which is more reliable
12-20-2001, 10:57 AM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Re: which is more reliable (1fastcx)
There are topics on this already, have been and always will be........FLAME, use your lazy fingers to do a search are your lazy eyes to read!
Edit: I have been in your shoes, look for more things to ask. I.E. would a N/A built to the power of a Turbo me more reliable.....? And even that can be answered with a search. IF you change something from stock, it must be built with the strongest materials possible......if not, NO there is no reliability.
[Modified by Spade, 11:59 AM 12/20/2001]
Edit: I have been in your shoes, look for more things to ask. I.E. would a N/A built to the power of a Turbo me more reliable.....? And even that can be answered with a search. IF you change something from stock, it must be built with the strongest materials possible......if not, NO there is no reliability.
[Modified by Spade, 11:59 AM 12/20/2001]
12-20-2001, 11:03 AM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Re: which is more reliable (Spade)
Mild amounts of power made by either are reliable. Once you go all out, with either one, it will get tricky.
If your not breaking stuff, your not making enough power.
If your not breaking stuff, your not making enough power.
But, it also depends on how maticulous you are.
Trending Topics
12-20-2001, 02:01 PM
#8
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: wake forest, nc, usa
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: which is more reliable
i dont know why everyone thinks a turbo is unrelaiable! a turbo is only unreliable if you try to run high boost all the time, dont have correct boost management, and dont let it cool down before you turn your car off (assuming its a ball bearing turbo)...but high compression is pretty much the same thing...mix the two, and theres the real challenge
12-23-2001, 07:08 PM
#11
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: which is more reliable (1fastcx)
LOL actually why are u guyz clowning his question, ok its not a good one but all motor isnt nececarly "non-risky" you kno this. Throw some race only cams oversized pistons cam gears and a fully built head and u mist shift on dat 13:1 one compression (figgurtivly speeking) with that chiped ecu see what happens lol. verses a 9:8 compression turbo pushing 20 lbs of boost.... not too much of a diffrence. both are risky both are expensive.
ALL MOTOR GETS MORE RESPECT
ALL MOTOR GETS MORE RESPECT
12-23-2001, 07:20 PM
#12
New User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: which is more reliable (RPM_CRAZY)
The staff of Honda-Tech.com has become aware that you, oh timid newbie, may be wary of posting your musings on our little corner of the Internet. But, young fragile newbie, we want to make you feel welcome and answer your questions. To ease the process we suggest you heed the following advice:
First, research our topics to see if your question has already been answered. The site is equipped with a search function that allows you to browse past discussions. Not only might you find an answer to your question, you will also find a great archive of accumulated knowledge that you may wish to read at any time.
First, research our topics to see if your question has already been answered. The site is equipped with a search function that allows you to browse past discussions. Not only might you find an answer to your question, you will also find a great archive of accumulated knowledge that you may wish to read at any time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post