Hydrualic or Cable
03-27-2004, 10:15 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Amboy, NJ, U.S.
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hydrualic or Cable
my friend has a 94 Del Sol 5spd. and is planning of a b series swap. my question is should he go wit the hydrualic or cable transmission. wats are the pros and cons of each transmission.
03-27-2004, 10:31 AM
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Hydrualic or Cable (DanW)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DanW »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hydraulic, because that's what he has now. </TD></TR></TABLE>
The only real pro for switching to cable is that they are usually cheaper.
The only real pro for switching to cable is that they are usually cheaper.
03-27-2004, 11:16 AM
#4
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hydrualic or Cable (92b16vx)
I like cable alot better...its cheaper and there are less things that arent mechanical that can **** up...its been called a "man's tranny" (take it for what its worth...lol). The cable is harder to get use to and into gear and stuff but I like it.O yea and theres less **** in the engine bay with a cable.My vote: cable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95lscivic
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
08-16-2005 07:03 PM
idriveadelsol7
Forced Induction
6
04-22-2005 05:19 PM