Help deciding on a Header (2000 Si)
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mission Viejo, CA, USA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Help deciding on a Header (2000 Si)
I've been looking at header's for a while and i've come down to 3 choices, but im not sure which one is good. Im looking at the Greddy 4-2-1 stainless, DC 4-2-1 stainless, and the Apex GT header. Which would give me a throat-ier exhaust sound and better gains? Im more of a CARB legal person, but i'll let that slide
Thanks.
Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
i would recomend the AN-R compact header if u had the extra cash. definately made my exhaust deeper in tone and i picked up mid-top end power over my JDM DC 4-1
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Jacksonville, Florida, USA
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (JDMlyfestyle)
please correct me if i'm wrong, but you can't run a/c with the AN-R header, can you? and i read a while back dc recalled a lot of their headers b/c they were breaking on the welds, apparently the new ones are supposed to be better.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 626, CA
Posts: 8,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (JDM_Ej)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM_Ej »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No You cannot run A/C with the ANR header. Defiantly wont fit. </TD></TR></TABLE>
They have a model that lets you keep your ac. Please dont post anymore
They have a model that lets you keep your ac. Please dont post anymore
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Homie dont, play that, USA
Posts: 11,340
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: (NEONBOY)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NEONBOY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I suggest DC 4-2-1 ceramic coated...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Me too...i have one for sale also
....kick me a pm if interested. Its very reasonably priced
Me too...i have one for sale also
....kick me a pm if interested. Its very reasonably priced
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mission Viejo, CA, USA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly, I don't like how the Ceramic coated header looks..im more into the stainless finish, SInce the Stainless Steel polished finish is so expensive, im looking into the Stainless Steel brushed finish. Correct me if im wrong, but 4-2-1 will give me more mid range gains whereas the 4-1 will give me high end gains?
#11
All Motor Mentor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 902, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: (jeffk182)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jeffk182 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Honestly, I don't like how the Ceramic coated header looks..im more into the stainless finish, SInce the Stainless Steel polished finish is so expensive, im looking into the Stainless Steel brushed finish. Correct me if im wrong, but 4-2-1 will give me more mid range gains whereas the 4-1 will give me high end gains?</TD></TR></TABLE>
The brushed finnish is very nice. Ceramic is ok too just less expensive for the same performance. The 4-2-1 will be a better header for you especially if your car is only mildly modified and you don't plan on doing a lot more with it. The DC header is probably the least expensive out of the 3 that you looked at and the power gains should all be about the same so I'd go with that. Also the collector should only be 2" if it is CARB legal because other than the USDM ITR DC header which has a 2.25" collector (and is CARB legal because the stock exhaust is also 2.25"), all the other DC headers have a 2" collector to maintain CARB legality. The JDM DC header has a 2.5" collector but isn't CARB legal.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 137 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
They have a model that lets you keep your ac. Please dont post anymore</TD></TR></TABLE>
What about power steering? It seems to me that their header doesn't allow the use of one of these 2 things. I like the ANR header a lot but the DC and other headers being considered allows you to run the stock A/C and PS without problem.
The brushed finnish is very nice. Ceramic is ok too just less expensive for the same performance. The 4-2-1 will be a better header for you especially if your car is only mildly modified and you don't plan on doing a lot more with it. The DC header is probably the least expensive out of the 3 that you looked at and the power gains should all be about the same so I'd go with that. Also the collector should only be 2" if it is CARB legal because other than the USDM ITR DC header which has a 2.25" collector (and is CARB legal because the stock exhaust is also 2.25"), all the other DC headers have a 2" collector to maintain CARB legality. The JDM DC header has a 2.5" collector but isn't CARB legal.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 137 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
They have a model that lets you keep your ac. Please dont post anymore</TD></TR></TABLE>
What about power steering? It seems to me that their header doesn't allow the use of one of these 2 things. I like the ANR header a lot but the DC and other headers being considered allows you to run the stock A/C and PS without problem.
#12
Senior Member
Re: (137)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 137 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
They have a model that lets you keep your ac. Please dont post anymore</TD></TR></TABLE>
I havent seen a AN-R B-series header that retains A/C so i wanna see this. I just looked at there website and ran through there names on HT and i see nothing about a header that retains A/C.
The race Header the one that comes straight out towards the raditor will not clear the condensor
the Compact version will not clear the Compressor
The Drag header goes right out the side where the A/C compressor would be
They have a model that lets you keep your ac. Please dont post anymore</TD></TR></TABLE>
I havent seen a AN-R B-series header that retains A/C so i wanna see this. I just looked at there website and ran through there names on HT and i see nothing about a header that retains A/C.
The race Header the one that comes straight out towards the raditor will not clear the condensor
the Compact version will not clear the Compressor
The Drag header goes right out the side where the A/C compressor would be
#13
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Deeezy, CA, USA
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (JDMlyfestyle)
JDM ITR HEADER....STRICTLY HONDA.
______________________________________
<u>Speed Alliance</U> - Exclusive Distributor Of <u>Vertex T&E</u> and Deftforce LSD ATS
Visit Us At Http://www.speedalliance.com
or Call Us At (858) 637-9240 ask for Don, Warren, or Pete
______________________________________
<u>Speed Alliance</U> - Exclusive Distributor Of <u>Vertex T&E</u> and Deftforce LSD ATS
Visit Us At Http://www.speedalliance.com
or Call Us At (858) 637-9240 ask for Don, Warren, or Pete
#15
Darth ModerVader
Re: (00Red_SiR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 00Red_SiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Also the collector should only be 2" if it is CARB legal because other than the USDM ITR DC header which has a 2.25" collector (and is CARB legal because the stock exhaust is also 2.25"), all the other DC headers have a 2" collector to maintain CARB legality</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually, the USDM ITR manifold has a 2" OD collector, like all USDM Integra manifolds. It's true that the majority of the exhaust piping is 2.25" OD, but there are several smaller bottlenecks, including where the cat (which has significantly smaller piping) bolts to the exhaust.
Actually, the USDM ITR manifold has a 2" OD collector, like all USDM Integra manifolds. It's true that the majority of the exhaust piping is 2.25" OD, but there are several smaller bottlenecks, including where the cat (which has significantly smaller piping) bolts to the exhaust.
#20
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mission Viejo, CA, USA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (00EM1Si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 00EM1Si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Mugen JASMA Header Here </TD></TR></TABLE>
Lucky I hope my DC header will be ok..ordering on Monday
Lucky I hope my DC header will be ok..ordering on Monday
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: King Tubbys studio, CA
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (jeffk182)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jeffk182 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Lucky I hope my DC header will be ok..ordering on Monday </TD></TR></TABLE>
Based on personal experience, I think ordering a DC 4-2-1 header is a waste of money. If you're stuck on getting a carb exempt header, and want something very mild, at least go with the DC 4-1.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SA_SoLcHyLD »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">JDM ITR HEADER....STRICTLY HONDA. </TD></TR></TABLE>
You might change your mind if you tried the ANR header.
Lucky I hope my DC header will be ok..ordering on Monday </TD></TR></TABLE>
Based on personal experience, I think ordering a DC 4-2-1 header is a waste of money. If you're stuck on getting a carb exempt header, and want something very mild, at least go with the DC 4-1.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SA_SoLcHyLD »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">JDM ITR HEADER....STRICTLY HONDA. </TD></TR></TABLE>
You might change your mind if you tried the ANR header.
#22
Senior Member
Re: (rodrez.)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You might change your mind if you tried the ANR header. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought my JDM DC 4-1 was the ****..lol then i got my first AN-R header and it blew the JDM DC out of the water. I picked up alot in the midrange-top end over the DC. i have always sworn by AN-R even when some peeps were spreading rumors about there headers where not good to run open header. I made over 50 passes this season open header and still is flawless.. AN-R kicks ***. I might be puttin together another group buy around tax time. so watch for it.
You might change your mind if you tried the ANR header. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought my JDM DC 4-1 was the ****..lol then i got my first AN-R header and it blew the JDM DC out of the water. I picked up alot in the midrange-top end over the DC. i have always sworn by AN-R even when some peeps were spreading rumors about there headers where not good to run open header. I made over 50 passes this season open header and still is flawless.. AN-R kicks ***. I might be puttin together another group buy around tax time. so watch for it.
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: King Tubbys studio, CA
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (JDMlyfestyle)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMlyfestyle »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I thought my JDM DC 4-1 was the ****..lol then i got my first AN-R header and it blew the JDM DC out of the water. I picked up alot in the midrange-top end over the DC. i have always sworn by AN-R even when some peeps were spreading rumors about there headers where not good to run open header. I made over 50 passes this season open header and still is flawless.. AN-R kicks ***. I might be puttin together another group buy around tax time. so watch for it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, I really love the ANR. I was using a JDM DC 4-1, and later a Dynamic Autosport 4-1 with my current poorman ITR set up, and the ANR completely blew them out of the water. The midrange and top end gains are substantial. I can't say enough about the headers performance
I thought my JDM DC 4-1 was the ****..lol then i got my first AN-R header and it blew the JDM DC out of the water. I picked up alot in the midrange-top end over the DC. i have always sworn by AN-R even when some peeps were spreading rumors about there headers where not good to run open header. I made over 50 passes this season open header and still is flawless.. AN-R kicks ***. I might be puttin together another group buy around tax time. so watch for it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, I really love the ANR. I was using a JDM DC 4-1, and later a Dynamic Autosport 4-1 with my current poorman ITR set up, and the ANR completely blew them out of the water. The midrange and top end gains are substantial. I can't say enough about the headers performance
#25
Re: (SA_SoLcHyLD)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SA_SoLcHyLD »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">JDM ITR HEADER....STRICTLY HONDA.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
JDM ITR HEADER
made for 1.8L block, hangs lower, still gets the smack down from a stock DC JDM version (unless you port the inner welds and reweld on the outside, stainless will then look like **** and with all that and the optional heat sheilds it's 2x more than a DC version) AND there's the little thing about him then having to switch out his cat and exhaust to 2.5 or make an adapter which negates most of the gains
BTW since rage apparently employs the AN-R guy now check with them I believe they have an application for ac and ps use but in stainless it will be 2x more than the DC and require the cat and exhaust upgrade and tuning to get it right
</TD></TR></TABLE>
JDM ITR HEADER
made for 1.8L block, hangs lower, still gets the smack down from a stock DC JDM version (unless you port the inner welds and reweld on the outside, stainless will then look like **** and with all that and the optional heat sheilds it's 2x more than a DC version) AND there's the little thing about him then having to switch out his cat and exhaust to 2.5 or make an adapter which negates most of the gains
BTW since rage apparently employs the AN-R guy now check with them I believe they have an application for ac and ps use but in stainless it will be 2x more than the DC and require the cat and exhaust upgrade and tuning to get it right