates. I don't know why people always revert to the argument, if Honda put it there, you need it there. Honda put the stock exhaust and intake on there, remember? Honda put those 13 inch wheels you have stacked in your garage, with that shitty ***, what, Michelin? on them.
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (shaundrake)
scroll to the bottom of page 2 of this thread for diagrams of a proper FITV bypass.
http://www.civichatchback.com/...ber=2
http://www.civichatchback.com/...ber=2
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Londonderry, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (shaundrake)
well I live in new engalnd so I guess I really should fix it, but thanks for the info.
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pewaukee, WI, USA
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (funkfnamna)
Mine has 2 ports on it. Is one a coolant in and the other a coolant out? I just did a swap and I am leaking coolant from that line. im almost positive my lines aren't set up correctly.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Londonderry, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (GWInquisitor14)
one should be coming from the thermostat housing or the intake manifold, going to the FITV, the to the IACV the then to the metal water hose beneith the IM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pewaukee, WI, USA
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (funkfnamna)
the way i have it setup right now is one goes from the thermostat housing to it and the other goes from it to the intake manifold. The IACV has one going from a pipe by the block to it and then another going from it to the throttle body.
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Londonderry, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: taking the fast idle valve off (GWInquisitor14)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GWInquisitor14 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">is this correct?</TD></TR></TABLE>
what is your setup? it sounds correct
what is your setup? it sounds correct
#18
I have my FITV blocked off and my car drives just fine. It does have a rough idle when the car is cold, but otherwise when the car warms up it is pretty much perfect.
-Lor
-Lor
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Londonderry, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (turboimports)
What gen b16 manifold? either way you should have one running from the metal hose on the back og the block that comes from the water pump to the IACV then to the FITV then to the thermostat housing or the intake manifold. It all depends on year and model.... I live up here in the northeast so FITV are a must. sitting in your car trying to warm it up when its -10 sucks.
#21
Re: (funkfnamna)
i bypassed my FITV and my idle is really really low when i first start it up and then after it warms up it only goes to about 400rpm and when i mess with the idle screw and cable it still wont turn it up. its really weird. i also have an engine light on for IACV as well but ive gone through just about every process thinkable to try and fix it. i have a thread on it if you search my name you can find it (if interested). im probably gonna end up takin my car to a shop and have them test the wires in my wiring harness.
#22
Re: (Chris M)
Are you sure its 400rpm's? Because the gage only reads from 500rpm's and up. One sure way of raising your rpm is by turning the little bolt on the throttle body by the throttle cable with an alen wrench. Unlike the idle screw, this will raise the idle for sure.
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Londonderry, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ek99)
yeah but he still has a check engine light. I would test the IACV circuit and the valve. heres a good writeup on idle problems
http://www.ef-honda.com/ben/Badidle.html
http://www.ef-honda.com/ben/Badidle.html
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pewaukee, WI, USA
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ek99)
If i remember correctly, the manifold and TB are off a 91 JDM B16a1. The FITV is mounted on the bottom of the intake manifold. I have one coolant line going from the black line on the back of the block to the IACV then one from the IACV to a nipple on TB and then one going from another nipple on the TB to the FITV. I came to an educated guess/conclusion that the two nipples on the throttle body were a easy way to run lines around the intake pipe, so thats why they are there. Then another going from the FITV to the small nipple on the intake manifold. Then another (probably irrelivant) going from the thermostat housing to a metal bypass line to a nipple by the upper radiator hose.
#25
Re: (funkfnamna)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by funkfnamna »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah but he still has a check engine light. I would test the IACV circuit and the valve. heres a good writeup on idle problems
http://www.ef-honda.com/ben/Badidle.html</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah i used that site in the past though. it is a good site, but didnt fix my problem
http://www.ef-honda.com/ben/Badidle.html</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah i used that site in the past though. it is a good site, but didnt fix my problem