EK4 vs. EK9?
#3
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: hehehe, STOP.., that tickles, usa
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EK4 vs. EK9? (gambit33)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gambit33 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ek4 is the 96-00 sir
ek9 is the 96-00 ctr</TD></TR></TABLE>
aawww.... beat me to it
ek9 is the 96-00 ctr</TD></TR></TABLE>
aawww.... beat me to it
#4
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: If you make me mad, Ill Fling Poo at you
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EK4 vs. EK9? (gambit33)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gambit33 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ek4 is the 96-00 sir
ek9 is the 96-00 ctr</TD></TR></TABLE>
there you go.
ek9 is the 96-00 ctr</TD></TR></TABLE>
there you go.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SCV
Posts: 7,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EK4 vs. EK9? (gambit33)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gambit33 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ek4 is the 96-00 sir
ek9 is the 96-00 ctr</TD></TR></TABLE>
EK4 96-00 w/B16a4
EK9 96-00 w/B16b
ek9 is the 96-00 ctr</TD></TR></TABLE>
EK4 96-00 w/B16a4
EK9 96-00 w/B16b
Trending Topics
#9
Re: EK4 vs. EK9? (gambit33)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gambit33 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i believe that ctr started in 98</TD></TR></TABLE>
naw. it was 96.
>>>>>>who gives a **** anyways? we didn't get it!!!!!!!
naw. it was 96.
>>>>>>who gives a **** anyways? we didn't get it!!!!!!!
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Las Vegas, u.s
Posts: 18,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EK4 vs. EK9? (B16b2b)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16b2b »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
naw. it was 96.
>>>>>>who gives a **** anyways? we didn't get it!!!!!!! </TD></TR></TABLE>
exactly
naw. it was 96.
>>>>>>who gives a **** anyways? we didn't get it!!!!!!! </TD></TR></TABLE>
exactly
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SCV
Posts: 7,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EK4 vs. EK9? (Chris y0!)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris y0! »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">no</TD></TR></TABLE>
all type r started in 96
all type r started in 96
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 805, socal, USA
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: EK4 vs. EK9? (ReaL JDM Eg6)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ReaL JDM Eg6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
all type r started in 96 </TD></TR></TABLE>
right, but any and all EK-9 civic type Rs sold in 1996, were as 1997 models. there is no such thing as a 96 civic type r.
all type r started in 96 </TD></TR></TABLE>
right, but any and all EK-9 civic type Rs sold in 1996, were as 1997 models. there is no such thing as a 96 civic type r.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CivHatchH22
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
7
06-05-2003 11:41 AM