Notices
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

R U happy with your skunk 2 intake manifold?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2004, 06:10 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
jdmjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Savannah, GA, United States
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default R U happy with your skunk 2 intake manifold?

im getting a skunk 2 intake manifold for my gsr eh2! If you have one on your car then give me some feedback on it... i want to know what kinda power gain/loss i will be expecting! THANKS
Old 12-31-2004, 06:03 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
JohnnysEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: R U happy with your skunk 2 intake manifold? (jdmjeff)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmjeff &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im getting a skunk 2 intake manifold for my gsr eh2! If you have one on your car then give me some feedback on it... i want to know what kinda power gain/loss i will be expecting! THANKS</TD></TR></TABLE>

I could tell a big difference after i put mine on........no dyno charts to prove exact power, but made really good power from mid-range to top end power from what it felt like anyway.........

I'm pretty sure to that after you put the mani on it makes the gezzer a lil rich........but i have always heard good things about the SK2 manifold.

Hope you get that distributor problem to get that fixed soon to.......

TTT
Old 01-01-2005, 07:17 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
aznsins88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Madison, Florida, China
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

instead of getting the skunk 2 im, get the itr im. I heard that they were the same and skunk 2 im are knock off of itr ones. Iunno but thats just IMO
Old 01-01-2005, 07:24 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
hayabusa160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: nj
Posts: 4,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (aznsins88)

type r manifold dont fit gsr heads.
Old 01-01-2005, 07:42 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
JohnnysEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (hayabusa160)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hayabusa160 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">type r manifold dont fit gsr heads. </TD></TR></TABLE>


beat me to it..............
Old 01-01-2005, 08:28 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rodrez.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: King Tubbys studio, CA
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (aznsins88)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmjeff &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im getting a skunk 2 intake manifold for my gsr eh2! If you have one on your car then give me some feedback on it... i want to know what kinda power gain/loss i will be expecting! THANKS</TD></TR></TABLE>

I liked mine when I used one, but I cleaned it up a little bit, as the runners were very rough, and I took a little off the bottom of the intake ports on the head in order to help match it up a little better. The Skunk manifold, being a copy of the ITR, doesn't match the GSR heads flowpath directly, it's angled a bit different.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aznsins88 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">instead of getting the skunk 2 im, get the itr im. I heard that they were the same and skunk 2 im are knock off of itr ones. Iunno but thats just IMO</TD></TR></TABLE>

Even if the ITR manifold did fit, the knock off would do the same job.
Old 01-01-2005, 08:30 PM
  #7  
Trial User
 
The Specialist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Po0rmona, Ca
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (rodrez.)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I liked mine when I used one, but I cleaned it up a little bit, as the runners were very rough, and I took a little off the bottom of the intake ports on the head in order to help match it up a little better. The Skunk manifold, being a copy of the ITR, doesn't match the GSR heads flowpath directly, it's angled a bit different.

Even if the ITR manifold did fit, the knock off would do the same job. </TD></TR></TABLE>


Ya, I just decided to stick with ITR Same thing but less expensive
Old 01-01-2005, 08:40 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
CA6VTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: nYc
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (racer_x_eg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by racer_x_eg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


Ya, I just decided to stick with ITR Same thing but less expensive</TD></TR></TABLE>

<FONT COLOR="royalblue"> ITR Intake manifold is not a direct fit on the GS-R head.

After installing my S2 IM, I lost a decent amount of low end torque, but the gains on High end were pretty damm good. I felt a change around 4.5 + till red line.
</FONT>
Old 01-01-2005, 08:43 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
stockegsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles CA, Houston TX
Posts: 4,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (CA6VTEC)

yes i like mine a lot!!!! made a bigger difference when I added CTR cams & p28
Old 01-01-2005, 08:46 PM
  #10  
Trial User
 
The Specialist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Po0rmona, Ca
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (CA6VTEC)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CA6VTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

<FONT COLOR="royalblue"> ITR Intake manifold is not a direct fit on the GS-R head.

After installing my S2 IM, I lost a decent amount of low end torque, but the gains on High end were pretty damm good. I felt a change around 4.5 + till red line.
</FONT></TD></TR></TABLE>

I know that. I was just comparing the pro's and con's of the two manifolds
Old 01-13-2005, 12:42 PM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Try2Live4God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (racer_x_eg)

Is there a manifold out there that is decent but does not lose power in the low end but still get's good gains at the high end?
Old 01-13-2005, 12:46 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Lee_Delso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Up north, usa
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Try2Live4God)

How about the AEBS one, alot cheaper than Skunk 2 and ITR?
Old 01-13-2005, 01:10 PM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
dornon13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Lee_Delso)

I got this book for christmas and they tested a delsol manifold against the skunk 2 manifold as well as others and the del sol either outperfomed it or performed less than 1hp less. i believe the test was on a GSR engine too ...ill check but if i dont post differently assume it was GSR but i guess you might wanna look into the power band of the diff. manifolds too
Old 01-13-2005, 01:22 PM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
BDogggUT34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not to hijack the thread but does anyone have opinions on the BLOX IM?
Old 01-13-2005, 01:27 PM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Go_Fork_Urself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dirty Jurzee
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Lee_Delso)

AEBS does not have Manifolds for GSR's only B16 and B18c5
The Skunk 2 Manifold is basicly the ITR manifold bored out
Old 01-13-2005, 01:56 PM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rodrez.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: King Tubbys studio, CA
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (BDogggUT34)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BDogggUT34 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not to hijack the thread but does anyone have opinions on the BLOX IM?</TD></TR></TABLE>

It's the same thing as the Skunk2.
Old 01-13-2005, 02:31 PM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rusted_eyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: At The Bottom Of A Bottle, AZ, USA
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: R U happy with your skunk 2 intake manifold? (jdmjeff)

I got one on my B16 feels great up top, but it also feels like it lost some on the low end. Hopefully it'll feel even better when I get my cams and valvetrain upgraded.

Old 01-13-2005, 03:57 PM
  #18  
 
NeverEverSatisfied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chesterton, IN, USA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: R U happy with your skunk 2 intake manifold? (jdmjeff)

I like.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
96accordsir
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
6
08-02-2009 07:57 PM
Gurlieluder69
Honda Prelude
22
11-07-2007 08:38 PM
the soL that could
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
2
04-15-2006 01:19 AM
Home Wrecker
Forced Induction
12
02-23-2006 10:13 AM
sloweredcivic
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
8
02-08-2005 07:17 PM



Quick Reply: R U happy with your skunk 2 intake manifold?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:06 PM.