i-VTEC-i y0! hi im shane and Ricey McRicerton approved this message y0!
12-02-2004, 01:15 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maricopa County
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i-VTEC-i y0! hi im shane and Ricey McRicerton approved this message y0!
http://world.honda.com/HDTV/news/2003-4031127a/
not quite geared toward our kind of performance, yet! but just imagine the possibilities. all i know is where is my i-VTEC-i y0?
not quite geared toward our kind of performance, yet! but just imagine the possibilities. all i know is where is my i-VTEC-i y0?
12-02-2004, 01:54 PM
#3
Electrician
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably coming here in 2006. Crazy looking piston. I'm wondering if performance companies will take the new i-VTEC-i into account and make upgraded pistons using the OEM dome, or maybe upgrading the dome to allow more fuel to enter the pocket and yeild more compression. Seems like great engine, but a little too many things going on at one time for my taste. Something is bound to **** up sooner or later, and might be pretty costly. Plus, that VTC mechanism seems as if you can advance/retard ignition soo far. Don't think it'll work well with turbo/nitrous applications. Could be wrong though.
12-02-2004, 01:57 PM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Dimi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dimi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> a little too many things going on at one time for my taste.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Same thing i was thinking.
Same thing i was thinking.
12-02-2004, 02:01 PM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Catching Rivers on Fire TWICE
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: i-VTEC-i y0! hi im shane and Ricey McRicerton approved this message y0! (OrangeCiviC251)
wow i feel stupid would anyone be so kind as to convert the power outputs to ft/lbs and hp please
12-02-2004, 02:03 PM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Re: i-VTEC-i y0! hi im shane and Ricey McRicerton approved this message y0! (OrangeCiviC251)
man that piston design just screams hot spots and carbon deposits around the giant hole in the middle
crazy none the less.
crazy none the less.
Trending Topics
12-02-2004, 03:30 PM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: watching you fap in the bathroom
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Archidictus)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Archidictus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A 56:1 stoich ratio makes my skull bleed. You're not turbocharging that without some serious issues.</TD></TR></TABLE>
then go all motor!
then go all motor!
12-02-2004, 03:46 PM
#16
Unceasing Measure
Re: (It's Dirk)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by It’s Dirk »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">then go all motor! </TD></TR></TABLE>
High compression has the same drawbacks in this case. Predetonation would rape the **** out of an engine with a fuel injector seated in the combustion chamber. I dunno, I've been wrong like one time before
so maybe this is the next big performance revolution in mechanics.
I know direct injection is already popular, but the lean-burn issue is really freakish to me. Meh...time for some research.
</TD></TR></TABLE>High compression has the same drawbacks in this case. Predetonation would rape the **** out of an engine with a fuel injector seated in the combustion chamber. I dunno, I've been wrong like one time before
so maybe this is the next big performance revolution in mechanics.I know direct injection is already popular, but the lean-burn issue is really freakish to me. Meh...time for some research.
12-02-2004, 03:48 PM
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Re: i-VTEC-i y0! hi im shane and Ricey McRicerton approved this message y0! (sohcvtec1995)
Innovation is good Imagine, 65:1 AF without slagging parts...yummy.
Imagine, 65:1 AF without slagging parts...yummy.
12-02-2004, 03:50 PM
#18
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: i-VTEC-i y0! hi im shane and Ricey McRicerton approved this message y0! (Soccerking3000)
I don't know the torque or gas milage figures, but 156ps is almost the same as 156hp.
12-02-2004, 04:15 PM
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (slammed_93_hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by slammed_93_hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">any one thinking this might be the new "vx, hx" motor?</TD></TR></TABLE>
any one thinking the same thing ^^^
any one thinking the same thing ^^^
12-02-2004, 04:49 PM
#21
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glock money makin
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (slammed_93_hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by slammed_93_hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">any one thinking the same thing ^^^</TD></TR></TABLE>
yup...
yup...
12-02-2004, 04:57 PM
#22
Electrician
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (slammed_93_hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by slammed_93_hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
any one thinking the same thing ^^^</TD></TR></TABLE>
But why in a twin-cam platform? I bet they can make all that into a SOHC and probably yeild more gas mileage.
Then again, they were aiming for both performance AND efficiency.
any one thinking the same thing ^^^</TD></TR></TABLE>
But why in a twin-cam platform? I bet they can make all that into a SOHC and probably yeild more gas mileage.
Then again, they were aiming for both performance AND efficiency.
12-02-2004, 05:11 PM
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: cali
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Dimi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dimi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
But why in a twin-cam platform? I bet they can make all that into a SOHC and probably yeild more gas mileage.
Then again, they were aiming for both performance AND efficiency.</TD></TR></TABLE>
SOHC motor isn't gona cut it in a minivan or SUV
But why in a twin-cam platform? I bet they can make all that into a SOHC and probably yeild more gas mileage.
Then again, they were aiming for both performance AND efficiency.</TD></TR></TABLE>
SOHC motor isn't gona cut it in a minivan or SUV
12-02-2004, 05:12 PM
#25
cute little bastard
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sersey Jhore
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Dimi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dimi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Then again, they were aiming for both performance AND efficiency.</TD></TR></TABLE>
My thoughts as well
Then again, they were aiming for both performance AND efficiency.</TD></TR></TABLE>
My thoughts as well