Exhaust for d16z6 Del Sol
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sammamish, WA, 98074
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exhaust for d16z6 Del Sol
Can't seem to find anyone asking this question, so here goes. What's the best exhaust for the Del Sol Si? I've heard good things about Greddy Evo. and everyone seems to love a'pexi. I'm open to other options too though, looking for good sound, performance and looks. Much appreciated.
#6
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sammamish, WA, 98074
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Exhaust for d16z6 Del Sol (Sketch_hs)
alright... guess i should've asked earlier too, do any of those happen to be street legal. Whether it is or isn't won't be a deal breaker, but if I'm gonna have the possibility of getting a ticket, I wanna know about it.
Thanks for your opinions.
And by the way, I know Tanabe is 50 state-legal already
Thanks for your opinions.
And by the way, I know Tanabe is 50 state-legal already
#7
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Exhaust for d16z6 Del Sol (Brndn999)
I don't know about WA, but CA just passed a law that if your exhaust emmits sound lower than 95db, it is legal regardless of brand.
I would buy RS*R
(my biased opinion)
I would buy RS*R
(my biased opinion)
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sammamish, WA, 98074
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem with rs*r is that they don't make exhaust systems for the del sol. Also, i don't want something too quite. Not to say i don't want to be able to hear either; a nice low pitch that's noticeable but not too noticeable would be perfect. And as I said before, being street legal isn't the make or break factor, just something to consider.
Thanks for the input, keep it coming!
Thanks for the input, keep it coming!
#9
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Brndn999)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Brndn999 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The problem with rs*r is that they don't make exhaust systems for the del sol. </TD></TR></TABLE>
It might be hard to find, but .... THEY DO!
It might be hard to find, but .... THEY DO!
#10
Re: (EG2 SiR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EG2 SiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
It might be hard to find, but .... THEY DO!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Didnt they discontinue making exhausts for the del sol?
It might be hard to find, but .... THEY DO!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Didnt they discontinue making exhausts for the del sol?
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The Emerald City, USA
Posts: 3,025
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Exhaust for d16z6 Del Sol (EG2 SiR)
Originally Posted by EG2 SiR
I don't know about WA, but CA just passed a law that if your exhaust emmits sound lower than 95db, it is legal regardless of brand.
I would buy RS*R
(my biased opinion)
I would buy RS*R
(my biased opinion)
...and in WA, it's also a 95db limit. Tanabe Racing Medallion is only legal w/ the silencer in place. I have The Tanabe RM on my EH and it's gutted. I've never had the silencer in either which makes it extremely loud when the RPM's get up there.
The latest I've heard is that, the officer must DB test you at the time of being pulled over. The test is performed 1 yard away from the furthest tip of your exhaust and at a 90 degree angle. The rev to 3000 in neutral. 95db is the highest you can go.
Here's what I found back in February of 2003:
RCW 46.37.390
Mufflers, prevention of noise -- Smoke and air contaminants -- Standards -- Definitions.
(1) Every motor vehicle shall at all times be equipped with a muffler in good working order and in constant operation to prevent excessive or unusual noise, and no person shall use a muffler cut-out, bypass, or similar device upon a motor vehicle on a highway.
(2)(a) No motor vehicle first sold and registered as a new motor vehicle on or after January 1, 1971, shall discharge into the atmosphere at elevations of less than three thousand feet any air contaminant for a period of more than ten seconds which is:
(i) As dark as or darker than the shade designated as No. 1 on the Ringelmann chart, as published by the United States bureau of mines; or
(ii) Of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or greater than does smoke described in subsection (a)(i) above.
(b) No motor vehicle first sold and registered prior to January 1, 1971, shall discharge into the atmosphere at elevations of less than three thousand feet any air contaminant for a period of more than ten seconds which is:
(i) As dark as or darker than the shade designated as No. 2 on the Ringelmann chart, as published by the United States bureau of mines; or
(ii) Of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or greater than does smoke described in subsection (b)(i) above.
(c) For the purposes of this subsection the following definitions shall apply:
(i) "Opacity" means the degree to which an emission reduces the transmission of light and obscures the view of an object in the background;
(ii) "Ringelmann chart" means the Ringelmann smoke chart with instructions for use as published by the United States bureau of mines in May 1967 and as thereafter amended, information circular 7718.
(3) No person shall modify the exhaust system of a motor vehicle in a manner which will amplify or increase the noise emitted by the engine of such vehicle above that emitted by the muffler originally installed on the vehicle, and it shall be unlawful for any person to operate a motor vehicle not equipped as required by this subsection, or which has been amplified as prohibited by this subsection so that the vehicle's exhaust noise exceeds ninety-five decibels as measured by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) test procedure J1169 (May, 1998). It is not a violation of this subsection unless proven by proper authorities that the exhaust system modification results in noise amplification in excess of ninety-five decibels under the prescribed SAE test standard. A court may dismiss an infraction notice for a violation of this subsection if there is reasonable grounds to believe that the vehicle was not operated in violation of this subsection.
This subsection (3) does not apply to vehicles twenty-five or more years old or to passenger vehicles being operated off the highways in an organized racing or competitive event conducted by a recognized sanctioning body.
#13
TSPeed Factory
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Renton, WA, Vietnam
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Exhaust for d16z6 Del Sol (D16Z6racing)
i don't think cops in WA care about how loud your exhaust is. i find it surprising that a cop in this state will pull you over for that.
as for what kind of exhaust for del sol i'd go with skunk2 or custom mandrel bent piping. user kteller8 on these boards sell mandrel bent piping designed for del sols.
as for what kind of exhaust for del sol i'd go with skunk2 or custom mandrel bent piping. user kteller8 on these boards sell mandrel bent piping designed for del sols.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (Brndn999)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Brndn999 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The problem with rs*r is that they don't make exhaust systems for the del sol. Also, i don't want something too quite. Not to say i don't want to be able to hear either; a nice low pitch that's noticeable but not too noticeable would be perfect. And as I said before, being street legal isn't the make or break factor, just something to consider.
Thanks for the input, keep it coming!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats why i said get the skunk2 cause it is just a rebaged R*SR
Thanks for the input, keep it coming!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats why i said get the skunk2 cause it is just a rebaged R*SR
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: socali
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The Emerald City, USA
Posts: 3,025
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Exhaust for d16z6 Del Sol (AzntaggeR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AzntaggeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i don't think cops in WA care about how loud your exhaust is. i find it surprising that a cop in this state will pull you over for that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Within 1 year, I was given 4 exhaust tickets. That was three years ago.
Since then, I've gotten 3 exhaust tickets.
And within the past year I haven't even been warned about it, only being pulled over twice this past year. They are definitely cutting back on exhaust tickets around here.
All 7 were dismissed in court.
Within 1 year, I was given 4 exhaust tickets. That was three years ago.
Since then, I've gotten 3 exhaust tickets.
And within the past year I haven't even been warned about it, only being pulled over twice this past year. They are definitely cutting back on exhaust tickets around here.
All 7 were dismissed in court.
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know how fond you are of the looks of the greddy evo, but that exhaust sounds awesome. Nice, low, and deep. No high pitched noise whatsoever. That is the exhaust I have on my sol, and it is a great sounding system, with great quality as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
7rrivera7
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
14
06-09-2011 04:46 PM
RedDelSol si
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
7
03-13-2004 10:17 AM
topher
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
7
03-10-2002 04:19 AM