Higher elevation = slower car true? or not?
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BackYard Mechanic, usa
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Higher elevation = slower car true? or not?
I moved to massachusettes and and drive my eg with b20vtec, it seems like my car has loss power?
the vtec seems weak and the car seems much heavier. is this really true about elevation?
can it be the elevation that is making the car feel weaker?
the vtec seems weak and the car seems much heavier. is this really true about elevation?
can it be the elevation that is making the car feel weaker?
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Hudson
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Higher elevation = slower car true? or not? (7mile)
Where'd you move from? Central MA isn't at any type of elevation to cause a noticeable drop in power from most places.
But it is true about elevation. Thinner air, less fuel to burn in same volume of air.
But it is true about elevation. Thinner air, less fuel to burn in same volume of air.
#3
Re: Higher elevation = slower car true? or not? (AutoXer)
Yeah, I don't think central mass is at any elevation to make a difference, but my brother, who lives in Denver and has a WRX, was blown away by the speed of my old corolla FX16 (with 3 people in the car) when he came to visit me in NC.
Sean
Sean
#5
Re: Higher elevation = slower car true? or not? (GetawayInMoscow)
No. Carburetors do have to be adjusted to run properly at higher elevations, but the thin air at extremely high elevations will make even Fuel Injected cars much slower. Just like cars will be faster in death valley. Think of it like reversed forced induction. At higher altitudes, the air doesn't have as much pressure (think psi) and you can't get as much air in the engine. It isn't much of a difference but probably enough to take away a good chunk of horswepower compared to sea level.
Sean
Sean
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Hudson
Posts: 3,622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Higher elevation = slower car true? or not? (SCCAsean)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SCCAsean »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yeah, I don't think central mass is at any elevation to make a difference, but my brother, who lives in Denver and has a WRX, was blown away by the speed of my old corolla FX16 (with 3 people in the car) when he came to visit me in NC.
Sean</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, Colorado is certainly one of the places where elevation would have an effect.
Sean</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, Colorado is certainly one of the places where elevation would have an effect.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Littleton, CO, USA
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Higher elevation = slower car true? or not? (Eyal 951)
Haha I enjoy it when I see a b16a swap with bolt ons run 16 second quarter miles up here... it's lovely.
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 40.201N, 77.189W, PA
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: Higher elevation = slower car true? or not? (SCCAsean)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SCCAsean »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No. Carburetors do have to be adjusted to run properly at higher elevations, but the thin air at extremely high elevations will make even Fuel Injected cars much slower. Just like cars will be faster in death valley. Think of it like reversed forced induction. At higher altitudes, the air doesn't have as much pressure (think psi) and you can't get as much air in the engine. It isn't much of a difference but probably enough to take away a good chunk of horswepower compared to sea level.
Sean</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GetawayInMoscow »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Its true...but if you are FI it wont matter.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think he meant Force induced rather than fuel injected... but hey.
Sean</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GetawayInMoscow »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Its true...but if you are FI it wont matter.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think he meant Force induced rather than fuel injected... but hey.
#10
B*a*n*n*e*d
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Higher elevation = slower car true? or not? (HondaBullSQ)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HondaBullSQ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I think he meant Force induced rather than fuel injected... but hey. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I think he meant Force induced rather than fuel injected... but hey. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AnAccordIsForever
Honda Minivans, Crossovers, and Trucks
4
10-25-2017 06:56 AM
8dxhatchy8
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
12
04-19-2010 01:02 PM
SoullessJapaneseMachine
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
05-21-2007 08:16 AM