rear lower tranny mount: same on 94-01 teg as 92-95 civics?
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Scranton, PA, us
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rear lower tranny mount: same on 94-01 teg as 92-95 civics?
rear lower tranny mount: same on 94-01 teg as 92-95 civics? i need a new one and can get a teg one cheaper. im 99.9% sure they are the same. just talking about the mount, not the bracket.
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Re: rear lower tranny mount: same on 94-01 teg as 92-95 civics? (drewthomas14)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by drewthomas14 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">rear lower tranny mount: same on 94-01 teg as 92-95 civics? i need a new one and can get a teg one cheaper. im 99.9% sure they are the same. just talking about the mount, not the bracket.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The rubber mount or the bracket that bolts to the transmission? If the rubber mount, yes, it is the same.
The rubber mount or the bracket that bolts to the transmission? If the rubber mount, yes, it is the same.
#3
Former Moderator
Re: rear lower tranny mount: same on 94-01 teg as 92-95 civics? (Turbogixxer)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Turbogixxer »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The rubber mount or the bracket that bolts to the transmission? If the rubber mount, yes, it is the same.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Echo/ditto/roger that.
The rubber mount or the bracket that bolts to the transmission? If the rubber mount, yes, it is the same.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Echo/ditto/roger that.
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Scranton, PA, us
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: rear lower tranny mount: same on 94-01 teg as 92-95 civics? (B18C5-EH2)
thanks fella's. yes, im just talking about the rubber.
end thread\
end thread\
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
v-tec maz
Acura Integra
3
01-23-2006 07:06 PM
Combustion Contraption
For Sale
2
09-29-2003 09:15 AM