r/s ratio on a b20
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: r/s ratio on a b20 (davken1102)
The ideal R/S is 1.75:1,
B16A:
Rod length: 134 mm
Stroke: 77 mm
R/S: 1.74:1
Displacement: 1587.12 cc
B17A:
rod length: 131.87 mm
Stroke: 81.4 mm
R/S: 1.62:1
Displacement: 1677.81 cc
B18A-B:
Rod length: 137mm
Stroke: 89mm
R/S: 1.54:1
Displacement: 1834.47 cc
B18C:
Rod length: 137.9 mm
Stroke: 87.2 mm
R/S: 1.58:1
Displacement: 1797.36 cc
B20A (Older Prelude Si)
Rod length: 141.7-142.75 mm
Stroke: 95 mm
R/S: 1.49-1.50:1
Displacement: 1958.14-2056.03 cc
B16A:
Rod length: 134 mm
Stroke: 77 mm
R/S: 1.74:1
Displacement: 1587.12 cc
B17A:
rod length: 131.87 mm
Stroke: 81.4 mm
R/S: 1.62:1
Displacement: 1677.81 cc
B18A-B:
Rod length: 137mm
Stroke: 89mm
R/S: 1.54:1
Displacement: 1834.47 cc
B18C:
Rod length: 137.9 mm
Stroke: 87.2 mm
R/S: 1.58:1
Displacement: 1797.36 cc
B20A (Older Prelude Si)
Rod length: 141.7-142.75 mm
Stroke: 95 mm
R/S: 1.49-1.50:1
Displacement: 1958.14-2056.03 cc
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: r/s ratio on a b20 (slammed_93_hatch)
yea, i knew the ideal ratio was 1.75:1 but i really doubted that a b20 block out of a CR-V would be close to that but 1.54 is pretty far off so you wouldnt be able to rev it up very high. which sucks
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post