Spoon stroker kit for b16
07-28-2007, 07:38 AM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spoon stroker kit for b16
Has anyone ever used the spoon stroker kit? Just wondering if its worth the money?
Heres the link to check it out.
http://www.spoonsports.us/cata....htm
Heres the link to check it out.
http://www.spoonsports.us/cata....htm
07-28-2007, 10:34 AM
#6
Go Tigers!
Re: (JDMjoe86)
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1910414
It is only for the b16b. The CTR engine uses a GSR block, b16 crank with longer rods. This cannot be used in a b16a.
It is only for the b16b. The CTR engine uses a GSR block, b16 crank with longer rods. This cannot be used in a b16a.
07-28-2007, 10:39 AM
#7
Ek Forever y0!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beating people with a stick, GA
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: (Bense)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It is only for the b16b. The CTR engine uses a GSR block, b16 crank with longer rods. This cannot be used in a b16a.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Correct, a destroked b18. Not a magic b16a.
Correct, a destroked b18. Not a magic b16a.
Trending Topics
07-28-2007, 10:43 AM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Bense)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1910414
It is only for the b16b. The CTR engine uses a GSR block, b16 crank with longer rods. This cannot be used in a b16a.</TD></TR></TABLE>
So no point unless you have a CTR
It is only for the b16b. The CTR engine uses a GSR block, b16 crank with longer rods. This cannot be used in a b16a.</TD></TR></TABLE>
So no point unless you have a CTR
07-28-2007, 10:45 AM
#9
Ek Forever y0!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beating people with a stick, GA
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: (JDMjoe86)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMjoe86 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So no point unless you have a CTR</TD></TR></TABLE>
Exactly. Though why you'd pick a 1.6L for an n/a platform is beyond me.
Exactly. Though why you'd pick a 1.6L for an n/a platform is beyond me.
07-28-2007, 10:58 AM
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ek forever guy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Exactly. Though why you'd pick a 1.6L for an n/a platform is beyond me.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why so?... b18c1 a better choice?
Exactly. Though why you'd pick a 1.6L for an n/a platform is beyond me.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why so?... b18c1 a better choice?
07-28-2007, 11:20 AM
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: LEISURE RULES
Posts: 8,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Spoon stroker kit for b16 (JDMjoe86)
spoon stroker kits are made for B16B motors. price of a B16B+spoon stoker kit+labor you might as well buy a 98 spec JDM ITR swap.
07-28-2007, 11:22 AM
#12
Ek Forever y0!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beating people with a stick, GA
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: Spoon stroker kit for b16 (eg6sir-s)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMjoe86 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Why so?... b18c1 a better choice?</TD></TR></TABLE>
We're considered retarded for making small displacement cars fast in the first place, why would you shoot yourself in the foot by using the smallest displacement dohc vtec there is.
More displacement = more torque, more power, more potential, and more gains per liter for every mod you do.
Why so?... b18c1 a better choice?</TD></TR></TABLE>
We're considered retarded for making small displacement cars fast in the first place, why would you shoot yourself in the foot by using the smallest displacement dohc vtec there is.
More displacement = more torque, more power, more potential, and more gains per liter for every mod you do.
07-28-2007, 11:23 AM
#14
Ek Forever y0!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beating people with a stick, GA
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: (Bense)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lets not turn this into a b vs h series argument plz</TD></TR></TABLE>
Just saying that a b18 would be a better choice. I understand your sentiments, I wasn't even going to mention the H.
Just saying that a b18 would be a better choice. I understand your sentiments, I wasn't even going to mention the H.
07-28-2007, 11:31 AM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ek forever guy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Just saying that a b18 would be a better choice. I understand your sentiments, I wasn't even going to mention the H.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Doesn't h swap have terrible oversteer b/c of the position of the mount.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
We're considered retarded for making small displacement cars fast in the first place, why would you shoot yourself in the foot by using the smallest displacement dohc vtec there is.
More displacement = more torque, more power, more potential, and more gains per liter for every mod you do.</TD></TR></TABLE>
But what about the b16a, same hp as b18c5 less displacement, granted that b16a is a little different from normal b16 right. enlighten me if im wrong.
Just saying that a b18 would be a better choice. I understand your sentiments, I wasn't even going to mention the H.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Doesn't h swap have terrible oversteer b/c of the position of the mount.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
We're considered retarded for making small displacement cars fast in the first place, why would you shoot yourself in the foot by using the smallest displacement dohc vtec there is.
More displacement = more torque, more power, more potential, and more gains per liter for every mod you do.</TD></TR></TABLE>
But what about the b16a, same hp as b18c5 less displacement, granted that b16a is a little different from normal b16 right. enlighten me if im wrong.
07-28-2007, 11:46 AM
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (JDMjoe86)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMjoe86 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
But what about the b16a, same hp as b18c5 less displacement, granted that b16a is a little different from normal b16 right. enlighten me if im wrong.</TD></TR></TABLE>
no the b16a does not have the same HP as the b18c5. the b18c5 is an itr motor (200hp).
the b16a does have the same hp output as the b18c1, which is a gsr (170hp). the b18c1 has a higher torque outout over the b16 due to it's discplacment.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
why would you shoot yourself in the foot by using the smallest displacement dohc vtec there is.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
maybe because they are alittle cheaper than the 1.8. the b16 is not a bad platform to start out with. it's only problem is it's alittle shorter than it's brothers, but who cares, it's a great vtec motor to turbo!
But what about the b16a, same hp as b18c5 less displacement, granted that b16a is a little different from normal b16 right. enlighten me if im wrong.</TD></TR></TABLE>
no the b16a does not have the same HP as the b18c5. the b18c5 is an itr motor (200hp).
the b16a does have the same hp output as the b18c1, which is a gsr (170hp). the b18c1 has a higher torque outout over the b16 due to it's discplacment.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
why would you shoot yourself in the foot by using the smallest displacement dohc vtec there is.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
maybe because they are alittle cheaper than the 1.8. the b16 is not a bad platform to start out with. it's only problem is it's alittle shorter than it's brothers, but who cares, it's a great vtec motor to turbo!
07-28-2007, 11:53 AM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (philosofy1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by philosofy1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
no the b16a does not have the same HP as the b18c5. the b18c5 is an itr motor (200hp).
the b16a does have the same hp output as the b18c1, which is a gsr (170hp). the b18c1 has a higher torque outout over the b16 due to it's discplacment.
maybe because they are alittle cheaper than the 1.8. the b16 is not a bad platform to start out with. it's only problem is it's alittle shorter than it's brothers, but who cares, it's a great vtec motor to turbo!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Correct me if im wrong, but i thought the b16a was a ctr motor, 200hp...
No turbo for me, NA all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!
no the b16a does not have the same HP as the b18c5. the b18c5 is an itr motor (200hp).
the b16a does have the same hp output as the b18c1, which is a gsr (170hp). the b18c1 has a higher torque outout over the b16 due to it's discplacment.
maybe because they are alittle cheaper than the 1.8. the b16 is not a bad platform to start out with. it's only problem is it's alittle shorter than it's brothers, but who cares, it's a great vtec motor to turbo!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Correct me if im wrong, but i thought the b16a was a ctr motor, 200hp...
No turbo for me, NA all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!
07-28-2007, 11:57 AM
#20
Ek Forever y0!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beating people with a stick, GA
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: (JDMjoe86)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMjoe86 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Correct me if im wrong, but i thought the b16a was a ctr motor, 200hp...
No turbo for me, NA all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
No,
B16A
Note: All j.d.m. B16A engines are stamped 'B16A' (with no number after the "A" to identify version).
* VTEC
* Found in:
o 1989-1993 JDM Honda Integra RSi/XSi (DA6/DA8)
o 1989-1991 JDM Honda CRX SiR (EF8)
o 1989-1991 JDM Honda Civic SiR/SiRII (EF9)
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.2:1
+ Rod/stroke ratio: 1.74
+ Power: 158 hp @ 7600 rpm & 112 ft·lbf @ 7000 rpm
+ Transmission: S1/J1/Y1/A1/YS1
o 1992-1995 JDM Honda Civic SiR/SiRII (EG6/EG9)
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.4:1
+ Power: 168 hp @ 8800 rpm & 116 ft·lbf @ 7300 rpm
+ Transmission: S4C
o 1992-1995 EDM Honda Civic VTi
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.4:1
+ Power: 158 hp @ 7600 rpm & 116 ft·lbf @ 7300 rpm
o 1992-1996 JDM Honda CR-X del Sol SiR
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.4:1
+ Power: 158 hp - 170 hp & 111 ft·lbf - 116 ft·lbf
B16B
* VTEC
* Found in:
o 1997-2000 Civic Type-R[EK9]
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.8:1
+ Bore: 81mm
+ Stroke: 77mm
+ Power: 185 hp (137 kW) @ 8200 rpm & 118 ft·lbf (160 N·m) @ 7500 rpm
+ Transmission: S4C With LSD
And those numbers are all at 9 billion rpms.
Correct me if im wrong, but i thought the b16a was a ctr motor, 200hp...
No turbo for me, NA all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
No,
B16A
Note: All j.d.m. B16A engines are stamped 'B16A' (with no number after the "A" to identify version).
* VTEC
* Found in:
o 1989-1993 JDM Honda Integra RSi/XSi (DA6/DA8)
o 1989-1991 JDM Honda CRX SiR (EF8)
o 1989-1991 JDM Honda Civic SiR/SiRII (EF9)
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.2:1
+ Rod/stroke ratio: 1.74
+ Power: 158 hp @ 7600 rpm & 112 ft·lbf @ 7000 rpm
+ Transmission: S1/J1/Y1/A1/YS1
o 1992-1995 JDM Honda Civic SiR/SiRII (EG6/EG9)
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.4:1
+ Power: 168 hp @ 8800 rpm & 116 ft·lbf @ 7300 rpm
+ Transmission: S4C
o 1992-1995 EDM Honda Civic VTi
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.4:1
+ Power: 158 hp @ 7600 rpm & 116 ft·lbf @ 7300 rpm
o 1992-1996 JDM Honda CR-X del Sol SiR
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.4:1
+ Power: 158 hp - 170 hp & 111 ft·lbf - 116 ft·lbf
B16B
* VTEC
* Found in:
o 1997-2000 Civic Type-R[EK9]
+ Displacement: 1595 cm³
+ Compression: 10.8:1
+ Bore: 81mm
+ Stroke: 77mm
+ Power: 185 hp (137 kW) @ 8200 rpm & 118 ft·lbf (160 N·m) @ 7500 rpm
+ Transmission: S4C With LSD
And those numbers are all at 9 billion rpms.
07-28-2007, 12:02 PM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Bense)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so what's better?
4.9 final in b16b or b18c with 4.4 final?
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2049181</TD></TR></TABLE>
the b18 is better than the b16 of coarse. all i stated was it wasn't a bad platform as many people claim it to be.
and i don't think a stoker kit is worth it, there are other ways to reach higher HP, without having to re-stroke a b16.
4.9 final in b16b or b18c with 4.4 final?
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2049181</TD></TR></TABLE>
the b18 is better than the b16 of coarse. all i stated was it wasn't a bad platform as many people claim it to be.
and i don't think a stoker kit is worth it, there are other ways to reach higher HP, without having to re-stroke a b16.
07-28-2007, 12:31 PM
#23
Go Tigers!
Re: (philosofy1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by philosofy1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the b18 is better than the b16 of coarse.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Increase the amount of air moved per instance?
Or increase the frequency of instances?
Increase the amount of air moved per instance?
Or increase the frequency of instances?
07-28-2007, 12:37 PM
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Bense)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Increase the amount of air moved per instance?
Or increase the frequency of instances?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
?
are you trying to teach me something?
Increase the amount of air moved per instance?
Or increase the frequency of instances?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
?
are you trying to teach me something?
07-28-2007, 12:39 PM
#25
Ek Forever y0!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beating people with a stick, GA
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: (philosofy1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Increase the amount of air moved per instance?
Or increase the frequency of instances?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would think the difference in frequency is small enough that increasing the air moved per instance would make a more positive gain.
Increase the amount of air moved per instance?
Or increase the frequency of instances?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would think the difference in frequency is small enough that increasing the air moved per instance would make a more positive gain.