DYNO Results and track times
09-03-2007, 05:57 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CO, United States
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DYNO Results and track times
d16y8
I am running
-megan header
-full 2.25" catback
-aem sri
-apexi neo
Dyno'd and tuned at around 5,280ft in denver colorado by racing trenz
Ran a 17.699 @80.
17.699@80.27mph in morrison colorado @ 5,400 ft elevation, temp. 79
on a slipping oem honda clutch with 115,000 on it and the car
I am running
-megan header
-full 2.25" catback
-aem sri
-apexi neo
Dyno'd and tuned at around 5,280ft in denver colorado by racing trenz
Ran a 17.699 @80.
17.699@80.27mph in morrison colorado @ 5,400 ft elevation, temp. 79on a slipping oem honda clutch with 115,000 on it and the car
09-03-2007, 06:02 PM
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: DYNO Results and track times (2wheelhunter)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96ej8MR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Dyno'd and tuned at around 5,280ft in denver colorado by racing trenz 17.699@80.27mph in morrison colorado @ 5,400 ft elevation, temp. 79
on a slipping oem honda clutch with 115,000 on it and the car</TD></TR></TABLE>
2 things I'm concerned about:
A) Isn't that how many feet are in a mile???? SIKE!!
B) That's a REALLY shitty time for 133whp.
on a slipping oem honda clutch with 115,000 on it and the car</TD></TR></TABLE>
2 things I'm concerned about:
A) Isn't that how many feet are in a mile???? SIKE!!
B) That's a REALLY shitty time for 133whp.
09-03-2007, 06:04 PM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate, NY, USA
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: DYNO Results and track times (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
B) That's a REALLY shitty time for 133whp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
musta been traction problems
B) That's a REALLY shitty time for 133whp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
musta been traction problems
09-03-2007, 06:04 PM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: DYNO Results and track times (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
2 things I'm concerned about:
A) Isn't that how many feet are in a mile???? SIKE!!
B) That's a REALLY shitty time for 133whp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
One more thing, I have seen ONE (1) PERSON on H-T get a shitty time and be like "yeah, I gotta work on my launches" - or "yeah, I'm shifting too slow" or something of that sort.
EVERY OTHER GUY:
"Ran XX.XXX On bald tires"
"Ran Xx.XXX on slipping clutch"
"Ran XX.XXX on blown motor"
SHUT UP, YOU SUCK AT DRIVING, ACCEPT IT.
EDIT:
PS: Wrong forum.
2 things I'm concerned about:
A) Isn't that how many feet are in a mile???? SIKE!!
B) That's a REALLY shitty time for 133whp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
One more thing, I have seen ONE (1) PERSON on H-T get a shitty time and be like "yeah, I gotta work on my launches" - or "yeah, I'm shifting too slow" or something of that sort.
EVERY OTHER GUY:
"Ran XX.XXX On bald tires"
"Ran Xx.XXX on slipping clutch"
"Ran XX.XXX on blown motor"
SHUT UP, YOU SUCK AT DRIVING, ACCEPT IT.
EDIT:
PS: Wrong forum.
Trending Topics
09-03-2007, 06:07 PM
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CO, United States
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol you should have heeard my car once i got to like 3 gear it started grabbing but all the way through 1st and 2nd shifts it would just slip and rev to like 5
09-03-2007, 06:09 PM
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate, NY, USA
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-03-2007, 06:13 PM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: (ek forever guy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ahhh that made me lol IRL.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Ahhh that made me lol IRL
.
09-03-2007, 06:14 PM
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ek forever guy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
LMAO... 17.699 ride a bike
</TD></TR></TABLE>LMAO... 17.699 ride a bike
09-03-2007, 06:25 PM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate, NY, USA
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (96ej8MR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96ej8MR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">anyone suggest any good aftermarket racing clutches?</TD></TR></TABLE>
well seeing how the power output is nothing too high.. your options for clutches are wide open... possibly just another oem clutch from honda.. exedy is nice and cheap too
well seeing how the power output is nothing too high.. your options for clutches are wide open... possibly just another oem clutch from honda.. exedy is nice and cheap too
09-03-2007, 06:27 PM
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: (2wheelhunter)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96ej8MR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">anyone suggest any good aftermarket racing clutches?</TD></TR></TABLE>
ACT FTW.
I hear XTD is good but I don't know jack about 'em.
I'm not an exedy fan though - but they make good **** too. Depends on how much power you're trying to harness.
ACT FTW.
I hear XTD is good but I don't know jack about 'em.
I'm not an exedy fan though - but they make good **** too. Depends on how much power you're trying to harness.
09-03-2007, 06:35 PM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CO, United States
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
see you guys are nice and dont just bash i mean i know with a good clutch i would have ran faster.. if anyone has anyone had a clutch start going out on them lol well i tryed to race on one lol.. u know the sound of your engine reving after u have let off the clutch all the way and u have to let of the gas for it to catch
09-03-2007, 06:37 PM
#22
I ran a 17.7 in my bone *** stock 96 DX hatch when I first got it. Bristol, TN. I suck at driving. My 60 was about the same as yours.
Last time I ran it, same 60 but on Azenis stock Y7 still with SMSP header/exhaust, EX trans 4.71, Action 1MD and Fidanza, ran 16.0.
Modified by Aquafina at 11:02 PM 9/3/2007
Last time I ran it, same 60 but on Azenis stock Y7 still with SMSP header/exhaust, EX trans 4.71, Action 1MD and Fidanza, ran 16.0.
Modified by Aquafina at 11:02 PM 9/3/2007
09-03-2007, 06:45 PM
#24
MiG-21 superfan
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: near the ocean, Moderator City, NJ
Posts: 8,628
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: (96ej8MR)
any of the reputable clutch companies can provide you a nice upgrade from stock.
some companies to look at- competition clutch, exedy, act, clutchmasters...
i have experience with all of those companies' clutches, esp in the lower 'stages' and the latest one i went with was exedy, but in all honestly at that level the performance is very close between said reputable companies.
some companies to look at- competition clutch, exedy, act, clutchmasters...
i have experience with all of those companies' clutches, esp in the lower 'stages' and the latest one i went with was exedy, but in all honestly at that level the performance is very close between said reputable companies.
09-03-2007, 06:47 PM
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Westslope, CO, United States
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (96ej8MR)
REACTION TIME HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ET.
Saw like 3 people say that was a factor, spend more time at the track.
Thats not bad. My stock 93 civic, no mods but suspension ran a 17.8
Saw like 3 people say that was a factor, spend more time at the track.
Thats not bad. My stock 93 civic, no mods but suspension ran a 17.8