neof69

For those who care to read, just wanted to let you know how a couple of B16's did today on the dynojet.

1. My car 92 Civic Si, 95 B16A3, ITR airbox, Apexi VAFC, JDM ITR header, ITR intake manifold, Spoon Ventulli plate, Spoon Cam gears, CTR N1 crank pulley, Toda Flywheel, T1R resonator, Tanabe RM full exhaust, Timing at 16 degrees, Intake cam at +1, Exhaust cam at -1, tons of pulls best one being 148.5 hp, 108.5 tq. not too shabby for a 1600cc engine with 96,000 miles on her.

2. Friends car 92 Civic CX, 95 B16A3, JDM ITR pistons, Spoon Flywheel, Toda Spec C's, Toda valvesprings, Toda cam gears, Toda timing belt, ITR intake manifold, EG airbox/K&N, JDM ITR header, Test pipe, Buddy Club spec II exhaust, Power FC, CTR crank pulley......182.5 whp, 112 tq.


Modified by neof69 at 10:02 PM 12/12/2003

Timmay

something is not right with the first car, the second is putting down good though

neof69

Whats not right with the first car? Its bone stock internally, stock computer, stock cams, stock pistons, 10:1 compression?

nsxmatt

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neof69 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Whats not right with the first car? Its bone stock internally, stock computer, stock cams, stock pistons, 10:1 compression? </TD></TR></TABLE>

That's about right. I did 151 with less done to mine but mine was a JDM B16

96 SOHC VTEC

The first cars dyno does not sound good for the mods. I have seen much better dyno's with far less mods. Something isn't adding up.

chad

nice numbers ian!!

A DYNO IS JUST A TOOL....a tuning tool.....dyno's VARY GREATLY IN THEIR READINGS!!!! and from dyno to dyno!!

Dancing is Forbidden

nice to see you guys got those beast0rs dynoed.

neof69

For all the guys that say theres did more, i mean of course every single dyno is different, i mean you cant really compare one to the other....My first pull of the day was 136.8hp and 99.6 tq, and just by tuning the VAFC with the Wideband o2 i gained 11whp and 8lb. tq....So like chad says its just a tuning tool.

Db1 Supreme

how does the buddy club spec II sound on your friends car, is it daily driven

Dancing is Forbidden

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EH-3 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how does the buddy club spec II sound on your friends car, is it daily driven</TD></TR></TABLE>it sounds awesome. Yes his car is daily driven. He drives with the silencer in usually though. However a guy here has one and daily drives without the silencer. :EARS:

hybrider

there is NOTHING wrong with the 1st dyno. actually its pretty good, essentially just i/h/e with some good dyno tuning.

lmblf8

wow, awesome numbers on both cars! do you happen to have any pictures of either one? thanks

slammed_93_hatch

nice ****, but damn the TQ numbers

ProEater

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96 SOHC VTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The first cars dyno does not sound good for the mods. I have seen much better dyno's with far less mods. Something isn't adding up. </TD></TR></TABLE>

i had almost idential numbers on my b16a2 with only i/h/e

JDM-97CX

nice numbers..they sound about right, that is what i would expect from that motor with those mods.

japspecjohn

numbers sound normal to me for the mods...plus look at the mileage... not bad

Charlie Moua

iTrader: (3)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by japspecjohn &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">numbers sound normal to me for the mods...plus look at the mileage... not bad </TD></TR></TABLE>


yeah i agree. decent na stock#
haha b16 are funny little motors. boost it already... lol

Timmay

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neof69 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Whats not right with the first car? Its bone stock internally, stock computer, stock cams, stock pistons, 10:1 compression? </TD></TR></TABLE>

yea well i guess its a usdm b16a, thought it said jdm, my jdm b16a with just I/h/e no cat and flywheel put 159.1 with 115.5 tq. thats up here in idaho to nice and high elevation

Richard.

Good numbers on the second one.. First one has some decent #s.

rodrez.

Regarding the first motor dyno'd, and everyone comparing their numbers, peak numbers don't tell the entire story. Also, as stated earlier, every motor is different, and dyno's vary from place to place.
Regarding the peak numbers, I'm almost positive they would be higher if the Ventuli plate was removed.

neof69

Rodrez, i too believe that if the Ventulli plate was not there power might have been better....I got it for free from a friend so i figured i would give it a try, but when i rebuild my engine next year i dont think i will reuse it.

Mike D

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neof69 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Rodrez, i too believe that if the Ventulli plate was not there power might have been better....I got it for free from a friend so i figured i would give it a try, but when i rebuild my engine next year i dont think i will reuse it.</TD></TR></TABLE>

have you dynoed without the ventulli plate? Ive always wanted to see a comparison on the same motor with and without one.

But like you said, theres probably some top end to gain from removing the ventulli plate.

Mike