10kracer

98 ek.98 JDM ITR Swap. AEM CAI, Cheap *** 4-2-1 Dc Headers.. The guy told me that i was losing power because i had the dc headers. He told me to get a jdm type r header.
Well here is the dyno sheet.. 178hp and 124 ft-lbs

[IMG][/IMG]


Modified by 10kracer at 11:52 PM 7/5/2006

-Championship-

aaaand i know you didnt buy those headers right?....

candy eg

good #s.. you should post in the all motor forum.

10kracer

Nope. It came with the car..

biassj

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM_violator &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">aaaand i know you didnt buy those headers right?....</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yea, the stock header would of done better but who cares since you don't have it. Get a better header, like RMF or SMSP.

xtrafastcivic

you should be making more power.. a header would make a world of a difference..

10kracer

I know.. Thanks for the info.

0mtber

iTrader: (2)

2.5 inch collector header + Cam gears + a chipped obd1 ecu & a dyno tune would probably get you around 8-10 more whp.

An example of what a jdm itr motor can make with bolt-ons:

EG type GTR

hey mtber, were the cams tuned with the gears or theyre just there for the bling?

axtran

I have a JDM ITR header on my GSR - If you do go this route, be warned that you'll need 2.5" JDM gaskets to the exhaust, or just weld it on like I did (lol)

LowSlow93Sol

Not bad numbers.. but like others have said get a better header.

-Gary-

I wouldn't obsess about those numbers.

I sure wouldn't complain....

0mtber

iTrader: (2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EG type GTR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hey mtber, were the cams tuned with the gears or theyre just there for the bling?</TD></TR></TABLE>

The cam timing was changed & made some midrange power

6SPD_EK

iTrader: (2)

lol...I dyno'd today 201.5whp 137.9tq on dynopack (dyno's low #'s like mustang )dyno. will post graph shortly

untuned spark, cam angles & a/f was all over the place

6SPD_EK

iTrader: (2)

SkoundrelUSA

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by _adirondackR_ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol...I dyno'd today 201.5whp 137.9tq on dynopack (dyno's low #'s like mustang )dyno. will post graph shortly

untuned spark, cam angles & a/f was all over the place </TD></TR></TABLE>

dynapacks dyno lower than actual? which is the most accurate?

Archidictus

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkoundrelUSA &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dynapacks dyno lower than actual? which is the most accurate?</TD></TR></TABLE>

They're all equally accurate, they just use different reduction factors. Peak numbers aren't what intelligent people look at anyway - the power delivery/area under the curve is why you should get your car slapped onto a dyno.

You can really only compare dynos from the same type of dynamometer.

6SPD_EK

iTrader: (2)

I will be comparing 2 different dynopacks.... baselines & fully tuned

in the next 1.5 week