Notices
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2012, 10:35 AM
  #151  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Originally Posted by jbpnoman
I almost got excited because I thought you might be able to help me source one

The double plenum manifold is just a thought I occasionally toss around in my head for a ITB/turbo build. Instead of just having one inlet for the charge piping, run two diametrically opposed, allowing for more even airflow into the ITBs. Mathematically, that more even airflow would allow for better throttle response, but it would be one of those things that even the best drivers in the world could never feel.

I just think it would look as **** under the hood.
I literally vomited words all over this response debating with myself the benefits of what you proposed and then promptly deleted the response because I can't remember enough from my fluid dynamics course I took... 7 years ago now. I don't want to say something stupid.

I'm pretty sure with what you've proposed, you'd end up with a slightly higher volumetric flow rate due to the decrease in frictional losses in piping but the velocity of the flow will be greatly reduced. I'm just wondering if the valve opening event will be of too short a duration to allow for a sufficient quantity of the slower moving air to enter cylinder. I'm sure there's got to be a relation between pipe size and potential power that's somewhat parabolic. There are gains to a certain point that will depend upon the turbo's ability to supply air. All motor cars have cams that stay open for longer to allow the slower moving air sufficient time to enter the cylinder. The valve opening events overlap more to take advantage of the momentum of the exhaust gases to create a vacuum in the cylinders and suck more intake air in. That's how they can get away with using ITBs. Long duration cams aren't good for turbo/sc cars because our charges typically have a higher velocity. We'll blow our charge right out the cylinder with long duration cams.
Old 11-19-2012, 10:37 AM
  #152  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Orbo^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Nice build man!
Old 11-19-2012, 11:02 AM
  #153  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Question ---> ANSWER

So, my B18C1 has the OEM oil cooler (not numbered in the picture, below but it's what hoses 2 and 3 connect to)



Reading the C-Speed Racing Install Guide, I can clock the Oil Cooler from the 12 o'clock position to the 9 o'clock position. http://www.c-speedr.com/howto/jrsc/jrsc3.php

But, what if I want to use the hex plug location on the driver side of oil filter to connect my catch can? (shown in the left corner of the picture, below [stolen from Gooch's-JDM B18C w/ JRSC+LHT build/issue thread]). I was hoping to use both plugs.



Has anyone done this? Did you bend the oil cooler neck or did the plug for the catch can hose connection fit?

Oil cooler line connection: HERE

Last edited by CX-Adam; 11-20-2012 at 06:23 PM. Reason: Linking to Answer
Old 11-19-2012, 11:04 AM
  #154  
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
jbpnoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Originally Posted by CX-Adam
I literally vomited words all over this response debating with myself the benefits of what you proposed and then promptly deleted the response because I can't remember enough from my fluid dynamics course I took... 7 years ago now. I don't want to say something stupid.
Spent a couple years in an Aerospace Engineering degree program about 5 years ago, so I'm pretty much on the same level. Just enough to have crazy ideas, not enough full remembered knowledge to be sure it'll work

Originally Posted by CX-Adam
I'm pretty sure with what you've proposed, you'd end up with a slightly higher volumetric flow rate due to the decrease in frictional losses in piping but the velocity of the flow will be greatly reduced. I'm just wondering if the valve opening event will be of too short a duration to allow for a sufficient quantity of the slower moving air to enter cylinder. I'm sure there's got to be a relation between pipe size and potential power that's somewhat parabolic. There are gains to a certain point that will depend upon the turbo's ability to supply air. All motor cars have cams that stay open for longer to allow the slower moving air sufficient time to enter the cylinder. The valve opening events overlap more to take advantage of the momentum of the exhaust gases to create a vacuum in the cylinders and suck more intake air in. That's how they can get away with using ITBs. Long duration cams aren't good for turbo/sc cars because our charges typically have a higher velocity. We'll blow our charge right out the cylinder with long duration cams.
Velocity can easily be addressed by running smaller piping, and a smaller manifold. Also partially helped by the fact that the single turbo would be something big, like a T70, running a single charge pipe into the intercooler, where it gets split into two smaller pipes. Bernoulli's Principle says higher pressure = higher velocity. If enough money is being put into a motor to do this kind of crazy-level ****, chances are the motor is built enough to handle the pressure needed to make it all work.

I hadn't thought about the cams involved. There's so much interesting **** that would make this possible, if I could just find one of my old professor's e-mail addresses to throw ideas at him.
Old 11-19-2012, 11:38 AM
  #155  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Originally Posted by jbpnoman
Spent a couple years in an Aerospace Engineering degree program about 5 years ago, so I'm pretty much on the same level. Just enough to have crazy ideas, not enough full remembered knowledge to be sure it'll work
4.5 in a Mechanical with Formula SAE as my Senior Design Project + 4 years of Fire Protection Engineering. But, everything I do at work I learned "reading" Where's Waldo books.

Originally Posted by jbpnoman
Velocity can easily be addressed by running smaller piping, and a smaller manifold.
But, you'll be reducing you're volumetric flow rate with smaller tubing. A lot of testing would be required to determine the optimum pipe sizes. Also, directional changes in piping reduce flow efficiency. Therefore, two different pipes with an unequal number of bends would have different losses. Albeit minimal. Nothing a tune couldn't take care of. But, then you'd need to MAP sensors, right? Custom ECU?

Originally Posted by jbpnoman
Also partially helped by the fact that the single turbo would be something big, like a T70, running a single charge pipe into the intercooler, where it gets split into two smaller pipes. Bernoulli's Principle says higher pressure = higher velocity.
Correct. pressure is equal to the square of velocity divided by the kinematic viscosity. However, Velocity is equal to the Volumetric flow rate divided by the cross sectional area of the piping. Q = VA where Q is in cubic feet per min, V is in feet per minute, and A is in square feet. Bernoulli's principle takes into account other factors than just velocity pressure. There's also head loss due to elevation change, frictional losses, and the normal (static) pressure at a point or measurement.

Too much to think about. It's obviously been done before on twin turbo V-6 through V-12 cars but it's complicated. You should go for it! I'm having enough trouble with this build and it's already been done before.
Old 11-19-2012, 11:46 AM
  #156  
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
jbpnoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charlottesville, VA, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Hey, if I ever make it work, I'll send you a kit and we can figure it all out together Just a pipe dream for now, though.
Old 11-19-2012, 04:20 PM
  #157  
Honda-Tech Member
 
salemned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Car looks great man good luck with it hope it all goes well
Old 11-20-2012, 04:14 AM
  #158  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Last night I installed the water pump, the AEM Cam Gears, and the other JRSC brackets.


This is great because I'm finding all sorts of stuff I need like: Oil pump, Oil pick-up gasket, O-Ring for water line, Cam Seals, Water Pump Gasket, and the 2" idler pulley for the JRSC. Mocking the engine build will allow me to continue to compile this list and save a boat load on shipping costs.

Still no answer to my question posted in #153.
Old 11-20-2012, 06:57 AM
  #159  
Honda-Tech Member
 
vgsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Car looks great! I can't believe how much work you've put into saving it, very impressive! Now I just wish I knew someone as good at bodywork as your dad...
Old 11-20-2012, 02:41 PM
  #160  
R.I.P. Mark
iTrader: (1)
 
MRGRIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Originally Posted by CX-Adam
Last night I installed the water pump, the AEM Cam Gears, and the other JRSC brackets.


This is great because I'm finding all sorts of stuff I need like: Oil pump, Oil pick-up gasket, O-Ring for water line, Cam Seals, Water Pump Gasket, and the 2" idler pulley for the JRSC. Mocking the engine build will allow me to continue to compile this list and save a boat load on shipping costs.

Still no answer to my question posted in #153.
slow help reply as im being lazy on holidays

ok 1st in the pic where you have the ALT is wrong it mounts almost hard against the block
yes i know it looks good there but dont work for 2 reasons "bay clearance" hits subframe
"belt to long causing belt flap/harmoic's"
have a look at the install instructions for integra type r
if you dont have a copy pm me your email its missing from Veris FLT site
Ill get him to update the list when he has time

2nd your unanswered question .. as you know i run a B16B @above10psi same setup as you just diffrent internals..
Im using a catch can with 2 inputs 1 output "no drain back"
inputs valve cover + hose from black breather box
output to intake tube similar to stock
reason .. a little oil vapor that get past the gause stainless filter doesnt hurt

with regard to your question .. you can get a replacement bung that fills the hole the black
box goes into that has a barb / AN fitting on it to use as a vent point, cant remmber the brand

3rd question oil cooler hose connections
please look at page 657 on JRSC thread there is a pic with explanation posts

hope all the long read is helpful

Cheers
MrGrim
Old 11-20-2012, 06:19 PM
  #161  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Thanks so much for the reply MRGRIM. I'm in no rush. I've got until spring!

Originally Posted by MRGRIM
ok 1st in the pic where you have the ALT is wrong it mounts almost hard against the block
yes i know it looks good there but dont work for 2 reasons "bay clearance" hits subframe
"belt to long causing belt flap/harmoic's"
have a look at the install instructions for integra type r
if you dont have a copy pm me your email its missing from Veris FLT site
Ill get him to update the list when he has time
Oh wow. I didn't notice that. Veris has both the GSR and ITR hosted but thanks for the offer. I had a printed out copy of the GSR instructions when I was putting it all together but I obviously wasn't following them closely enough. I'm mainly checking that I have all the parts. Still, good catch!

ITR: http://ftlracing.com/instructions/Ty...structions.pdf
GSR: http://ftlracing.com/instructions/gsr_instructions.pdf

Originally Posted by MRGRIM

2nd your unanswered question .. as you know i run a B16B @above10psi same setup as you just diffrent internals..
Im using a catch can with 2 inputs 1 output "no drain back"
inputs valve cover + hose from black breather box
output to intake tube similar to stock
reason .. a little oil vapor that get past the gause stainless filter doesnt hurt

with regard to your question .. you can get a replacement bung that fills the hole the black
box goes into that has a barb / AN fitting on it to use as a vent point, cant remmber the brand
Ok, I figured that'd be the response I'd get. I did read your post about your setup. Not sure why I decided to waste the collective time of our fellow Honda-Tech members with the question. Thanks for the reply though. I know you get a lot of these questions...

Originally Posted by MRGRIM
3rd question oil cooler hose connections
please look at page 657 on JRSC thread there is a pic with explanation posts
Thanks, already saw that! It's also described in the GSR installation instructions that Veris has hosted.

Originally Posted by MRGRIM
hope all the long read is helpful

Very. Thanks! Happy holidays to you as well.
Old 11-20-2012, 06:30 PM
  #162  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Hatchback_Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pasco Wa
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Great work man. I dont have any cancer on my hatch but hopefully it comes out looking as clean as urs.
Old 11-20-2012, 06:33 PM
  #163  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Originally Posted by Hatchback_Pat
Great work man. I dont have any cancer on my hatch but hopefully it comes out looking as clean as urs.
Thanks! Water sanding and buffing makes a HUGE difference after a fresh paint job. I didn't believe it until I saw it. It's well worth the day or two it takes to do.
Old 11-21-2012, 03:49 AM
  #164  
R.I.P. Mark
iTrader: (1)
 
MRGRIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

glad to help you
and re the instructions
Veris posted it up on his site befotre you got to it ..LOL
as i emailed him a copy

Never think your wasting anyones time with questions
this is how as a small JRSC community we all learn and share our knowledge
and also new ways to do things
Old 11-25-2012, 06:00 PM
  #165  
Honda-Tech Member
 
GOOCH-JDM-ITR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: far EAST SIDE, NY, USA
Posts: 307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

great build thread, its amazing how far your hatch has come!

Is that the LHT header you went with?
Old 11-25-2012, 06:18 PM
  #166  
Trial User
 
civicchick109's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Sweet hatch, keep me posted on new pics!!!
Old 12-16-2012, 07:17 PM
  #167  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Hey everyone. Sorry for the lack of updates. I ate s'h'i't while mountain biking on Thanksgiving morning and broke my collarbone... I then had surgery on Dec. 4 to install a plate and screws. D'oh.

Anyways, I was futzing around tonight in my sling mocking a few more things up. I was trying to see if i had all the plugs and sensors for my LHT intake manifold but, apparently, my Skunk 2 intake and throttle body are at my uncle's house. It was abducted by my dad... Now my car is in three houses at the same time... The sk2 manifold has my throttle body and a bunch of other stuff.

I did, however, have my fuel rail so I thought I'd see how it fits up.

The short answer, it doesn't. The welding on the LHT manifold creates about an 1/8" offset. My plan is to grind down the mounts on the fuel rail. Seeing as they're only there to retain the fuel rail and that there's no load on it, I don't anticipate this being a problem.






I'm so glad I'm doing this with the engine out of the car.

Here's a thread with a similar problem: https://honda-tech.com/forums/forced-induction-16/help-lht-jrsc-fuel-rail-fitment-issues-2784597/. Another: https://honda-tech.com/forums/showpo...ostcount=13221. And, another: https://honda-tech.com/forums/showpo...postcount=9676. And, another: https://honda-tech.com/forums/showpo...postcount=9675. Seems pretty common.

Last edited by CX-Adam; 12-16-2012 at 07:50 PM.
Old 12-16-2012, 07:20 PM
  #168  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Originally Posted by GOOCH-JDM-ITR
great build thread, its amazing how far your hatch has come!

Is that the LHT header you went with?
Thanks! I've been reading your thread a lot. It's helping me identify problems BEFORE they're real problems.

No, the LHT header is WAY too expensive. No doubt it's worth it but, I'm not that serious. It's the PLM V2. I love the look and it's one of the few 4-1s out there.
Old 12-17-2012, 06:11 PM
  #169  
Honda-Tech Member
 
GOOCH-JDM-ITR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: far EAST SIDE, NY, USA
Posts: 307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Originally Posted by CX-Adam
Thanks! I've been reading your thread a lot. It's helping me identify problems BEFORE they're real problems.

No, the LHT header is WAY too expensive. No doubt it's worth it but, I'm not that serious. It's the PLM V2. I love the look and it's one of the few 4-1s out there.
Ah, thanks for answering, and I thought so. I too love the look of that header, I'm still considering it even though I would have to convert to the half-radiator to run it. I was also thinking about the RMF narrow and chopping it up and moving the merge collector close to the primaries, to be more like the Kamikazee, but DAMN the PLM just looks the best. I'm glad my thread has helped you a bit, and I see you talking to Mr Grim who got me through all the rough spots. That guy is an all star.
Old 12-18-2012, 06:31 AM
  #170  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Raven_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Great write up and fantastic work on the hatch. I picked up a hatch a year ago here in Toronto with a little rust on the rear quarters and just did a quick fix to get it to pass DOT, looking at doing the repair panels and get my civic back to original. I am in the process of doing a b18c1 swap and am getting more inspired by your post to get my civic up and looking half as good as yours.
Keep up the great work.
Old 12-19-2012, 07:09 AM
  #171  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Originally Posted by Raven_1
Great write up and fantastic work on the hatch. I picked up a hatch a year ago here in Toronto with a little rust on the rear quarters and just did a quick fix to get it to pass DOT, looking at doing the repair panels and get my civic back to original. I am in the process of doing a b18c1 swap and am getting more inspired by your post to get my civic up and looking half as good as yours.
Keep up the great work.
Thanks. It's been about three years now since I started. It's definitely a process.

Good luck on the swap. Just remember to tag and bag as you remove parts.
Old 12-30-2012, 01:54 PM
  #172  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Whelp, my shoulder is healed enough for me to sorta work on stuff.

Should I bother painting my VTEC solenoid, Distributor (aluminum part), Starter motor housing, and thermostat housing?

Pictures of progress will be up later this evening / tomorrow.

Also, this: Poison the Well - Opposite of December on Myspace

Best hardcore/metalcore album, ever.
Old 12-30-2012, 03:50 PM
  #173  
R.I.P. Mark
iTrader: (1)
 
MRGRIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

just take it easy collarbone can take up to a year to get right
and easy to rebreak with heavy lifting or stress
Old 12-30-2012, 07:26 PM
  #174  
talks to himself
Thread Starter
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

Progress Pic:



I think I did a really good job labeling things when I took the engine apart. So far I've been able to identify the hoses and connections fairly easily. I am, however, having trouble with the connections the JRSC replaced. Like, where the heck the second hose for the FICV (Fast Idle Control Valve) goes? I know one of them goes to the IAC. It's the other one I can't figure out. The other hose used to connect to the intake manifold on both the Skunk 2 IM and on the OEM IM but, there's no second hose nipple on the barb'd fitting that works with the JRSC. The install instructions talk about some fitting near the distributor but I have NO idea what it's talking about. (See quote at the end of this post.)

Current Arrangement:


Old, OEM style arrangement that my JRSC unit is replacing:


Quote from "Jackson Racing Installation Instructions Supercharger System 94-01 Acura Integra GS-R B18C1." The instructions are hosted by Honda-Tech member Veris here: Instructions Strike'd text is text that shouldn't apply to my engine.

116. Take the 12-inch long by 5/16” diameter coolant hose supplied with the kit and connect the hose from the vacant fitting on the intake manifold near the #4 cylinder. Connect the other end to the fast idle valve mounted on the bottom of throttle body. On 98-01 models, disregard this operation. Instead, install an 1/8” NPT plug above the #4 cylinder. On the
98-01 models, reconnect the original hose from the cylinder head, near the distributor, back onto the bottom of the throttle body’s Fast Idle Valve.
Old 12-30-2012, 08:17 PM
  #175  
R.I.P. Mark
iTrader: (1)
 
MRGRIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: My 95 Civic CX hatch build

there should be a hole above the heater hose outlet on top
when looking from above 1/8npt
if you look at the pic of my engine right above the blue hose behind the TB you can see a blue fitting pointing straight up

also you dont have to use the 2foot long heater hose as they did in the instructions
to connect the inlet to thermo housing
you can reuse the U shape hose just has to be cut right down ..but does fit

and you could get rid of the FICV TB and go to a larger TB like 69mm
then no problems with the FICV
IACV will do all the work of idle with out problems


Quick Reply: My 95 Civic CX hatch build



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 AM.